BILL ANALYSIS Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary AB 994 (Wright) Hearing Date: 6/26/00 Amended: 6/19/00 Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: E, U&C 8-0 ____________________________________________________________ ___ BILL SUMMARY: AB 994, relating to telephone rates and rural telephone cooperatives, would do the following: 1) Extend from 1/1/01 to 1/1/05, provisions which require the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to maintain a program to establish a local rate structure designed to reduce disparities in rates charged by small, independent telephone corporations. The program includes a surcharge on telephone customers in urban and suburban areas in order to provide a subsidy to the 167 smallest telephone companies in the state. 2) Require the PUC to open a proceeding to adopt consumer protection rules. 3) Require the PUC to submit a report by 1/1/02 on the feasibility of establishing rural telephone cooperatives or other alternative service configurations to promote rural telephone service. Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Fund Report $100 one time Special* Proceeding Absorbed under existing workload Specialschedule * Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account STAFF COMMENTS: The State Auditor estimates that three percent of the rural population lives in areas where traditional telephone service is not offered. It is possible that cooperatives, customer-owned businesses in which members purchase shares in the business to provide capital for facilities, are a viable way to service this population. No cooperatives exist in the state, though the National Telephone Cooperative Association estimates that two million residents in other states obtain service in this manner. Current law limits the charges that can be placed on a telephone bill. The PUC has a proceeding underway to establish consumer protections if and when that prohibition expires. This proceeding is similar to the one required by the bill. The telephone subsidy is funded by all telephone ratepayers via a surcharge on telephone bills. Those monies are deposited in the California High Cost Fund - A. For the past four years, the surcharge has been zero because the program expenses have been paid from the fund balance collected in prior years. In 2000, it is estimated that seven telephone companies will receive $6.9 million from the CHCF - A. In 1999, the total cost of the program was $4.9 million.