BILL ANALYSIS
Bill No: AB
1042
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
Senator Ralph C. Dills, Chair
1995-96 Regular Session
Staff Analysis
AB 1042 Author: Alpert
As Amended: June 26, 1996
Hearing Date: July 2, 1996
Consultant: Steve Hardy
SUBJECT
Alcoholic Beverage License Denial
DESCRIPTION
1. AB 1042 would codify an existing Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulation that allows
ABC to deny issuance of a license for any premises for
which an application for a license has been denied or
revoked for specified reasons pertaining to the premises
unless one year has elapsed from the date the order
becomes final.
2. Prohibits a license from being issued for any premises
for which a license has been denied two times within a
36-month period, unless two years have elapsed from the
date the last order becomes final.
BACKGROUND
Current law provides that the ABC may deny an application
for a license if issuance would create a law enforcement
problem or result in or add to an undue concentration of
licenses. Additionally, existing law prohibits a license
from being issued for any premises for which an application
for a license has been denied, or revoked, for reasons
pertaining to the premises, unless one year has elapsed
from the date that order becomes final.
AB 1042 (Alpert) continued Page
2
The author is carrying this measure on behalf of the Linda
Vista Community Planning Committee. According to the
author, under existing law, it is possible for an entity to
apply for a license year after year. This causes those
opposing the issuance of this license, such as community
organizations and police departments to expend time and
resources in opposing the issuance of the license. In
Linda Vista, a community in San Diego which has an
excessive number of liquor licenses, citizens have spent
over 575 hours and given up $11,570 in wages fighting these
entities that continually reapply for licenses.
The sponsor and supporters believe that if enacted, this
measure would prohibit a license from being issued for any
premises for which a license has been denied or revoked two
times within a 36 month period, unless two years have
elapsed from the date that the last order becomes final.
In opposing this bill, the California Grocers Association
points out that
AB 1042 focuses on the premises rather than the operator.
It is the irresponsible operator, not the premises, that
causes a license to be revoked. If the irresponsible
operator manages to get his/her license revoked twice
within a 36 month period, the premises would be ineligible
for a license for two years, no matter who wished to
operate at that location.
SUPPORT: Linda Vista Community planning Committee
(Sponsor)
Peace Officers Research Association
of California
Committee on Moral Concerns
City of San Diego
California Council on Alcohol
Problems
AB 1042 (Alpert) continued Page
3
City of Oakland
OPPOSE: California Grocers Association
FISCAL COMMITTEE: No
**********
SMH:bjw