BILL ANALYSIS SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Bill Lockyer, Chairman 1993-94 Regular Session AB 477 (Horcher) As amended June 3 Hearing date: July 13, 1993 Penal Code ART:GML TRANSPORT OF DISABLED HORSES HISTORY Source: Horse Care Prior Legislation: None Support: Horse Care; California State Horsemen's Association; California Federation for Animal Legislation; Humane Farming Association; Contra Costa Humane Society; Fund for Animals; PAW PAC; Horse Power; Last Chance for Animals; Humane Society of the United States; Humane Farming Action Fund; several individuals Opposition: No known Assembly Floor vote: Ayes 69 - Noes 3 KEY ISSUE SHOULD IT BE A MISDEMEANOR FOR A PERSON TO CAUSE A DISABLED HORSE, šOR SIMILAR ANIMAL TO BE TRANSPORTED FOR PURPOSES OF COMMERCIAL šSLAUGHTER? PURPOSE Existing law provides that it is a misdemeanor to cause any animal što be transported in a vehicle in an unnecessarily cruel or šinhumane manner. This bill would make it a misdemeanor to cause a disabled, as (More) AB 477 (Horcher) Page 2 defined, horse, mule, pony, or burro to be sold, loaded or štransported out of state for purposes of commercial slaughter. The purpose of this bill is to clarify that it is unlawful to štransport a disabled horse out of state for purposes of slaughter. COMMENT 1. Stated need for legislation According to the sponsors, though existing law prohibits animals from being transported in cruel or inhumane ways, some disabled horses continue to be transported to slaughterhouses. Supporters claim that many disabled horses are subjected to pain and suffering or even die in transit. In a recent court case involving injured horses being sent out of the state to slaughter, a judge found that portions of California's 100-year old animal protection statutes were unconstitutionally vague because they failed to give adequate notice as to what conduct was proscribed. This bill is an attempt to clarify the more general animal cruelty statute. 2. Background 500,000 horses are slaughtered each year in the U.S. Most of these horses are first transported to the Midwest, Texas, or Canada where they are slaughtered and processed for human consumption in Europe and Asia. Both healthy and sick or disabled animals are currently auctioned for slaughter. 3. Court case The court case cited by the author as one of the reasons for this bill, resulted in an unpublished decision by a Fresno Superior Court. It would have no precedental value as far as influencing other courts in their interpretations of animal cruelty laws. The court found that the language in P.C. Sec.597a is impermissibly vague and fails to give adequate notice as to what conduct is proscribed. The use of the phrase "unnecessary torture, suffering, or cruelty of any kind," seemed to imply the possibility of "necessary torture, suffering, or cruelty". WOULD NOT THIS PROBLEM BE REMEDIED BY SIMPLY DELETING THE WORD "UNNECESSARY" FROM THE ORIGINAL STATUTE? 4. Definition of disabled For purposes of this bill, "disabled animal" includes but is not limited to, any animal that has broken limbs, is unable to (More) AB 477 (Horcher) Page 3 stand and balance itself without assistance, cannot walk, or is severely injured. 5. Self-regulation The California State Horsemen's Association claims that the bill would allow the horse industry to self-regulate since it would give shippers of horses reason to refuse to transport disabled animals out of state. Instead, disabled horses could be euthanized or sold for pet food in California. *********** (More)