BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                    SB 1006
                                                            

           SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                    Byron D. Sher, Chairman
                   1999-2000 Regular Session
                                
BILL NO:    SB 1006
AUTHOR:     Costa
AMENDED:    April 12, 1999
FISCAL:     No                HEARING DATE:     May 10, 1999
URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Arnie Peters
  
SUBJECT  :    WATER SOFTENERS: LOCAL-LEVEL REGULATION

  SUMMARY  :    

  Existing law  :

1) Contains a legislative declaration that the right of  
   residential water consumers to the use of domestic water  
   supplies should be interfered with only for reasons of  
   health and safety, that the availability of residential  
   water softeners is necessary to ensure the right to a  
   functional residential water supply, but that residential  
   water softeners may be used only as provided in law.

2) Allows self-regenerating residential water softeners  
   (appliances that use salt solutions to regenerate their  
   capability to soften water and then discharge the waste  
   brine to the sewer) to be installed and used in homes only  
   if:

   a)    The water softener is certified to meet a salt  
      efficiency rating of 2850 grains of hardness per pound  
      of regenerating salt.  (This rating means that 6.5  
      ounces of hardness are removed from water for every 16  
      ounces of salt used.)

   b)    The certification is provided by the user of the  
      water softener and the certification form is filled in  
      by the contractor and filed with the local agency that  
      issues plumbing permits.

   c)    The following water conservation devices are  
      installed at the time the water softener is installed:  









                                                    SB 1006
                                                      Page 2

      faucet flow and shower head restricters, toilet  
      reservoir dams, and bypass valves that divert unsoftened  
      water to the outside water supply faucets.

  This bill  :

1) Amends the legislative declaration described above to say  
   that the right of residential water consumers to use  
   domestic water supplies may be interfered with in order to  
   protect water quality, as well as for health and safety  
   purposes, and that, to ensure the right to a functional  
   residential water supply, the availability of water  
   softeners may be required, rather than being absolutely  
   necessary.

2) Provides that the statutory authorization to install  
   residential water softeners when the conditions described  
   above (see item 2 under "existing law") are met does not  
   include the right to install self-regenerating residential  
   water softeners or to discharge brine waste into a  
   community waste system if the local administering agency  
   adopts an ordinance or rule to control salty discharges to  
   the sewer for any of the following reasons:

   a)    To comply with waste discharge requirements issued by  
      the regional water quality board or to otherwise protect  
      the beneficial uses of water.

   b)    To comply with water reclamation requirements or a  
      master reclamation permit issued by the regional water  
      board.

   c)    To recycle water containing waste.

  COMMENTS  :

  1) Purpose of Bill  .  This bill is sponsored by the Irvine  
   Ranch Water District and the Association of California  
   Water Agencies.  Its purpose is to address a long-standing  
   conflict between local wastewater and water supply agencies  
   on the one hand and the water softener industry on the  
   other.  The conflict can, perhaps, best be described by two  
   related questions:









                                                    SB 1006
                                                      Page 3


   a)   Should residential water users be permitted, without  
     restriction, to install and use self-regenerating water  
     softeners that discharge brine wastewater to the  
     community sewer system when two basic conditions are met   
     -- the water softeners meet a specified salt use  
     efficiency standard and water conservation devices are  
     also installed to limit the amount of softened water  
     used?

   b)   Should local wastewater and water supply agencies be  
     permitted to regulate or even prohibit the use of  
     self-regenerating residential water softeners if that is  
     necessary in order to meet water quality regulatory  
     requirements or in order to recycle water?

  Existing state law answers these questions in favor of  
  residential water users and the water softener industry that  
  sells and installs self-regenerating water softeners.  This  
  bill would change state law to answer the questions in favor  
  of local wastewater and water supply agencies.

  2) History of the Issue  .  The conflict described above has  
   apparently been an issue for many years.  Existing law,  
   which resolved the issue in favor of residential water  
   consumers and the water softener industry was enacted 21  
   years ago by SB 2148 (Campbell).  Senator Campbell has  
   stated that the intent behind the bill was threefold:

   a)   To ensure that water consumers would be able to enjoy  
     the benefits of softened water at a reasonable cost.

   b)   To require that water softeners meet a statewide  
     numerical efficiency standard - namely the removal of 6.5  
     ounces of the dissolved solids that cause hard water for  
     each pound of salt used to regenerate the water  
     softeners.

   c)   To prohibit local jurisdictions from outlawing the  
     sale and use of self-regenerating water softeners by  
     enacting a state statute that preempts local ordinances.

  Since the enactment of SB 1248 in 1978, local agencies  









                                                    SB 1006
                                                      Page 4

  around the state have enacted ordinances or rules regulating  
  or banning the use of self-regenerating water softeners.   
  These ordinances have been challenged in court and have been  
  found to be invalid by at least two state district courts of  
  appeal in  Water Quality Assn. v. County of Santa Barbara   
  (1996) and  Water Quality Assn. v. City of Escondido  (1997).   
  In both cases, the courts held that local ordinances  
  regulating or banning self-regenerating water softeners are  
  void because state law regulating water softeners has  
  preempted local control by occupying the field.  The appeal  
  courts went on to state that if local agencies wish to  
  regulate or ban self-regenerating water softeners, "they  
  must seek amendment or repeal of the [now existing] state  
  statutory scheme."

