BILL ANALYSIS
SB 122
SENATE THIRD READING
SB 122 (O'Connell) - As Amended: March 20, 1995
SENATE VOTE: 26-6
ASSEMBLY ACTIONS:
COMMITTEE L. GOV.VOTE 9-0COMMITTEE VOTE
DIGEST
Existing law prescribes the purposes and powers of community
services districts.
This bill permits the board of directors of the Ahmanson Ranch
Community Services District (CSD) to resolve and find that it is
economically sound, and in the public interest to exercise the
following specified powers:
1) Coordinating affordable housing programs;
2) Maintaining and repairing bicycle and multipurpose trails;
3) Maintaining slopes adjacent to public or private rights-of-way;
4) Providing the maintenance, operation and capital replacement of
community facilities including, but not limited to, government
buildings such as a town hall and a community maintenance
facility that provides capabilities for servicing the equipment
used to maintain public areas;
5) Maintaining entry and monument lighting;
6) Installing or planting and maintaining landscaping within
public street rights-of-way or easements within the district;
7) Modifying wildfire fuel on publicly-owned lands;
- continued
-
SB 122
Page 1
SB 122
8) Providing library services; and
9) Providing transportation programs, including school busing.
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown
COMMENTS
1) According to Maggie Kildee, a Supervisor from Ventura County,
in November 1993, "Ventura County approved the creation of the
Ahmanson Ranch CSD, a 2,800-acre area to develop over the next 25
years into a community including commercial centers, parks,
shopping areas, community facilities and more than 2,700 single
family homes. To circumscribe governance and the costs for the
proposed development it is necessary that the Ahmanson CSD be
given additional powers . . . ."
The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) in Ventura County
notes that the Ahmanson Ranch CSD's approval is contingent on
passage of the additional powers conferred through this bill.
On this point, the Legislature should consider inserting
language providing for LAFCO approval of these additional
powers, consistent with existing law (e.g., the Mountain House
CSD).
The additional powers sought are listed under "This bill:"
above.
2) CSDs can provide numerous services, including water and sewer
services, police and fire protection, airports and transportation
services, and libraries and ambulance services.
There is a question as to whether the Legislature should
continue to grant additional powers to CSDs as opposed to just
expanding existing law. The trend is for counties to use CSD
law to create what are effectively cities. This results in
CSD's taking on the characteristics of small cities.
- continued
-
SB 122
Page 2
SB 122
3) a) According to the Senate Local Government Committee
analysis, "CSDs finance their services with special taxes, standby
and availability charges, service rates, general obligation bonds,
and revenue bonds. CSDs' improvement districts may also levy
benefit assessments to acquire and maintain facilities."
b) The Ahmanson Ranch CSD is to be financed through an annual
special tax levy with a maximum parcel charge. This charge is
determined by a majority vote of the board of directors of the
Ahmanson Ranch CSD on the basis of estimated revenues required.
The special tax will be noticed to each purchaser prior to
the purchase of property.
4) "Coordinating affordable housing programs" language may need
further clarification with respect to existing programs.
5) If "modification of wildfire fuel on public lands" means fire
prevention, this should be clearly stated. The word
"modification" is somewhat unclear.
Additionally, the term "on publicly-owned lands" raises a
potential infringement on the jurisdiction of a fire protection
district. This issue could be taken up by the LAFCO, but may
be addressed here.
6) "School busing" is typically undertaken by a school district;
the necessity of this provision should be addressed. It is
unclear why this service would be funded through special tax
revenues instead of services charges.
FN 015487
- continued
-
SB 122
Page 3