BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1149
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 19, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
Roderick Wright, Chair
AB 1149 (Aroner) - As Amended: April 8, 1999
SUBJECT : Underground electric and telephone facilities.
SUMMARY : Requires the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) to conduct hearings and submit a report to the
Legislature, by January 1, 2001, on existing regulations
relating to underground electric and telephone facilities.
Specifically, this bill :
Requires the CPUC to investigate and assess the following
aspects of its undergrounding program:
a) The continuity of the existing underground system and
ways to eliminate uneven patches of overhead facilities;
b) Ways to enhance public safety;
c) Ways to improve reliability; and
d) Ways to provide more flexibility to local governments.
EXISTING LAW authorizes CPUC to supervise and regulate every
public utility in the state and to do all things necessary and
convenient in the exercise of its power and jurisdiction;
Specifies that CPUC has regulatory authority over public
utilities.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown.
COMMENTS :
1)The author has introduced this bill to address a district
issue.
2)According to City of Oakland officials, recent undergrounding
projects within the city have resulted in scattered streets
within a proposed utility undergrounding area and fail to meet
any of the three CPUC criteria for such projects. When
undergrounding projects fail to meet the CPUC criteria, the
AB 1149
Page 2
public utility cannot utilize existing funds set aside for
construction costs. As a result, the costs to install the
underground facilities must be paid by the property owners,
"which becomes extremely cost-prohibitive."
3)According to the author, the purpose of this bill is reexamine
existing CPUC undergrounding rules and procedures,
specifically Tariff Rule 20, which was established just over
three decades ago.
4)The CPUC ordered the institution of overhead to underground
conversion programs for electric utilities in 1967 (D. 73078),
for aesthetic and safety purposes. According to CPUC staff,
this bill is a worthy approach to address the need to revise
and update Tariff Rule 20.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
City of Oakland (sponsor).
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by : Joseph Lyons / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083