BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
AB 994 (Wright)
Hearing Date: 6/26/00 Amended:
6/19/00
Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: E, U&C 8-0
____________________________________________________________
___
BILL SUMMARY: AB 994, relating to telephone rates and rural
telephone cooperatives, would do the following:
1) Extend from 1/1/01 to 1/1/05, provisions which require
the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to maintain a program
to establish a local rate structure designed to reduce
disparities in rates charged by small, independent
telephone corporations. The program includes a surcharge
on telephone customers in urban and suburban areas in order
to provide a subsidy to the 167 smallest telephone
companies in the state.
2) Require the PUC to open a proceeding to adopt consumer
protection rules.
3) Require the PUC to submit a report by 1/1/02 on the
feasibility of establishing rural telephone cooperatives or
other alternative service configurations to promote rural
telephone service.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
Fund
Report $100 one time Special*
Proceeding Absorbed under existing workload
Specialschedule
* Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account
STAFF COMMENTS: The State Auditor estimates that three
percent of the rural population lives in areas where
traditional telephone service is not offered. It is
possible that cooperatives, customer-owned businesses in
which members purchase shares in the business to provide
capital for facilities, are a viable way to service this
population. No cooperatives exist in the state, though the
National Telephone Cooperative Association estimates that
two million residents in other states obtain service in
this manner.
Current law limits the charges that can be placed on a
telephone bill. The PUC has a proceeding underway to
establish consumer protections if and when that prohibition
expires. This proceeding is similar to the one required by
the bill.
The telephone subsidy is funded by all telephone ratepayers
via a surcharge on telephone bills. Those monies are
deposited in the California High Cost Fund - A. For the
past four years, the surcharge has been zero because the
program expenses have been paid from the fund balance
collected in prior years. In 2000, it is estimated that
seven telephone companies will receive $6.9 million from
the CHCF - A. In 1999, the total cost of the program was
$4.9 million.