BILL ANALYSIS Ķ SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator Wieckowski, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: SB 1301 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Hertzberg | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |-----------+-----------------------+-------------+----------------| |Version: |4/7/2016 |Hearing | 4/20/2016 | | | |Date: | | |-----------+-----------------------+-------------+----------------| |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Rebecca Newhouse | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Natural gas: greenhouse gas allowance: allocation ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (also known as AB 32), requires the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to determine the 1990 statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions level and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit that is equivalent to that level, to be achieved by 2020, and to adopt GHG emissions reductions measures by regulation. ARB is authorized to include the use of market-based mechanisms to comply with these regulations. (Health and Safety Code §38500 et seq.) 2) Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to require revenues received by an electrical corporation as a result of the direct allocation of greenhouse gas allowances to electric utilities, to be credited directly to the residential, small business, and emissions-intensive trade-exposed retail customers of the electrical corporation. 3) Authorizes CPUC to allocate up to 15% of the revenues received by an electrical corporation as a result of the direct allocation of greenhouse gas allowances to electrical distribution utilities for clean energy and energy efficiency projects established pursuant to statute that are administered by the electrical corporation, or a qualified third-party administrator as approved by the commission, and SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 2 of ? that are not otherwise funded by another funding source. This bill: 1) Authorizes CPUC to require up to 25% of revenues received by a gas corporation as a result of the direct allocation of greenhouse gas allowances to natural gas suppliers for clean energy and energy efficiency projects or programs approved by the CPUC. 2) Requires any clean energy or energy efficiency program or project funded under the bill be able to quantify and report GHG emissions reductions. 3) States that "clean energy" project or program may include: a) Support for the development, deployment, interconnection, or use of pipeline biogas; b) Support for the development, deployment, or use of alternative transportation fuels; c) Any other project or program that reduces or abates GHGs related to the use of fossil natural gas. 4) States that "energy efficiency" projects or programs may include the reduction of fossil natural gas consumption through more efficient appliances, heating, cooling, industrial use, or other end uses. 5) Specifies that clean energy and energy efficiency projects or programs may also include those established pursuant to statute that are administered by the gas corporation, the commission, or a qualified third-party administrator approved by the commission. 6) Requires CPUC to require each gas corporation to annually report and post on its website all expenditures of these revenues and the quantified reductions in GHGs from projects or programs funded under the bill. Background 1) Short-lived climate pollutants. Greenhouse gases or climate pollutants, such as CO2, work to warm the earth by trapping SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 3 of ? solar radiation in the earth's atmosphere. Depending on the molecule, these pollutants can vary greatly in their ability to trap heat and the length of time they remain in the atmosphere. CO2 remains in the atmosphere for centuries, which makes it the most critical greenhouse gas to reduce in order to limit long-term climate change. However, climate pollutants including methane, tropospheric ozone, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and soot (black carbon), are relatively short-lived (anywhere from a few days to a few decades), but when measured in terms of how they heat the atmosphere (global warming potential, or GWP), can be tens, hundreds, or even thousands of times greater than that of CO2. These climate forcers are termed short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). Because SLCPs remain in the atmosphere for a relatively short period of time, but have a much higher global warming potential than CO2, efforts aimed at reducing their emissions in the near term would result in more immediate climate, air quality, and public health benefits, than a strategy focused solely on CO2. According to ARB's SLCP draft strategy, "while the climate impacts of CO2 reductions take decades or more to materialize, cutting emissions of SLCPs can immediately slow global warming and reduce the impacts of climate change." Recent research estimates that SCLPs are responsible for about 40% of global warming to date and that actions to significantly reduce SLCP emissions could cut the amount of warming that would occur over the next few decades by half. According to ARB's 2015 updated AB 32 Scoping Plan, methane is one of the three short-lived climate pollutants with the greatest implications for California. Methane (CH4) is the principal component of natural gas and is also produced biologically under anaerobic conditions in ruminants, landfills, and waste handling. Atmospheric methane concentrations have been increasing as a result of human activities related to agriculture, fossil fuel extraction and distribution, and waste generation and processing. Methane is 84 times more powerful as a global warming pollutant than CO2 on a 20-year time scale. 