BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






          Senate Committee on Industrial  
          Relations      1999-2000 Regular Session Hilda L. Solis,  
          Chair                         
                                                  Fiscal:   Yes
                                                  Urgency:  No
                                             
                                        
                                Bill No: AB 2509
                                Author: Steinberg
                       Version: As Amended June 26, 2000
          

          Subject:

          Wage and Hour Violations: enforcement procedures; penalties

          Support:
          
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO (Sponsor)
          Employment Law Center, Legal Aid Society of San Francisco
          Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
          California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit  
          Union
          California Conference of Machinists
          Engineers and Scientists of California
          Hotel Employees, Restaurant Employees International Union
          Region 8 States Council of the United Food & Commercial  
          Workers
          Service Employees International Union
          Transport Workers Union of America
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees 
          
          Opposition:
          
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          California Retailers Association
          Orange County Business Council
          Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California
          Printing Industry Association of California
          California Business Properties Association
          California Farm Bureau Federation
          Western Growers Association
          California Landscape Contractors Association
          Woodworking Institute of California









          California Association for Health Facilities at Home
          California Hotel and Motel Association
          Lumber Association of California and Nevada
          California Association of Builders and Contractors
          Associated General Contractors
          Civil Justice Association of California
          
          Purpose:
          
          To streamline and alter many enforcement and administrative  
          procedures of wage and hour laws before the Labor  
          Commissioner and the courts, increase civil penalties and  
          damages for violations.

          Analysis:
          
           Existing law  structures a framework for the enforcement of  
          laws relating to the payment of wages and overtime  
          compensation, and working conditions by the Labor  
          Commissioner, chief of the Division of Labor Standards  
          Enforcement of the Department of Industrial Relations.

          Under the following categories,  existing law  and this bill  
          provide that:

          1.   Administrative Proceedings: Consolidation  
          Separate administrative hearings by the Labor Commissioner  
          are required to establish 1) if minimum wages are owed and  
          2) what civil penalties should be assessed: $50 for an  
          initial violation and $250 for subsequent violations.

          This bill permits the Labor Commissioner to combine both  
          proceedings into one hearing.

          2.   Subpoenas; Mail Notice
           The Labor Commissioner in an administrative wage claim  
          proceeding may obtain records relating to the claim by  
          issuance of a subpoena served by personal service.

          This bill permits the Labor Commissioner to obtain records  
          through a notice by mail rather than by a subpoena, and to  
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          2                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









          require all documents requested by subpoena or notice to be  
          received not less than 5 days prior to a hearing.

          3.   Interest
           The legal rate of interest on unpaid wages due pursuant to  
          an award by the Labor Commissioner is based on a statute  
          which was repealed in 1993.  Under breach of contract  
          provisions in the Civil Code, courts may award interest on  
          wages due at 10%.

          This bill references the Civil Code section for 10%  
          interest for Labor Commissioner awards.

          4.   Appeals: Bonds; Court Costs  
          An employer may seek a de novo review of the Labor  
          Commissioner's order, decision, or award following an  
          administrative hearing.

          This bill requires an employer that seeks such a review to  
          post a surety bond or deposit in the amount of the award  
          with the court of jurisdiction.  Also, a requirement of  
          judicial arbitration does not apply in such circumstances.

          This bill also permits the court to award attorney's fees  
          and costs to the Labor Commissioner in the same manner as  
          private counsel.

          5.   Right of Private Action: Unpaid Wages
           Most prevailing parties in a civil suit to recover unpaid  
          wages or overtime compensation are entitled to be awarded  
          reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

          This bill would clarify two overlapping sections of the  
          law, specifying that an employee, separate from other wage  
          cases, is eligible to be awarded interest, in addition to  
          wages due and attorney's fees and costs.

          6.   Liquidated Damages: Unpaid Minimum Wages 
           A court may award liquidated damages in an amount equal to  
          the unpaid wages and interest due thereon for violation of  
          minimum wage laws.  The award may only be a result of a  
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          3                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









          civil suit filed by the complainant or by the Labor  
          Commissioner.

          This bill permits the Labor Commissioner to award  
          liquidated damages in the same manner as a court, instead  
          of requiring the state agency to file a suit to recover  
          such damages.

          7.   Wage Bonds  
          The Labor Commissioner may order an employer to post a bond  
          to ensure future payment of wages in cases where the  
          employer has failed to satisfy a final judgment for  
          nonpayment of wages.

          This bill permits the Labor Commissioner to require that  
          the bond also include interest penalties and other demands.

          8.   Shareholder Liability  
          Substantial shareholders of a corporation may be found  
          jointly and severally liable for the corporation's failure  
          to secure workers' compensation insurance in action brought  
          by the Director of Industrial Relations. 

          This bill would make the parent and substantial corporate  
          shareholders jointly and severally liable with the  
          corporation for unpaid wages and penalties.  Liability  
          would apply to shareholders owning at least 15 percent of  
          the total value of stock or beneficial interests in the  
          corporation.

