BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






SENATE HOUSING AND LAND USE COMMITTEE   VERSION:     05/30/95    A  
Senator Tom Campbell, Chairman          SET:         First       B
                                        HEARING:     07/03/95
                                        FISCAL:      Approp.     1  
 Assembly Bill 151 - Baca                CONSULTANT:  Yee         5
                                                                 1
                                                                  

          CHLORINATED-POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE (CPVC) PIPE


 Background  and  Existing  Law: 

The International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO)  
publishes the Uniform Plumbing Code and other related codes  
every three years.  The California Building Standards Code  
(also known as Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations)  
contains ICBO's model codes and building construction  
standards and regulations that are adopted by the California  
Building Standards Commission (CBSC).  Although ICBO's model  
code permits the use of chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC)  
pipes, the California Building Standards Code prohibits its  
use in California.  

The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)  
promulgates residential building standards and forwards them  
to the CBSC for adoption.  Since 1979, HCD has been embroiled  
in a controversial attempt to complete an environmental impact  
report (EIR) to evaluate the use of CPVC pipes.  In 1989, a  
draft EIR was completed which found no significant harmful  
effects of the plastic pipe.  But, the EIR was never adopted  
because of continuing challenges to its accuracy and  
completeness by various groups.

Plagued by copper water system failures, the City of Colton  
allowed homes to be retrofitted with CPVC pipes.  Using the  
plastic pipe has been successful but HCD challenged their use  
for potable water systems within residential uses.  The author  
wants to allow the use of CPVC pipes.

   Proposed  Law:

Assembly Bill 151 establishes following interim requirements  












that permit local governments to allow the use of chlorinated  
polyvinyl chloride piping:

   o Specifies that the California Plumbing Code's prohibition  
   to use CPVC pipe shall not apply to local governments that  
   permitted its usage for potable water systems before  
   January 1, 1996.

   o Allows local governments to permit the use of CPVC pipe  
   if they make a finding that there have been failures of  
   copper piping within its jurisdiction due to corrosive 









































AB 151 - 05/30/95 Page 3



water quality or soil conditions.  CPVC pipe must be listed as  
an approved material in the UPC.  Installation must be in  
accordance with UPC requirements and comply with interim  
flushing procedures and worker safety measures.

   o Requires the plumbers state licensing examination to  
   include one or more questions about the safe installation  
   of all types of plumbing pipe.

   o Specifies that nothing in this section shall affect the  
   applicability of any existing law imposing liability on a  
   manufacturer, distributor, retailer, installer, or any  
   other person or entity under the laws of this state for  
   liability. 

   o Requires HCD to complete and certify an environmental  
   impact report (EIR) relating to the use and installation of  
   CPVC piping systems within 15 months after receiving funds  
   from manufacturers and producers.

   o Requires HCD to immediately develop proposed building  
   standards to allow statewide use of CPVC piping systems if  
   the EIR reveals no significant negative impact concerning  
   the use of CPVC piping systems for potable water system.

   o Specifies a sunset date of January 1, 1998.

   o Includes an urgency clause.

AB 151 also establishes legislative intent that:

   o The deterioration of copper piping is a serious problem  
   in various communities in the state.

   o Chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) plastic piping has  
   been successfully used in other states and nations and is  
   also used in mobilehome construction.

   o The City of Colton approved the use of CPVC plastic for  
   residential use in good faith belief that it was in  
   compliance with state regulations when the city was  
   confronted with widespread deterioration of copper piping  









AB 151 - 05/30/95 Page 4



   systems.

   o CPVC pipe is not authorized to carry drinking water  
   inside California homes because an environmental impact  
   report delivered to HCD in December 1990 has not been  
   released and has therefore delayed its proposed adoption by  
   the State Building Standards Commission.

   o The retrofitting of homes with CPVC piping has been  
   successful.

   o CPVC piping be allowed as an alternate material in  
   building construction. 


 Arguments in Favor:

1.   Let it be.  Because of low pH (high acid) factors and high  
oxygen content of some California water, copper water systems  
have failed in many homes, causing devastating damage.  Acting  
pursuant to a good-faith belief that it was in compliance with  
state regulations, the City of Colton authorized the use of  
chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) pipe as an alternative  
to copper piping in 1993.  Although the use of CPVC piping has  
been successful, HCD challenged Colton's authority to allow  
its use.  AB 151 legalizes existing homes that have been  
retrofitted with CPVC piping and establishes interim  
requirements to allow CPVC piping in areas of the state that  
experience copper pipe problems. 

2.   Model code.  The Uniform Plumbing Code permits the use of  
CPVC pipe for hot and cold water systems.  Many other states  
and countries permit the use of CPVC piping.  HCD wants to  
permit the use of CPVC piping.  Shouldn't the California  
Plumbing Code permit the use of CPVC piping in area of the  
state that experiences problems with copper piping?     


 Arguments Against:

1.   Cart before the horse.  Before building materials are used  
in construction, they are tested to insure minimum standards.   









AB 151 - 05/30/95 Page 5



Testing procedures are established by ICBO's model code  
adoption process and the California Building Code adoption  
process.  AB 151 short-cuts the process by allowing the use of  
CPVC piping before the Building Standards Commission approves  
of its use.  The Committee may wish to consider whether AB 151  
would encourage other local governments to use building  
materials before they are approved by state officials.
 
2.   Funding by interested parties.  AB 151 allows the funding  
for the EIR to come from the CPVC pipe producers themselves.   
If the report is in the public interest, ought not the general  
fund, rather than interested parties, pay for it?  A dangerous  
precedent could be created for private parties to pay for  
state regulations or reports that they wish, taking precedence  
over other priorities of state agencies that lack private  
sources of financing.



































AB 151 - 05/30/95 Page 6



 Other Comments: 

1.   EIR streamlining.  In an attempt to promote affordable  
housing, HCD proposed changes to the Uniform Plumbing Code to  
allow plastic piping.  In 1989, HCD produced a draft  
environmental impact report (EIR) which found no significant  
negative effects of plastic piping.  The EIR was widely  
criticized by the pipe trades and other groups as "woefully  
inadequate."  The Attorney General also found that the  
document did not adequately respond to comments and required  
further work.  Insufficient funds halted the work on the EIR.   
AB 151 requires HCD to complete the EIR within 15 months after  
the funds are provided by manufacturers and producers.  

3.   Sunset date.  AB 151 establishes interim requirements for  
the use and installation of CPVC piping until HCD completes  
the EIR and changes the California Plumbing Code requirements  
to permit CPVC piping.  Anticipating that the process will not  
take over two years, AB 151 sunsets on January 1, 1998.

4.   A matter of urgency.  AB 151 includes an urgency clause  
because the deterioration of copper piping in water systems in  
homes make it necessary that the use of CPVC piping be clearly  
authorized by law under specified conditions.


 Assembly Actions:

     Housing & Community Development:   8-0
     Appropriations Committee:         11-0
     Floor:                            59-7


 Support and Opposition:  (06/28/95)

 Support:  BF Goodrich Specialty Chemicals, California  
Apartment Association, California Association of Realtors,  
California Building Industry Association, California State  
Council of Laborers, City of Colton Community Development  
Department, City of Highland, Costain Homes, County of Glenn,  
IPS Corporation, John Laing Homes.










AB 151 - 05/30/95 Page 7



 Opposition:  California Legislative Conference of the  
Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry, Contractors State  
License Board.