BILL ANALYSIS
SB 855
Page 1
Date of Hearing: June 8, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE
Michael Machado, Chair
SB 855 (Haynes) - As Amended: May 11, 1999
SENATE VOTE : 37-0
SUBJECT : Recycled water
SUMMARY : Establishes a timeframe for a public recycled water
retailer to establish rates for service. Specifically, this
bill :
1)Authorizes a customer to request in writing a retail water
supplier enter into an agreement or adopt recycled water rates
to deliver recycled water.
2)Requires a retailer of water service mail a written offer to
the customer within 90 days of receipt of the request.
3)Requires the rates and conditions for the recycled water
established between the supplier and the customer by contract,
ordinance or resolution within 120 days from the customer
request.
EXISTING LAW :
The Water Recycled Act (WRA) was amended by SB 2103 (Haynes)
Chapter 753, Statutes of 1998 established a procedure to
maximize the use of recycled water, when available, in lieu of
higher quality, potable water.
The WRA requires the water retailer set rates for recycled water
service if no rate exists. The WRA does not require the retail
water supplier to set the rate within a specific time period.
However, if the retail water supplier does not set the rate in a
timely manner, then either the customer or the retail water
supplier may seek formal mediation. If formal mediation fails,
remedy is in the courts without a presumption in favor of the
retail water supplier.
The WRA makes findings regarding the importance of recycled
water and establishes a statewide goal to recycle 700,000 acre
feet of water per year by the year 2000 and 1,000,000 acre feet
SB 855
Page 2
per year by the year 2010. Currently, there is about 450,000
acre feet per year of water being recycled.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS : Proponents believe SB 855 will ensure that rates for
recycled water will be set within a reasonable timeframe and
that agencies responsible for the necessary retrofits can
proceed with critical state loan applications.
Opponents of this measure believe the 120 day period for the
retail water service to respond to a customer request should not
be changed to 90 days because the supplier may need to design
and construct a distribution facility to provide service to a
new customer.
Suggested Amendment
Change the requirement period for response to a customer to 120
days. This timeframe was vigorously negotiated last year
between the Association of Water Agencies and BKK Corporation,
the sponsor of SB 2103.
The process of determining the nature of distribution facilities
needed to provide service, calculating the costs of those
facilities, determining the scope of potential environmental
impacts, and obtaining governing board approval for an agreement
or rate must all be accomplished before a written offer can be
submitted.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
Central Basin Municipal Water District (sponsor)
West Basin Municipal Water District (sponsor)
Opposition
Association of California Water Agencies
Analysis Prepared by : JoEllen McChesney / W., P. & W. / (916)
319-2096