BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                          SB 96
                                                          Page  1

Date of Hearing:   June 21, 1999

             ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE 
                        Roderick Wright, Chair
              SB 96 (Peace) - As Amended:  June 14, 1999

  SENATE VOTE  :   35-0
  
SUBJECT  :   Electrical restructuring:  Independent System Operator:   
Power Exchange.

  SUMMARY  :  This bill revises specific provisions relating to the  
governing structures of the Independent System Operator (ISO) and the  
Power Exchange (PX) and the duties of the Electricity Oversight Board  
(EOB).  Specifically,  this bill  : 

1)Repeals existing law establishing the Legislature's intent and  
  replaces it with more specific provisions.

2)Establishes that California shall have the exclusive right to  
  decline appointments to the ISO and PX only for the electric service  
  matters within the state's exclusive jurisdiction. 

3)Establishes that the existing ISO and PX board composition shall  
  remain in effect until another state joins the ISO or PX.

4)Establishes that procedures for all other governing board members  
  shall be the subject of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  
  (FERC) exclusive approval.  

5)Requires the ISO and PX to modify their bylaws to apply only to  
  matters that are not subject to Federal jurisdiction and  
  specifically adds language which states that California's bylaws  
  approval function shall not preclude FERC from taking any action  
  necessary to address undue discrimination or other violations of the  
  Federal Power Act.

6)Removes the California residency requirement and instead requires  
  that board members represent classes of consumers served by the ISO  
  and PX.

7)Limits EOB's appeals functions to matters within the state's  
  jurisdiction.

8)Requires the ISO and PX to modify their bylaws to state that any  








                                                          SB 96
                                                          Page  2

  future agreement regarding board appointments among participating  
  states which would have the effect of expanding the ISO and PX into  
  a multistate entity be filed with FERC.
  
EXISTING LAW  establishes the Legislature's intent that California  
enter into a compact with western region states and requires utilities  
in those states selling energy into the California market to adhere to  
enforceable standards and protocols to protect the reliability of  
regional transmission and distribution systems.  

Provides for the creation of an ISO and PX with certain prescribed  
powers and duties.

  FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown
  
COMMENTS  :   

1)AB 1890, (Brulte) [Chapter 854, Statutes of 1996], contained intent  
  language that established the process for California's entry into an  
  interstate compact with other western states to require utilities  
  selling energy into the California markets to adhere to standards  
  and protocols to protect the reliability of regional transmission  
  and distribution systems.  This bill repeals those provisions and  
  provides a detailed description of the responsibilities of the EOB,  
  the ISO and PX.  This bill outlines activities which are the  
  exclusive jurisdiction of State government agencies and FERC, as  
  well as those that are the responsibility of both FERC and state  
  government agencies.  

2)The restructuring of California's electric industry occurred on two  
  parallel paths.  Approval was required by the state, which came in  
  the form of comprehensive electric restructuring legislation, AB  
  1890.  Because the ISO and PX are non-public entities engaged in the  
  interstate transmission and wholesale power markets, their  
  operations are subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Federal Power  
  Act.  Thus, in November, 1996, FERC issued an order granting  
  conditional approval of the basic restructuring plan.  When FERC  
  approved the ISO and PX tariffs, it rejected those portions of their  
  bylaws requiring California residency and EOB appointment of  
  governing board members.  

3) In November 1998, FERC issued an Order Finding Noncompliance and  
  directed the ISO and PX to revise their bylaws within 45 days to  
  remove references to EOB in the process of appointing Governing  
  Board members, the California residency requirement, and  








                                                          SB 96
                                                          Page  3

  requirements that the EOB approve changes to the ISO and PX Bylaws.   
  Additional directives of the November 1998 decision required that  
  the Bylaws be changed to remove the EOB in hearing appeals of the  
  ISO Governing Board except on a voluntary basis.  In that compliance  
  with FERC decision would greatly undermine the state's authority, at  
  the direction of the Governor and with approval of the Attorney  
  General, EOB appealed the decision as a challenge to our state's  
  authority.  The appeal is still pending.  However, in an effort to  
  continue effective oversight of the restructured electricity market  
  by FERC and EOB, parties to the appeal have indicated that it would  
  be beneficial to settle these matters if a reasonable balance of  
  State and federal interests could be maintained.  This bill is  
  intended to codify the basis of a resolution under consideration by  
  representatives of FERC and the State Legislature.  

4)This bill addresses the critical issues raised by FERC in the  
  November 1998 decision.  This bill makes modifications that comply  
  with the November 1998 decision in the areas of appointment  
  functions, changes to the Bylaws, the residency requirement,  
  appeals, and future member state appointments.  Based on discussions  
  with FERC staff a slight modification may be needed to clarify that  
  California does not have exclusive jurisdiction over the appointment  
  of all board members representing consumer groups.  Otherwise, the  
  proposed changes provide the necessary protections to California's  
  authority without encroaching into FERC's jurisdiction.

  REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

  Support  

None on file
  
Opposition  

None on file 

  Analysis Prepared by  :    Carolyn Veal-Hunter / U. & C. / (916)  
319-2083