BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1491
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing: June 26, 2000

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION 
                                Tom Torlakson, Chair
                     SB 1491 (Leslie) - As Amended:  May 24, 2000

           SENATE VOTE  : 39-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   Railroad crossings: automated warning devices

           SUMMARY  : Authorizes the California Public Utility Commission  
          (CPUC) to supervise the operation of pilot projects to evaluate  
          proposed railroad crossing warning devices at designated  
          crossings, with the consent of specified parties.  CPUC would  
          evaluate each pilot project on a case-by-case basis.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Declares the intent of the Legislature that the CPUC authorize  
            pilot projects, after an application is filed and approved, in  
            at least the communities of Roseville and Lathrop to test the  
            utility and safety of stationary, automated audible warning  
            devices as an alternative to trains having to sound their  
            horns as they approach railroad crossings. 

          2)Exempts train operators from the requirement to sound horns  
            within 1,320 feet from an at-grade crossing, if the railroad  
            crossing has a permanently installed audible warning device  
            that automatically sounds when an approaching the crossing. 

          3)Authorizes, on an application by application basis, CPUC to  
            supervise the operation of pilot projects for the purpose of  
            evaluating proposed railroad crossing warning devices or new  
            technology at designated crossings, with the consent of the  
            local jurisdiction, the affected railroad, and other  
            interested parties. 

          4)Declares that it is an urgency measure to take effect  
            immediately.

           EXISTING LAW  requires the sounding of a locomotive bell or  
          whistle at least 1,320 feet from the place where the railroad  
          crosses any street, with certain exceptions. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  : Unknown









                                                                  SB 1491
                                                                  Page  2

           COMMENTS  : The author indicates that he was prompted to introduce  
          this measure after the City of Roseville failed in its attempt  
          gain permission from the CPUC to create a pilot project to  
          install an automated horn system at two railroad crossings.  The  
          intent of the pilot project is to provide an alternative to the  
          current practice of trains sounding their whistles as they  
          approach the crossings. 

          The pilot project would employ an automated horn system, known  
          as a "wayside horn. "   These stationary horns have the  
          potential to reduce noise pollution because the horns are  
          located at railroad crossings, and can be directed down a  
          street.  Train whistles, however, sounds for about a quarter  
          mile as a train approaches a crossing dispersing its sound in  
          every direction. 

          The CPUC found the project that was proposed by the City of  
          Roseville ran contrary to state law.  Some cities, including  
          Sacramento, have established "quiet zones" in which train  
          whistles are either banned or restricted.  The Federal Railroad  
          Administration (FRA) is formulating draft regulations to limit  
          "quiet zones" to areas only where supplementary safety measures  
          are installed, such as four quadrant gates. 

          The FRA has evaluated the wayside horns proposed in this bill by  
          commissioning a study of such a system that is deployed in  
          Nebraska.  That study noted that using a wayside horn in lieu of  
          the train whistle reduced net community noise impacts, but the  
          report questions how effective that particular system was in  
          alerting motorists. The study itself, however, notes "the  
          wayside horn shows promise as a warning device that can reduce  
          community noise impact without adversely affecting safety." 

          This bill proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of wayside  
          horns by conducting pilot projects and in turn providing the  
          analysis of those projects to the FRA in the hope that the  
          wayside horn can provide for adequate safety and less nuisance  
          than sounding the train whistle in the more traditional fashion.  


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support  

          California Railroad Industry








                                                                  SB 1491
                                                                  Page  3

          City of Roseville
          Orange County Transportation Authority
            Roseville Chamber of Commerce

           Opposition  

          United Transportation Union

           Analysis Prepared by  : Andrew Antwih / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093