2) Cap and trade background. Pursuant to authority under AB 32 SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 4 of ? (Nuņez, Pavley, Statutes of 2006, Chapter 488), ARB approved cap-and-trade regulations in December of 2011. Beginning on January 1, 2013, the cap-and-trade regulation sets a firm, declining cap on total GHG emissions from sources that make up approximately 85% of all statewide GHG emissions. Sources included under the cap are termed "covered" entities. The cap is enforced by requiring each covered entity to surrender one "compliance instrument" for every metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) that it emits at the end of a compliance period. Over time, the cap declines, resulting in GHG emission reductions. Compliance instruments include allowances and offsets, where allowances are generated by the state in an amount equal to the cap, and offsets result from emission reductions achieved in an uncapped sector pursuant to an approved protocol adopted by ARB. Offsets may be used to satisfy up to 8% of a covered entity's compliance obligation. The program authorizes entities to buy or sell their allowances, creating a market that is intended by ARB to minimize the cost of compliance and encourage entities to invest in GHG emissions reductions Other than a small percentage of allowances used for a cost-containment reserve, allowances are either freely provided to entities or sold at quarterly auctions. Auction proceeds, other than proceeds resulting from electric and natural gas Investor Owned Utility (IOU) allowances, are deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), and subject to various requirements for their use, including that they must facilitate the achievement of GHG emissions reductions. For the first two years, the cap-and-trade program only covered electricity generation, and large industrial sources and processes with annual GHG emissions at or above 25,000 MTCO2e. In 2015, the program expanded to include transportation fuels and natural gas distributors. 3) Proceeds from consigned allowances are not GGRF moneys. ARB allocates allowances to electric utilities and natural gas suppliers, on the behalf of their ratepayers, to ensure that electric and natural gas ratepayers do not experience sudden increases in their utility bills associated with the cap-and-trade program. The regulation requires electrical IOUs to consign all of their allocated allowances to auction. SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 5 of ? Natural gas utilities are required to consign 30% of their allocated allowances to auction in 2016, increasing up to 50% in 2020. These consigned allowances are then sold at auction, and the proceeds are returned to the utilities. These proceeds are not deposited in the GGRF, and are not subject to the requirements of GGRF moneys in statute. The cap-and-trade regulation, however, does require the moneys be used for the benefit of ratepayers, consistent with the goals of AB 32, and specifies that the proceeds may not be used for the benefit of entities or persons other than such ratepayers. Publicly owned utilities (POUs) are not required to consign their allowances. However, both IOUs and POUs are required to use the value associated with these allowances for the benefit of their ratepayers. 4) Electric utility revenues. SB 1018 (Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 39, Statutes of 2012) requires that CPUC oversee the return of all electrical IOU-allocated allowance auction proceeds to their residential, small business, and emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) retail customers, except for up to 15% for approved clean energy and energy efficiency projects. CPUC has conducted a series of proceedings to determine how the IOUs should use allocated allowance value within this framework, and ruled that after compensating EITE entities, offsetting electricity rate impacts of the cap-and-trade program on small businesses, and residential customers, the remaining revenues would be awarded as a "California Climate Credit"-small business customers receive the rebate each month on their electric bill, and residential households receive the credit each April and October. According to CPUC, the 2016 California Climate Credit comes out to an annual payment to each ratepayer ranging from $35 to $287. CPUC Decision 14-10-033 developed the procedures for approval of an electrical IOU clean energy or energy efficiency project funded through auction proceeds. To date, CPUC has not approved any specific projects. SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 6 of ? 