  3) Self-Regenerating Water Softeners.   Water softeners remove  
   the metal ions that cause hardness in water by the use of a  
   special device called an ion exchange resin.  The resin  
   attracts these metal ions and binds them within its matrix  
   until there are no longer sites at which the ions can bind.  
    At that point the resin must be regenerated and this is  
   accomplished by bathing the resin in a salty solution that,  
   because of its high concentration of positive ions from the  
   salt, removes the metal ions.  The latter, along with the  
   excess salt, are then discharged into the sewer.

   Water softeners can be  divided into two general  
   categories.  The first category consists of devices that  
   use exchangeable tanks containing the ion exchange resin.   
   When the resin requires regeneration, the tank containing  
   it is exchanged for another and the first tank is sent to  
   an offsite commercial facility for regeneration.  This bill  
   does not affect the use of exchangeable tank water  
   softeners.

   The second category consists of self-regenerating water  
   softeners.  The regeneration of these appliances is  
   initiated manually, by a timing device or by a system that  
   senses when the ion exchange resin is close to exhaustion  
   and regeneration is required.  Self-regenerating water  
   softeners discharge the waste brine from the regeneration  
   process directly to the sewer.  This bill would allow local  
   sewer and water agencies to regulate or ban this category  









                                                    SB 1006
                                                      Page 5

   of water softeners. 

  SOURCE :        Irvine Ranch Water District and the Association  
               of California Water Agencies.  

SUPPORT  :       Aliso Water Management Agency, Bakersfield  
               Public Works Department, Borrego Water  
               District, California Association of Sanitation  
               Agencies, Calleguas Municipal Water District,  
               Carmel Area Wastewater District, Carpinteria  
               Valley Water District, Central Basin Municipal  
               Water District, Central Contra Costa Sanitary  
               District, Cities of Encinitas, Escondido,  
               Merced, Santa Maria, Santa Paula, Santa Rosa,  
               Thousand Oaks, Turlock, Visalia, County  
               Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County,  
               Fairbanks Ranch Community Services District,  
               Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency,  
               Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Lake Arrowhead  
               Community Services District, League of  
               California Cities, Lee Lake Water District,  
               Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control  
               Agency, Municipal Water District of Orange  
               County, Natural Resources Defense Council,  
               Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Padre Dam  
               Municipal Water District, Pajaro Valley Water  
               Management Agency, Rancho Santa Fe Community  
               Services District, Russell Valley Municipal  
               Water District, San Dieguito Water District,  
               San Gabriel County Water District, Scotts  
               Valley Water District, South Bayside System  
               Authority, South Coast Water District, South  
               East Regional Reclamation Authority, South  
               Orange County Reclamation Authority, Sunnyslope  
               County Water District, Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation  
               Agency, Vallecitos Water District, Valley  
               Center Municipal Water District, Vandenberg  
               Village Community Services District, Victor  
               Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority,  
               WateReuse Association, West Basin Municipal  
               Water District, Whispering Palms, 3 letters  
               from private citizens  










                                                    SB 1006
                                                      Page 6

OPPOSITION  :    Advanced Water Systems (3 letters), American  
               Water Products, Inc., AQUA 2000, Aquion Limited  
               Partners, B & D Quality Water, Inc. (28  
               letters), CALPURE, California Water  
               Conditioning Company, Casalegno's Water  
               Filtration, Central Coast Water Treatment, Inc.  
               (3 letters), Challenger Water International,  
               Inc., Continental Water Softener, Culligan (36  
               letters), ECO Water Systems (23 letters),  
               Femino's Trattoria, Fremont-Rideout Health  
               Group, Fresh Water Systems (11 letters), GE  
               Appliances, Highland Well Service (2 letters),  
               Ionics (2 letters), Kinetico/AAA Water Systems  
               (3 letters), Kiss International, Life Time  
               Solutions (29 letters), Inc., Liquid Solutions  
               (9 letters), Morley Water Improvement Systems,  
               New Age Water Technology, North State Water  
               Testing, Park International Corp. (32 letters),  
               Precision Installation Products, Inc., Pure  
               Water Centers, Purified Water Systems (3  
               letters), Quality Home Products (3 letters),  
               Quality Water Engineering, Inc., Rain Soft,  
               Randazzo's Water Conditioning, Rayne Quality  
               Water (5 letters), Rayne Water Conditioning (46  
               letters), Richetti Water Conditioning Systems  
               (4 letters), Smart Systems, Special T Water  
               Systems, Inc. (14 letters), Superior Water  
               Systems, Water Factory Systems, Water, Inc.,  
               Water Specialties, Water Quality Association,  
               Water Quality Systems (6 letters), USFilter,  
               West Coast Services (2 letters), Western Salt  
               Company (3 letters), Western Water Products (8  
               letters), Yuba City Florist, water conditioning  
               company employees & private citizens (27  
               letters)