BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1082
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 1082 (Calderon)
As Amended June 20, 2000
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: | |( June 1, 1999 |SENATE: |37-0 |( June 29, |
| | |) | | |2000 ) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(vote not relevant)
Original Committee Reference: U. & C.
SUMMARY : Permits telephone corporations that are regulated
under a "price cap" regulatory structure to issue stock or debt
unless the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
determines that such an issuance is not in the public interest.
The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of this bill,
and instead:
1)Authorize CPUC to exempt a telephone corporation that is
regulated under a price-cap regulatory structure from
specified stock and security transaction provisions, unless
the corporation:
a) Secures the financing by pledging a plant or assets;
and,
b) CPUC determines that such an issuance is not in the
public interest.
2)Provide that these provisions shall continue to apply to any
telephone corporation that is also an electric or gas
corporations, as defined.
3)State legislative intent that these provisions shall not
hinder CPUC's existing authority to disallow imprudent
expenses or capital expenditures of the utilities under its
jurisdiction, or CPUC's authority to impute a capital
structure or cost of capital for utilities under its
jurisdiction.
EXISTING LAW authorizes CPUC to:
AB 1082
Page 2
1)Regulate decisions governing stock and security transactions
of any public utility, if CPUC finds it is required by the
public interest.
2)Exempt any public utility or class of public utility from its
regulations relating to stock and security transactions if it
finds that their application does not impact the public
interest.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill established that CPUC would
be required to allow employee related transition costs made
pursuant to Section 375 of the Public Utilities if CPUC finds
those costs to be reasonable.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS : In 1951, CPUC was granted the legal oversight of
regulated utilities ability to obtain short and long-term
capital financing. In the monopoly environment, utility rates
were set basing them on the cost of providing service, plus a
reasonable return on the utility's investment, a process known
as "cost-of-service" ratemaking. Under that scheme, cost
recovery was virtually guaranteed for the monopoly telephone
companies. The telecommunications industry has undergone
significant changes since the initial grant of CPUC oversight
authority. Today, the ratesetting process for Pacific Bell and
GTE California (GTE) uses an incentive-based price-cap in which
shareholders bear the entire risk of the operations and
financial decisions of the company, and customers are shielded
from poor financing decisions of the utilities management. This
bill delegates the responsibility for making sound decisions on
management parallel to the current regulatory mechanism and
market environment.
GTE, the sponsor of this bill, indicates that they have had to
forego opportunities to obtain more favorable financing terms
because the current CPUC oversight process takes a minimum of
three months to complete. The California Telephone Association
asserts that by giving CPUC the ability to exempt the state's
largest local exchange carriers from onerous review and approval
of utility financing delegates great responsibility on the
management of those carriers.
Analysis Prepared by : Carolyn Veal-Hunter / U. & C. / (916)
319-2083
AB 1082
Page 3
FN: 0005544