BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 763
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 14, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS
Luis Alejo, Chair
SB
763 (Leno) - As Amended July 8, 2015
SENATE VOTE: 30-10
SUBJECT: Juvenile products: flame retardant chemicals.
SUMMARY: Requires manufacturers of juvenile products
manufactured on or after July 1, 2016 to indicate on a label
whether or not the product contains added flame retardant
chemicals. Specifically, this bill:
1)Defines "juvenile product" as a product subject to the Home
Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act and intended for use by
infants and children younger than 12 years of age, such as a
bassinet, booster seat, infant car seat, changing pad, floor
play mat, highchair, highchair pad, infant bouncer, infant
carrier, infant seat, infant swing, infant walker, nursing
pad, nursing pillow, playpen side pad, playard, portable
hook-on chair, stroller, children's nap mat, and infant foam
crib mattress.
2)Defines "added flame retardant chemicals" as flame retardant
chemicals that are present in any juvenile product or
component thereof at levels above 1,000 parts per million.
SB 763
Page 2
3)Exempts products subject to state upholstered furniture
labeling requirements and specified federal flammability
standards from the requirements of the bill.
4)Exempts, when determining whether a product contains flame
retardants for purposes of the labeling requirements of the
bill, electric and electronic units or components, including,
but not limited to, power cords or power supply units, motor
assemblies, Bluetooth modules, vibration units, light and
sound units, and circuit boards and wiring. Authorizes the
chief of the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home
Furnishings and Thermal Insulation (BEARHFTI) to clarify the
exemption list in regulation.
5)Requires a manufacturer of juvenile products manufactured on
or after July 1, 2016 for retail sale in California to have a
label securely attached to the product, in plain view, stating
the following:
"The State of California has determined that this product
does not pose a serious fire hazard. The state has
identified many flame retardant chemicals as being known
to, or strongly suspected of, adversely impacting human
health or development.
The fabric, filling, and plastic parts of this product:
_____contains added flame retardant chemicals
_____contains NO added flame retardant chemicals"
6)Requires a manufacturer of juvenile products sold in
California to indicate the absence or presence of added flame
retardant chemicals by placing an "X" in one of the
appropriate blanks on the label.
SB 763
Page 3
7)Provides that the label for juvenile products shall comply
with the labeling requirements for the law label delineated in
Article 2, Title 4, California Code of Regulations (CCR) §
1126.
8)Requires the manufacturer of the juvenile product sold in
California to retain documentation to show whether flame
retardant chemicals were added. Provides that a written
statement by the supplier of each component of a juvenile
product attesting either that flame retardant chemicals were
added or not added shall be sufficient documentation.
9)Requires BEARHFTI to ensure compliance with the labeling and
documentation requirements in the bill.
10)Requires, upon request, a manufacturer of a juvenile product
sold in California to provide to BEARHFTI, within 30 days of
the request, documentation establishing the accuracy of the
flame retardant chemical statement on the label.
11)Requires BEARHFTI to assess fines between $2,500 and $15,000
in accordance with specified factors for the failure of the
manufacturer of the juvenile product to maintain or provide
the required documentation.
12)Provides that a manufacturer of juvenile products sold in
California and component suppliers shall be jointly and
severally liable for violations of the documentation required
by the bill.
13)Requires BEARHFTI to provide the Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) with a selection of samples from
juvenile products marked "contains NO added flame retardant
chemicals" for testing for the presence of added flame
retardant chemicals, as specified, and to reimburse DTSC for
the cost of testing.
14)Requires, no later than August 1st of each fiscal year,
SB 763
Page 4
BEARHFTI to assess available resources and to determine the
number of tests to be conducted in the corresponding fiscal
year.
15)Authorizes BEARHFTI, if DTSC's testing shows that a juvenile
product labeled as "contains NO added flame retardant
chemicals" is mislabeled because it contains added flame
retardant chemicals, to assess fines against manufacturers of
the juvenile product and component manufacturers to be held
jointly and severally liable for the violation.
