BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1470
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 12, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE
Dennis Cardoza, Chair
AB 1470 (Cardoza) - As Amended: February 26, 1999
SUBJECT : Market milk: pooling of Class 3 milk and processing
plant election.
SUMMARY : Requires dairy processing plants to elect annually to
receive market milk, and that all milk used to produce Class 1,
Class 2, and Class 3 milk products, shall be market milk and
pooled, except for dairies producing manufacturing milk that
were in business prior to December 31, 1998 may be used to
produce selected Class 2 and Class 3 products. Specifically,
this bill :
1)Requires a dairy processing plant receiving market milk (Grade
A) to elect each January 1, beginning in January 1, 2000, to
receive market milk for the next 12 month period.
2)Requires all milk used to produce Class 1, Class 2, and Class
3, as defined, dairy products to be market milk and pooled in
the state milk pooling program.
3)Exempts from # 2, milk from dairies producing manufacturing
milk (Grade B) and permits it to be used to produce selected
Class 2 and Class 3 products, if the dairies were in business
prior to December 31, 1998 and had not produced market milk
prior to that date.
EXISTING LAW authorizes the milk pooling program with payment by
processors for milk based upon the end usage of milk, using a
formula for fat and solids-non-fat content which is tied to
national cheese and butter prices, and neighboring states' fluid
milk prices. Current law authorizes these monies to be pooled,
equalized and distributed to producers. Milk products are
defined in 5 classes:
Class 1: fluid milk, lactose reduced milk, and UHT (ultra
high temperature) milk sold in-state.
Class 2: fluid creams, sour creams, buttermilk, cottage
cheese, yogurt and UHT milk sold out-of-state.
Class 3: ice cream, ice milk, light dairy dessert, sherbet,
frozen yogurt, and frozen mixes.
Class 4a: butter, powder.
Class 4b: hard cheeses.
AB 1470
Page 2
The Milk Pooling Act requires Class 1, Class 2 and certain Class
3 milk products to be included in the milk pooling program.
Processors elect to be pool plants or non-pool plants.
Producers must elect each January, to produce Grade A or Grade B
milk for a 12 month period. Grade A milk can be used for all
Classes of products. Grade B milk can only be used for certain
frozen Class 3 products, and 4a - 4b products.
FISCAL EFFECT : No general fund impact.
COMMENTS : In 1968, the California Legislature passed the
Gonsalves Milk Pooling Act which began pooling milk proceeds for
producers so that a blended or "equalized" price would be paid
to all participating producers. The wholesale or producer price
for milk is based on the end use of the milk. These various
product prices are then blended in the pool and payment is made
to the producer. The pool system was intended, in addition to
equalizing the price received by all milk producers, to
stabilize the market for producers, and provide a consistent and
affordable milk supply to consumers.
Originally, bottled milk or Class 1 was included in the pool; in
1972 some Class 2 products were included, and in 1996 producers
were required to elect to be in the pool or not. Not all fluid
milk is included in the pool program. The most notable
exception are the Producer/Handlers (PD's) which are vertically
integrated operators. They own dairies as well as processing
plants and distribution systems. The market for Class 1 milk
has been relatively flat for many years (22% of total
utilization) while Classes 4a and 4b have grown substantially
(38% and 29% of total utilization respectfully). PD's receive
the fluid milk price outside of the pool based on a formula and
their own production. PD's may purchase milk beyond their
production, and participate in the pooling system.
The sponsors of this legislation believe that the integrity of
the pool system is at risk whenever there is possible seepage
from their 'pooling dam'. By taking any milk out of the pool
system the pool suffers and therefore, all producers in the pool
suffer. In order to maintain the integrity of the pool, SB 1885
(Costa) was passed (Chapter 759, Statutes of 1996) to prevent
producers from jumping in and out of the pool. Such jumping did
occur by producers during anomalies in the butter and cheese
market during opportunities for a producer to receive a higher
price by going around the pooling system. AB 1470 is addressing
AB 1470
Page 3
a potentially similar situation with respect to Class 3 products
and pricing circumstances that would benefit an individual
producer to the detriment of other producers.
Opponents of this legislation believe this proposal could
restrict new technologies such as ultra filtration (UF) or
reverse osmosis (RO) which removes water from the raw milk
product in a cold process on the farm site. Further, it could
hamper processors that are innovative and creates a disincentive
for them to operate processing plants within California. Under
federal marketing orders, which are currently under review and
change, Class 3 milk is not required in their pooling plans.
Federal orders cover the rest of the United States' production.
AB 1470 will eliminate a potential economic benefit to one or
more producers, and keep that economic benefit in the pool for
all producers to share. According to information provided by
the Department of Food and Agriculture using basic price
information only (not using fat/solids-non-fat information), the
impact to announced pool prices if all Class 3 milk were removed
from the pool system on a rolling average over the last 24 month
period, would be an increase to the pool prices by $.004 per
cwt. Sponsor's information using a similar analysis but with
fat/solids-non-fat values and not rolling averages, reflect that
the pool prices drop. Using this analysis on 6.5 million pounds
of Class 3 milk would have removed an estimated $1.66 million
and $1.25 million from the pool in 1997 and 1998, respectfully.
There are other issues being raised in the California
Legislature regarding milk pooling, pricing and standards: the
removal of organic milk from the pool; expanding the PD's
exemption; changing the standards of California milk (SB 1284,
Bowen, failed passage in Senate policy committee, and; surveying
and posting of retail milk prices (SB 419, Speier, heard in
Senate policy committee 5-11-99).
The committee members need to decide if it continues to be the
Legislature's policy to keep milk in the pooling process or
allow milk to be moved in and out of the pool.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
AB 1470
Page 4
Western Alliance of Milk Producers (co-sponsors)
Western United Dairymen (co-sponsors)
Agricultural Council of California
Danish Creamery Association
California Milk Producers
Thomas and Carol Bess
Opposition
Dreyers
Dairy Institute
Analysis Prepared by : Jim Collin / AGRI. / (916)319-2084