          9.   Successor Liability
           A garment manufacturer employer that is a successor to an  
          employer who owes wages to former employees is liable for  
          those wages if the successor meets any of the following  
          criteria:
               -uses substantially the same physical facilities to  
          produce the same product for the same customer base;
               -employs the same managers who control the wages and  
          working conditions; and
               -is an immediate family member of any owner, partner,  
          or officer of the previous employer.
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          4                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









           
          This bill would extend successor liability to all wage  
          claims, regardless of the industry of the employer.

          10.   Insufficient Funds: Waiting Time Penalties
           Building and construction industry employers are subject to  
          30 day waiting time penalties where wages or fringe  
          benefits are paid with a check for which payment is refused  
          due to insufficient funds.

          This bill would extend the penalties to all employers,  
          regardless of industry, and be in addition to other  
          applicable penalties under law.

          11.   Itemized Wage Statements: Piecework
           Employers are required to issue an itemized wage statement  
          when wages are due including net and gross wages earned,  
          hours worked (excluding salaried employees and exempt from  
          daily overtime pay), dates of work, and all deductions.

          This bill requires the number of piecework units earned and  
          the applicable piece rate(s) to be listed.

          12.   Itemized Wage Statements and Records: Penalties; Right  
          of Private Action
           Violators of the wage statement requirement are subject to  
          a civil penalty of $250 for the initial violation and $1,00  
          for subsequent violations.  Proven inadvertence is taken  
          into consideration.

          For a knowing and intentional violation, actual damages or  
          $100, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney's fees  
          and costs.

          This bill provides that the penalty for an employer that  
          fails to maintain records on each employee, a penalty equal  
          to a year's wages for the number of all workers employed  
          the previous year may be awarded, unless the employer can  
          prove a lesser amount is justified.

          For a knowing and intentional violation, this bill permits  
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          5                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









          an employee to recover a penalty of up to $100 per payroll  
          period up to a maximum of $10,000.  The employee may bring  
          a claim before the Labor Commissioner or file a civil  
          action for damages or penalties, and attorney's fees.
           
           13.   Payroll Records: Content
           Employers must maintain payroll records containing  
          specified information: an employee's name, address, hours,  
          and various rates of pay during each payroll period. Also,  
          IWC Orders require employers with piece rates to fully  
          explain them to employees and keep production records.

          This bill requires the amount of piecework units earned and  
          the piece rate(s) to be part of the mandated records to be  
          held by the employer, and applicable current IWC Orders  
          recordkeeping requirements. 
          14.   Payroll Records: Penalties  
          Willful failure to maintain payroll records subjects an  
          employer to a civil penalty of $500.

          This bill would decrease the penalty from $500 to $100 per  
          employee for each payroll period up to a maximum period of  
          three years.
           
           15.   Rest and Meal Periods: Right of Private Action
           Applicable Orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission  
          (IWC) require that employers must provide a 10 minute rest  
          period every 4 hours and a 30 minute meal period every 5  
          hours.  On-duty meal periods are permitted when the nature  
          of the work performed so dictates.

          This bill prohibits employers from requiring any employee  
          to work during any meal or rest period mandated by an  
          applicable IWC Order.  Violators would be subject to a $50
          civil penalty and an amount twice the hourly rate of pay,  
          or piece work pay, of the full meal or rest period.  In  
          addition to filing with the Labor Commissioner, the  
          employee would have the option of filing a civil court  
          action, and the award of attorney's fees and costs.

          16.   Discrimination Complaints; Right of Private Action
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                         AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          6                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









           Employers may not discharge or discriminate against an  
          employee for seeking compliance with labor laws.  An  
          employee may file a complaint against the employer with the  
          Labor Commissioner.  If the Commissioner dismisses such a  
          complaint, the employee may seek an appeal of the dismissal  
          with the U.S. Department of Labor if it involves  
          occupational safety and health issues.

          This bill would require that if the U.S. Department of  
          Labor determines that the Labor Commissioner erred in  
          dismissing an employee complaint, the Commissioner shall,  
          within 15 days, either notify the parties of the ongoing  
          federal investigation of the complaint, or issue a new  
          state determination in the matter.

          It would also permit an employee to file a civil action for  
          unlawful retaliation without first filing a discrimination  
          complaint with the Commissioner.

          17.   Posting of Violation Notices
               Employers are required to post in the workplace  
          specified information, including applicable Wage Orders of  
          the Industrial Welfare Commission.

          This bill would require employers found engaging in a  
          pattern and practice of violating wage and hour laws to  
          post a notice issued by the Labor Commissioner for not less  
          than 60 days, describing the nature of the violation and  
          related information.  Failure to post a notice subjects an  
          employer to a $500 civil penalty for each instance of  
          refusal.