16)Requires fines for mislabeling to be assessed in increasing
severity, from $1,000 to $10,000, depending on the frequency
of the violation and in accordance with specified factors.
17)Requires BEARHFTI to adjust all minimum and maximum fines
imposed for inflation every five years.
18)Authorizes BEARHFTI, if DTSC's testing shows that a juvenile
product labeled as "contains NO added flame retardant
chemicals" is mislabeled because it contains added flame
retardant chemicals, in addition to a fine or any other
request, to request that the label or juvenile products that
belong to the same stock keeping unit (SKU) currently produced
by the manufacturer be corrected to reflect that flame
retardant chemicals are added to the juvenile product, and to
request additional testing of more products belonging to the
same SKU at the manufacturer's expense.
19)Requires it to be the duty of BEARHFTI to receive complaints
from consumers concerning juvenile products sold in
California.
20)Authorizes BEARHFTI to adopt regulations to carry out the
requirements of the bill.
21)Codifies the current exemption from fire retardant
regulations applicable to specified juvenile products.
Includes two additional products in the exemption.
SB 763
Page 5
EXISTING LAW:
1)Establishes the Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act
(Act) and requires it to be administered by BEARHFTI within
the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). (BCP § 19000 et
seq.)
2)Requires protection of the public to be the highest priority
for BEARHFTI in exercising its licensing, regulatory, and
disciplinary functions. Requires, whenever the protection of
the public is inconsistent with other interests sought to be
promoted, the protection of the public to be paramount. (BCP
§ 19004.1)
3)Specifies that the Act applies to upholstered furniture,
bedding and filling materials, and insulation sold in
California regardless of its point of origin. (BCP § 19070)
4)Defines, in reference to upholstered furniture labeling
requirements, "flame retardant chemical" as any chemical or
chemical compound for which a functional use is to resist or
inhibit the spread of fire. Provides that flame retardant
chemicals include, but are not limited to, halogenated,
phosphorous-based, nitrogen-based, and nanoscale flame
retardants, flame retardant chemicals listed as "designated
chemicals" pursuant to Section 105440 of the Health and Safety
Code, and any chemical or chemical compound for which "flame
retardant" appears on the substance Safety Data Sheet. (BPC §
19094 (a)(3) and (4))
5)Requires a manufacturer of upholstered furniture to indicate
whether or not the product contains added flame retardant
chemicals by including a statutorily required "flame retardant
chemical statement" and an "X" indicating the presence of
flame retardant chemicals on the required flame retardant
(Technical Bulletin (TB) 117-2013) label. This label is
substantially similar to that required for juvenile products
SB 763
Page 6
included in this bill. (BPC § 19094 (b)(1))
6)Requires the manufacturer of upholstered furniture sold in
California to retain documentation to show whether flame
retardant chemicals were added to their products. (BPC § 19094
(c)(1))
7)Requires BEARHFTI to ensure compliance with the flame
retardant labeling and documentation requirements for
upholstered furniture. (BPC § 19094 (c)(2))
8)Requires, upon request, a manufacturer of upholstered
furniture sold in California to provide to BEARHFTI, within 30
days of the request, documentation establishing the accuracy
of the flame retardant chemical statement on the label. (BPC §
19094 (c)(3)(A))
9)Requires BEARHFTI to assess specified fines for the failure of
the manufacturer of upholstered furniture to maintain or
provide to BEARHFTI the documentation establishing the
accuracy of the flame retardant chemical statement on the
label. (BPC § 19094 (c)(3)(B))
10)Requires BEARHFTI to provide DTSC with a selection of samples
from upholstered furniture marked "contains NO added flame
retardant chemicals" for testing for the presence of added
flame retardant chemicals, as specified, and to reimburse DTSC
for the cost of testing. (BPC § 19094 (c)(3)(D)(i))
11)Requires all flexible polyurethane foam that is offered for
sale to the general public at retail outlets to be fire
retardant, as defined by BEARHFTI. (BPC § 19161.3)
12)Requires all mattresses and mattress sets manufactured for
sale in this state to be fire retardant. (BPC § 19161 (a))
13)Authorizes the chief of BEARHFTI, subject to the approval of
DCA, to in his or her discretion exempt items of upholstered
furniture which are deemed not to pose a serious fire hazard
SB 763
Page 7
from fire retardant requirements. (BPC § 19161.5)
14)Requires, under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement
Act of 1986 (Proposition 65), the Governor to cause a list to
be published of those chemicals known to the state to cause
cancer or reproductive toxicity, and to cause such list to be
revised and republished in light of additional knowledge at
least once per year. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25249.8)
15)Requires, under Safer Consumer Products (Green Chemistry)
statutes, DTSC to identify and prioritize chemicals of concern
and to adopt regulations to evaluate chemicals of concern in
consumer products to determine how best to limit exposure or
to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern.
