BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



SENATE RULES COMMITTEE                            AB 433  
Office of Senate Floor Analyses
1020 N Street, Suite 524
(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) 327-4478
                                                              
                                                          .

                        THIRD READING
                                                              
                                                          .
  
Bill No:  AB 433
Author:   Hertzberg (D)
Amended:  6/16/97 in Senate
Vote:     21
                                                              
                                                             
  .  

  SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 6/10/97
AYES:  Vasconcellos, Rainey, Burton, Kopp, McPherson,  
  Polanco, Schiff, Watson

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  64-10, 5/14/97 - See last page for vote
                                                              
                                                          .

SUBJECT  :    County investigators

  SOURCE  :     Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
                                                              
                                                          .

DIGEST  :    This bill would allow county auditor-controllers  
and finance directors specified access to financial  
information when investigating fraud against the county.

This bill provides that these county employees, who are not  
peace officers, be able to exercise powers of peace  
officers which would be the power of arrest, power to serve  
warrants, and access to summary history criminal  
information.

  ANALYSIS  :    This bill has two parts which relate to county  
auditor-controllers and directors of finance.  

The first part of the bill deals with access to financial  
records.






Existing law, the California Right to Financial Privacy  
Act, protects the confidentiality between financial  
institutions and their customers and grants disclosure of  
financial information for specified purposes and by  
specified procedures.

Under current law, specific entities and agencies are  
allowed to access financial records under specified  
conditions.  Some of these entities are police and  
sheriff's departments and district attorneys when a crime  
report has been filed which involves the alleged fraudulent  
use of drafts, checks or other orders drawn upon a bank.   
Further, in specified circumstances, the Attorney General,  
State Board of Equalization, Franchise Tax Board, and the  
Controller have access to information regarding whether the  
person has an account(s) at the office or branch and any  
identifying numbers of the account(s).

Under current law, it is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to  
one year in jail or a fine up to $5,000 or both, to intend  
to violate, knowingly participate, induce, or attempt to  
induce a person to release any financial information not  
authorized in current law.

This bill would allow a county auditor-controller or  
director of finance to obtain financial information when  
investigating fraud against the county.  This financial  
information is limited to whether the person has an  
account(s) at the office or branch, and if so, to obtain  
any identifying numbers of the account or accounts.

This bill states that a county auditor-controller or  
director of finance who unlawfully discloses information he  
or she is authored to request in this bill would be guilty  
of the unlawful disclosure set forth in current law,  
Section 7485 of the Government Code.  This misdemeanor  
would be punishable by up to one year in jail or a fine up  
to $5,000, or both.

The second part of the bill grants investigators employed  
by county auditor-controllers and directors of finance  
limited powers of peace officers.

Under current law, specified persons who are not peace  
officers are granted certain powers of peace officers.   
These people may exercise the powers of arrest, serve  
warrants, and obtain summary criminal history information  
if they complete training prescribed by the Commission on  
Peace Officer Standards and Training.






Under existing law, persons who may be granted the power of  
arrest, warrant, and obtaining summary criminal history  
peace officers include persons employed by the Department  
of Real Estate, State Lands Commission, Investigations  
Bureau of the Department of Insurance, and Public Utilities  
Commission.

Under current law, notwithstanding any other law, people  
who are not peace officers but may exercise the specified  
powers of peace officers may not carry firearms.

Current law allows various employees to exercise the power  
of arrest.  Some of these employees are persons designated  
by a cemetery authority, persons employed as security  
officers for institutions of higher education, and persons  
appointed by the Executive Director of the California  
Museum of Science and Industry.

This bill would grant persons employed as investigators of  
an auditor-controller or director of finance of any county,  
or persons employed by a city and county who conduct  
investigations under the supervision of the controller of  
the city and county, the powers of arrest, to serve  
warrants, and to obtain summary criminal history  
information with specified exceptions.

This bill would require all county auditor-controllers and  
finance directors who would be given the specified powers  
to complete peace officer training requirements.  Each  
individual would have to satisfactorily complete an  
introductory course of training prescribed by the  
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training,  
demonstrated by passage of an appropriate examination  
developed or approved by the commission.