5) Natural gas utility revenues. There are several natural gas IOUs in the state, including PG&E, Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), SDG&E, and Southwest Gas Company (SWG). ARB's cap-and-trade regulation requires the natural gas IOUs to use the proceeds of the auctions exclusively for the benefit of ratepayers, subject to the direction of CPUC, just as it does the auction revenues of the electrical IOUs. Similarly to what CPUC decided for electrical IOUs, on October 23, 2015, CPUC adopted a decision directing natural gas IOUs' use of auction revenues that requires the natural gas IOUs to return allowance proceeds to ratepayers as a non-volumetric (not based on usage) bill credit. CPUC refers to the bill credit as the natural gas California Climate Credit. According to CPUC, the natural gas California Climate Credit equates to roughly $20 annually to each ratepayer. Comments 1) Purpose of Bill. According to the author, the state has several policies aimed at reducing or displacing fossil natural gas consumption, largely under the rubric of combatting climate change. The author notes that achieving these goals will require new investments in infrastructure and technology that meaningfully replaces fossil energy sources, including petroleum and fossil natural gas. The author also states that the development of pipeline biogas and bioenergy is a key recommendation from the CEC's Bioenergy Action Plan. However, according to the author, the problem is that these infrastructure and technology investments are costly. SB 1301 addresses this issue by authorizing CPUC to reserve up to 25% of natural gas utility auction revenue for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. The author states that this bill is needed because the Legislature has not yet weighed in on how the gas utility cap-and-trade auction revenues should be used. He adds that given the many shared benefits of biogas and energy efficiency, SB 1301 attempts to address these costs and help develop the new, coordinated, infrastructure necessary to achieve our environmental goals. 2) Legislature weighing in. As noted in the background, SB 1018 in 2012 provided statutory direction for the spending of SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 7 of ? cap-and-trade auction proceeds from consigned electric IOUs allowances, and authorizes up to 15% of those proceeds for clean energy and energy efficiency projects. There has been no similar statutory direction for proceeds consigned by natural gas IOUs, newly covered under the cap-and-trade program in 2015. Even so, CPUC has the authority to direct those proceeds for the benefit of the ratepayer, and pursuant to that authority, they completed a rulemaking process last year to specify that natural gas utility proceeds be returned to customers as a $20/year credit. According to CPUC, a 25% allocation of the proceeds would result in $40 to $60 million annually for clean energy and energy efficiency projects specified in SB 1301, and would reduce the natural gas California Climate Credit by about $5. For a dollar amount likely to go unnoticed by the average consumer, these moneys may work to offset high costs associated with biogas interconnection and development of alternative and renewable fuels. 3) Taking a holistic look. Although SB 1301 does not propose to use GGRF moneys, the proceeds that would be allocated to clean energy and energy efficiency programs specified in SB 1301 also originate from the cap-and-trade auction. The clean energy and energy efficiency projects, in reducing fossil fuel natural gas, would be working to meet similar climate goals as several proposed and current programs funded through GGRF. Since directing these revenues from consigned allowances to similar types of projects may reduce some of the need to spend GGRF in the same sector, it may be advantageous to consider this proposal with GGRF proposals to better assess which set of proposals best meets the requirements of the fund, uses resources most efficiently, maximizes policy objectives moneys, and is not already funded through other programs. As the budget committees are considering the Governor's proposal of GGRF expenditures, the budget process may be an ideal way to comprehensively consider the numerous policy bills that propose programs for GHG emissions reductions funded through auction proceeds, including SB 1301. 4) PUC will decide. SB 1301 specifies that a "clean energy" SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 8 of ? program may be any project or program that reduces or abates GHG emissions related to the use of fossil natural gas. Additionally, the bill specifies that clean energy and energy efficiency projects or programs "may also include projects or programs of that type established pursuant to statute" and administered by PUC, the gas corporation, or a third-party. As these provisions are very broad, projects authorized under this bill could capture a whole host of activities, including actions and activities that may later be required as a result of ARB's oil and gas regulations, or required pursuant to SB 1371. Ultimately, PUC will open a rulemaking to interpret and implement the provisions of this bill, and decide what constitutes an eligible "clean energy" and energy efficiency" project or program that reduces GHG emissions, and provides ratepayer benefits. However, as the author specifies this bill is needed because the Legislature has not weighed in on how the gas utility cap-and-trade auction revenues should be used, the author may wish to provide more clarity and legislative direction for PUC in determining which clean energy and energy efficiency projects and programs are eligible under this bill. DOUBLE REFERRAL: This measure was heard in Senate Energy, Utilities, and Communications Committee on April 5, 2016, and passed out of committee with a vote of 8-1. SOURCE: Author SUPPORT: None received OPPOSITION: None received SB 1301 (Hertzberg) Page 9 of ? -- END --