Authorizes DTSC to take specified regulatory actions to limit
exposure or to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical
of concern. (HSC § 25251 et. seq.)
16)Prohibits a person from manufacturing, processing, or
distributing in commerce a product or part of a product that
contains more than 1/10th of 1% of pentaBDE or octaBDE. (HSC
§ 108922)
17)Requires, pursuant to TB 117-2013, beginning January 1, 2015,
all filling materials and cover fabrics contained in
upholstered furniture sold in California to meet certain
smolder resistant testing standards, and to be labeled as
specified. (Article 13, Division 3, Title 4, CCR § 1374)
18)Exempts from compliance with TB 117-2013 the following
juvenile products: bassinets, booster seats, car seats,
changing pads, floor play mats, highchairs, highchair pads,
infant bouncers, infant carriers, infant seats, infant swings,
SB 763
Page 8
infant walkers, nursing pads, nursing pillows, playpen side
pads, playards, portable hook-on chairs, and strollers.
(Article 13, Division 3, Title 4 , CCR §1374.2)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown.
COMMENTS:
Need for the bill: According to the author, "Growing evidence
show(s) that many fire retardant chemicals have serious human
and environmental health impacts, including cancer, decreased
fertility, hormone disruption, lower IQ, and hyperactivity. A
typical household can contain up to several pounds of these
chemicals, and their extensive use to meet TB 117 has led to
contamination of the global environment? Tests have found fire
retardant chemicals present in polyurethane foam in baby
products which are in intimate contact with infants and young
children including nap mats, bassinets, changing pads,
strollers, playpens, swings, nursing pillows, high chairs and
toddler chairs?
As is current law for furniture, consumers deserve the right to
make educated choices about purchasing children's products that
may include flame retardants associated with serious
developmental and health consequences. When consumers choose to
purchase safer products, they create a direct and positive
market signal that reduces toxic exposures for their families,
for firefighters, and for the environment?
SB 763 will give parents the information they need to choose
safe and healthy products for their children."
Flame retardant chemicals: Flame retardants are chemicals added
to plastic, foam, textiles, electronics, building materials, and
other products to resist or inhibit the spread of fire.
According to the American Chemistry Council, bromine,
phosphorus, nitrogen and chlorine are commonly used in flame
SB 763
Page 9
retardants. Inorganic compounds are also used in flame
retardants, either alone or as part of a flame retardant system
in conjunction with bromine, phosphorus or nitrogen.
Human exposure to flame retardants occurs mainly through
inhalation or ingestion of dust. Food and water contaminated
with flame retardants is another source of exposure. Exposure
from dermal contact with contaminated soil and dust may also
occur.
Contaminated dust enters households and the environment when
foam treated with flame retardant chemicals in upholstered
furniture and other products breaks down and escapes the product
as dust. Flame retardant chemicals also enter the environment
through manufacturing processes and through the disposal of
treated products. Medical studies have linked flame retardant
chemicals to job-related cancer and other illnesses in American
firefighters, indicating heightened exposure during fires.
