BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Senator Richard Alarc?n, Chairman
Bill No: SB 2040Hearing:April
3, 2000
Author: ChesbroFiscal:Yes
Version: February 25,
2000Consultant:Mark Stivers
INSPECTION OF MARINAS
Background and Existing Law :
The California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations) contains building
construction standards and regulations as adopted by the
California Building Standards Commission. With respect to
most private and local government owned property, this code
is enforced by local building officials. Various state
entities, however, have responsibility for specific types
of state and school facilities. State buildings and
schools are inspected by the State Architect within the
Department of General Services. Hospitals are inspected by
the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
Other departments and agencies generally have the
responsibility to enforce applicable codes at facilities
under their jurisdiction.
The Office of the State Fire Marshall recommends, and the
California Building Standards Commission adopts, the
Uniform Fire Code that relates to fire safety. The State
Fire Marshall or local fire officials enforce these
portions of the Building Standards Code. Fire inspectors
generally focus their inspections on the adequacy of
ingress and egress, and fire hydrant and sprinkler systems.
With respect to electrical wiring, inspections are limited
to the use of extension cords.
Currently, there are roughly 800 marinas in California. As
with most other facilities, marinas are only inspected when
construction, alteration, or renovation work is done that
requires a building permit. Local inspectors have no
jurisdiction over state or federal property, including
marinas on state or federal land.
SB 2040 -- Version 02/25/00
Page 2
Proposed Law :
Senate Bill 2040 would require every city or county fire
department or district providing fire protection services
to inspect annually every marina within its jurisdiction
for compliance with applicable building standards and other
regulations of the State Fire Marshall.
Comments :
1. Tragedy at Lake Sonoma . This bill arose from an
unfortunate occurrence at a marina on Lake Sonoma in which
a young girl, Deirdre McCormick, died from electrocution
while swimming next to the dock. Investigators have not
positively determines what caused current to escape the
floating dock's electrical system, but they did find
several defects that could have been to blame. The author
believes that inspecting marinas for building code
violations will prevent future tragedies. The committee
may wish to consider whether or not this one incident
merits a statewide inspection program.
2. The right entity? Building inspectors generally enforce
compliance with building standards such as those that apply
to plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems. Fire
inspectors generally focus their inspections on occupancy
limits, the adequacy of entrances and exits, hydrant and
sprinkler systems. The code violations most likely to
occur at marinas are arguably those for which building
inspectors would have more expertise. The committee may
wish to consider an amendment to have building inspectors
conduct the annual inspections rather than fire officials.
3. Lack of jurisdiction. The marina at Lake Sonoma is on
property owned by the federal Army Corps of Engineers.
Some other marinas in the state are situated on state or
federally owned lands where, absent a contractual
agreement, local inspectors have no jurisdiction. As SB
2040 is drafted, inspections would only take place at
private or local government owned marinas. While the state
will not be able to require inspections on federal
property, such as Lake Sonoma, the committee may wish to
consider an amendment to require the Department of General
SB 2040 -- Version 02/25/00
Page 3
Services or the Department of Boating and Waterways to
inspect, or contract with local entities to have inspected,
marinas on state land.
Support and Opposition : (3/28/)
Support : Sonoma County District Attorney
Opposition : unknown