BILL ANALYSIS SB 855 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 8, 1999 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE Michael Machado, Chair SB 855 (Haynes) - As Amended: May 11, 1999 SENATE VOTE : 37-0 SUBJECT : Recycled water SUMMARY : Establishes a timeframe for a public recycled water retailer to establish rates for service. Specifically, this bill : 1)Authorizes a customer to request in writing a retail water supplier enter into an agreement or adopt recycled water rates to deliver recycled water. 2)Requires a retailer of water service mail a written offer to the customer within 90 days of receipt of the request. 3)Requires the rates and conditions for the recycled water established between the supplier and the customer by contract, ordinance or resolution within 120 days from the customer request. EXISTING LAW : The Water Recycled Act (WRA) was amended by SB 2103 (Haynes) Chapter 753, Statutes of 1998 established a procedure to maximize the use of recycled water, when available, in lieu of higher quality, potable water. The WRA requires the water retailer set rates for recycled water service if no rate exists. The WRA does not require the retail water supplier to set the rate within a specific time period. However, if the retail water supplier does not set the rate in a timely manner, then either the customer or the retail water supplier may seek formal mediation. If formal mediation fails, remedy is in the courts without a presumption in favor of the retail water supplier. The WRA makes findings regarding the importance of recycled water and establishes a statewide goal to recycle 700,000 acre feet of water per year by the year 2000 and 1,000,000 acre feet SB 855 Page 2 per year by the year 2010. Currently, there is about 450,000 acre feet per year of water being recycled. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : Proponents believe SB 855 will ensure that rates for recycled water will be set within a reasonable timeframe and that agencies responsible for the necessary retrofits can proceed with critical state loan applications. Opponents of this measure believe the 120 day period for the retail water service to respond to a customer request should not be changed to 90 days because the supplier may need to design and construct a distribution facility to provide service to a new customer. Suggested Amendment Change the requirement period for response to a customer to 120 days. This timeframe was vigorously negotiated last year between the Association of Water Agencies and BKK Corporation, the sponsor of SB 2103. The process of determining the nature of distribution facilities needed to provide service, calculating the costs of those facilities, determining the scope of potential environmental impacts, and obtaining governing board approval for an agreement or rate must all be accomplished before a written offer can be submitted. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Central Basin Municipal Water District (sponsor) West Basin Municipal Water District (sponsor) Opposition Association of California Water Agencies Analysis Prepared by : JoEllen McChesney / W., P. & W. / (916) 319-2096