Research conducted in 2014 by the Environmental Working Group
and Duke University found that young children typically have 3 -
5 times higher amounts of flame retardant chemicals in their
systems than do their mothers, and scientists believe it is
because they spend more time on the floor amongst contaminated
dust and put their hands (and other contaminated products) in
their mouths more frequently than do adults. Studies also show
that infants are also exposed to flame retardants through the
ingestion of breast milk.
Human health and environmental impacts of flame retardant
chemicals: According to the Green Science Policy Institute,
while not all flame retardants present concerns, the following
types often do: 1) halogenated flame retardants (also known as
organohalogen flame retardants) containing chlorine or bromine
bonded to carbon; and, organophosphorous flame retardants
containing phosphorous bonded to carbon.
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), the most thoroughly
studied of the flame retardant chemicals, have been found in
SB 763
Page 10
birds, fish, shellfish, amphibians, marine mammals, sewage
sludge, sediments, air samples, meats, dairy products, and even
vegetables. There has been extensive animal research over the
past decade indicating that PBDE exposure can lead to
abnormalities in learning, memory, and neurodevelopment, and
linking exposure to hyperactivity, endocrine disruption, and
other neurotoxicological effects.
In humans, PBDEs have been found to accumulate in blood, fat,
and breast milk. According to DTSC, the levels of PBDEs
measured in humans in the United States and Canada are typically
at least 10 times higher than those in Europe, and appear to be
doubling every few years. Recent research has shown that PBDE
exposure in humans may lead to endocrine disruption,
reproductive difficulty, neurodevelopmental issues, reduced IQ,
and elevated thyroid levels. Studies have found PBDEs in fetal
cord blood, indicating that these chemicals can cross the
placenta and expose fetuses during critical times of
development. American children with higher PBDE levels score
worse on assessments of learning and attention, and these
deficiencies persist throughout childhood.
While PBDEs have been largely phased out of use, alternative
flame retardant chemicals are pervasive and have raised similar
and other toxicological concerns to those raised by PBDE
formulations. Studies have linked exposure to many other flame
retardant chemicals to endocrine disruption; fertility issues;
and, carcinogenic, mutagenic, reprotoxic, obesogenic, and
neurotoxicological effects. The chemicals have also been found
to also be persistent and bioaccumulative.
Upholstered furniture flammability standard: BEARHFTI develops
flammability standards in the form of Technical Bulletins (TBs),
which are adopted through regulation. There are also a number
of other federal flammability standards developed by the United
States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), which are
currently in effect nationwide. While CPSC has been studying a
national residential upholstered furniture standard for several
years, California remains the only state with a residential
SB 763
Page 11
upholstered furniture flammability standard. However, since
California is such a large portion of the national market, most
manufacturers choose to meet California's standards for their
products sold across the country.
TB 117: In October 1975, BEARHFTI promulgated regulations that
resulted in the development of Technical Bulletin 117 (TB 117)
entitled, "Requirements, Test Procedures and Apparatus for
Testing the Flame Retardance of Filling Materials Used in
Upholstered Furniture." This mandatory performance standard
required that the concealed filling materials and cover fabric
of upholstered furniture undergo individual component testing to
ensure that they passed open flame and cigarette smolder tests.
The main emphasis of TB 117 was on the open flame testing of
interior filling materials, which had to withstand exposure to a
12-second small open flame. Manufacturers predominately met this
requirement through using polyurethane foam treated with flame
retardant chemicals.
In 2012, BEARHFTI determined that TB 117 did not adequately
address the flammability performance of upholstered furniture
cover fabric and its interactions with underlying filling
materials and that flame retardant foam can actually increase
smolder propensity. In addition, concerns were intensifying
about the negative human health and environmental impacts caused
by flame retardant chemicals. On June 18, 2012, Governor Brown
directed BEARHFTI to revise the flammability standards for
upholstered furniture sold in the state, saying "Toxic flame
retardants are found in everything from high chairs to couches
and a growing body of evidence suggests that these chemicals
harm human health and the environment. We must find better ways
to meet fire safety standards by reducing and
eliminating-wherever possible-dangerous chemicals."