          18.   Gratuities: Dancers
           Gratuities or tips which have been paid to or left for an  
          employee by a patron, above the actual amount due, are the  
          property of the employee.  An employer may not receive  
          gratuities intended for the employee, or deduct or credit  
          such gratuities against wages due.
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          7                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 










          This bill would specify that amounts left by patrons for  
          dancers employed in public housekeeping establishments  
          (e.g. casinos, restaurants, night clubs) or in the  
          amusement or recreation industry are deemed gratuities.   
          This clarifies situations where dancers may be incorrectly  
          identified as independent contractors and not employees  
          entitled to keep gratuities.

          19.   Gratuities: Payments & Processing Fees
           Employers are not specifically prohibited from deducting  
          processing fees associated with gratuities paid by credit  
          cards.

          This bill would prohibit an employer from deducting from a  
          gratuity left on a credit card slip any processing fee or  
          cost.  Gratuities made by credit card must be paid the  
          employee not later than the next regular payday following  
          the date the patron authorized the credit card payment.

           20.  Necessary Tools or Equipment: Purchase; Penalties
           Applicable Orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission  
          (IWC) require that employers must provide and maintain  
          necessary tools or equipment for the job.  Employees  
          earning at least twice the minimum wage may be required by  
          the employer to provide and maintain such elements  
          themselves.

          This bill would require that if the employer fails to  
          provide or maintain the tools and equipment necessary, and  
          the employee purchases such elements, the employer must:
          -purchase the elements equal to the price paid by the  
          employee; or
          -pay the employee at least twice the minimum wage, in order  
          for the employee to be exempted from providing and  
          maintaining necessary tools and equipment.

          Comments:
          
          1.    Proponents  argue that California has a large and  
               growing Underground Economy of employers who are  
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          8                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









               chronic violators of wage and hour, safety, and tax  
               laws. Such employers pay cash under the table or with  
               checks that bounce, fail to report and pay employment  
               taxes, work their employees long hours without rest  
               breaks, and avoid paying wage judgments issued against  
               them.  They cheat workers out of billions of dollars  
               in wages due hard working employees.

               Illegal activity by flagrant violators of basic labor  
               laws is unfair to law-abiding employers who find it  
               difficult to compete in such an environment.

               Proponents cite Executive Orders concerning the  
               expanding Underground Economy issued by Governors  
               Deukmejian and Wilson, noting a $60 billion lawless  
               enterprise and the state's 1993 loss of $3 billion in  
               taxes alone.

               Supporters generally state that the administrative  
               procedures streamlined in this measure have been well  
               discussed by labor, management, and state enforcement  
               officials over the years and are long overdue.

          2.    Opponents  state that they have serious concerns  
               regarding nearly all of the  changes proposed by this  
               bill and their collective impact on employers who even
               inadvertently violate a wage and hour law.  These  
               include: authorizing the Labor Commissioner to create  
               new, different rules of evidence and subpoenas  
               process; eliminating judicial discretion to require  
               non-binding arbitration on appeals; reopening of  
               previously dismissed claims when letters criticizing a  
               state program are filed with the federal government;  
               establishment of joint, and several liability for  
               substantial shareholders and successive employers; and  
               new, mandated payment of restitution plus civil  
               penalties for failure to pay minimum wages consisting  
               of all underpaid wages, any interest owed and  
               statutory liquidate damages.

               The California Chamber of Commerce additionally argues  
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          9                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









               that this measure contains provisions that were vetoed  
               last year by Governor Davis as too broad and  
               excessive.

          3.    Administration Position  .  The Department of Industrial  
               Relations has not taken a position on this measure.

          4.    Double Referral  .  This measure has also been referred  
               to the Senate Committee on Judiciary for  
               consideration.

          5.    Vote History  .  This measure passed the Assembly Labor  
               and Employment Committee by a 6 to 3 vote and the  
               Assembly Floor by a 41 to 32 vote.

          6.    Prior Legislation  .  This measure is similar to AB 1652  
               (Steinberg) of 1999 which was vetoed by the Governor.   
               It does not contain several elements that were  
               encompassed within the vetoed bill, including a  
               private right of action to recover and share in a  
               portion of the state's civil penalties for wage  
               violations.

               The Governor's veto message of AB 1652 said, in part:

            "?.This legislation, while laudable in its intent,  
            duplicates many existing enforcement efforts and contains  
            excessive penalties.





            Existing law already provides penalties against employers  
            who issue bad checks
            for payment of wages.  Additionally, requiring employers  
            who engage in a
            pattern of violating wage and hour laws to post a  
            declaration that there will
            be no further violations is unworkable and meaningless.   
            This legislation, as
          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          10                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations 









            drafted, is overly broad.

            I would be happy to consider additional legislation to  
            protect workers against
            unscrupulous employers if present enforcement efforts  
            prove to be
            insufficient."































          Hearing Date:  June 28, 2000                          AB  
          2509  
          Consultant: Patrick Henning                            Page  
          11                             
          Senate Committee on Industrial Relations