This bill states that the individuals must be regularly  
employed and paid in the capacity of an investigator and  
that their primary duty must be to engage in investigations  
related to the theft of funds or the misappropriation of  
funds or resources or investigations related to the duties  
of the auditor-controller or finance director.

The purpose of this bill is to grant county  
auditor-controllers and directors of finance additional  
access to financial records and limited powers of peace  
officers for purposes of county investigations.

  Prior Legislation  






SB 1672 (Rosenthal), Chapter 1066, Statutes of 1996, passed  
the Senate
31-0.

AB 2713 (Conroy), Chapter 1065, Statutes of 1996, passed  
the Senate 31-1 (Noes:  Lewis).

AB 3351 (Weggeland), Chapter 1064, Statutes of 1996, passed  
the Senate 37-0.

  FISCAL EFFECT  :   Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes

  SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/26/97)

Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
Urban Counties Caucus
City and County of San Francisco
Controller's Audits Division of the City and County of San  
Francisco
County of Los Angeles Department of Auditor-Controller
County of Sacramento Department of Finance
County of San Diego Auditor and Controller
County of Fresno Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector

  OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/26/97)

California Attorneys for Criminal Justice

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The sponsor of this bill, the Los  
Angeles County Board of Supervisors, states:

"Under current law, only peace officers and specifically  
designated employees of State agencies have the authority  
to serve search warrants and to obtain financial, criminal,  
motor vehicle and other information during investigations.   
Assembly Bill 433 authorizes investigators of county  
auditor-controller offices to receive information from  
financial institutions during fraud investigations and to  
serve warrants or receive criminal information during  
investigations of theft of funds or misappropriation of  
funds.  Unlawful disclosure of any investigative  
information would be punished as a misdemeanor."

Further, the sponsor states that the auditor-controller  
investigators generally work on matters involving theft or  
embezzlement of county funds, and L.A. County has been  
hampered by not being able to receive certain information  
which would have helped in an investigation.






The sponsor and supporters of this bill also argue that  
this bill would allow them to access information in a more  
timely matter than they currently are allowed to do since  
they must go through their local law enforcement and  
district attorney.  The County of Sacramento states that  
their Auditor-Controller Division maintains an audit  
"hotline" for taxpayers to report fraud, waste and abuse in  
county government.  After the county receives complaints,  
the investigators need to complete their investigations in  
a timely manner, and allowing their investigators to obtain  
financial information directly will enhance their ability  
to perform investigations.

  ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    California Attorneys for  
Criminal Justice (CACJ) is opposed to this bill.  CACJ is  
concerned that granting the powers of arrest, to serve  
warrants, and to receive criminal history information could  
lead to an abuse of these powers by county  
auditor-controllers.  

ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
AYES:  Alby, Alquist, Aroner, Ashburn, Baca, Baldwin,  
  Battin, Baugh, Bowen, Bowler, Brewer, Brown, Campbell,  
  Cardenas, Cardoza, Cunneen, Davis, Ducheny, Escutia,  
  Figueroa, Firestone, Frusetta, Gallegos, Goldsmith,  
  Granlund, Havice, Hertzberg, Honda, House, Kaloogian,  
  Keeley, Knox, Kuehl, Kuykendall, Lempert, Machado,  
  Margett, Martinez, Mazzoni, McClintock, Migden,  
  Morrissey, Morrow, Murray, Napolitano, Ortiz, Pacheco,  
  Papan, Perata, Runner, Scott, Shelley, Strom-Martin,  
  Sweeney, Thomson, Torlakson, Villaraigosa, Vincent,  
  Washington, Wayne, Wildman, Woods, Wright, Bustamante
NOES:  Ackerman, Aguiar, Bordonaro, Floyd, Leach, Leonard,  
  Olberg, Oller, Takasugi, Thompson
NOT VOTING:  Caldera, Miller, Poochigian, Prenter, Pringle,  
Richter
  
  RJG:sl  6/27/97  Senate Floor Analyses
              SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE
                      ****  END  ****