TB 117- 2013: In recognition of TB 117's public safety
shortcomings, as well as noting the health concerns related to
flame retardant chemicals, BEARHFTI published TB 117- 2013,
SB 763
Page 12
entitled "Requirements, Test Procedure and Apparatus for Testing
the Smolder Resistance of Materials Used in Upholstered
Furniture," in November 2013. TB 117-2013 updates flammability
standards from the open flame method of testing to a smoldering
test. Manufacturers have indicated that they can comply with TB
117-2013 without the use of flame retardant chemicals. While TB
117-2013 became effective on January 1, 2014, manufacturers had
a year to complete the transition and come into full mandatory
compliance on January 1, 2015. TB 117-2013 supersedes TB 117.
Juvenile product exemption: In 2010, BEARHFTI found that some
juvenile products contain a much lesser fuel load content (i.e.
foam, batting) than average adult seating furniture. In
addition, these products are less likely to be ignited or come
in contact with an ignition source under the exercise of
reasonable care and supervision of adults. Therefore, in
December 2010, BEARHFTI published the finding that three
specified juvenile products (strollers, infant carriers, nursing
pillows) "will not pose a serious fire hazard to infants and
children if they are exempt from the TB 117 flammability
requirements," and updated its regulations to exempt those
products from TB 117. In November 2013, BEARHFTI again amended
regulations to exempt fifteen additional juvenile products from
meeting the flammability requirements of the now-in-effect TB
117-2013. The exempted juvenile products (total of eighteen)
are: bassinets, booster seats, car seats, changing pads, floor
play mats, highchairs, highchair pads, infant bouncers, infant
carriers, infant seats, infant swings, infant walker, nursing
pads, nursing pillows, playpen side pads, playards, portable
hook-on chairs, and strollers. This full exemption became
effective on January 1, 2014.
SB 763 requires that these eighteen juvenile products, plus
children's nap mats and infant foam crib mattresses (two
additional products that BEARHFTI has indicated are exempt from
TB 117-2013), be labeled to indicate whether or not they contain
added flame retardant chemicals.
Flame retardants in juvenile products: Despite an exemption
SB 763
Page 13
from California flammability standards, tests on juvenile
products show that these products continue to contain flame
retardant chemicals. For example, tests commissioned by the
Center for Environmental Health and performed by Duke University
in August 2014 on children's nap mats found that six of the 10
tested mats contained flame retardant chemicals. In another
example, in 2014 the State of Washington Department of Ecology
tested 10 changing pads and found that three contained flame
retardant chemicals. Additional recent testing by Duke
University found that of 17 nap mats purchased in April and May
2015, nearly a year and a half after the exemption from TB
117-2013 went into effect, three were identified as containing
flame retardant chemicals.
Current flame retardant labeling requirements: SB 1019 (Leno,
Chapter 862, Statutes of 2014), which became effective on
January 1, 2015, requires a manufacturer of upholstered
furniture regulated by TB 117-2013 to indicate on the product
label whether or not the product contains added flame retardant
chemicals.
The labeling requirements, enforcement provisions, and testing
protocols set forth in SB 1019 for flame retardant chemicals in
upholstered furniture are substantially similar to those
proposed in SB 763 for flame retardant chemicals in juvenile
products.
Safer Consumer Products regulations: AB 1879 (Feuer, Chapter
559, Statutes of 2008) enacted California's Safer Consumer
Product, or Green Chemistry, program, which requires DTSC to
identify, prioritize and evaluate chemicals of concern in
consumer products to determine how best to limit exposure or to
reduce the level of hazard posed by those chemicals. It also
authorizes DTSC to take regulatory action to limit exposure or
to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern.
On March 13, 2014, under the program, DTSC released its first
list of three "priority products," which are consumer products
identified by DTSC as containing one or more chemicals of
SB 763
Page 14
concern- known as "candidate chemicals" - that have a hazard
trait that can harm people or the environment. DTSC placed
products on list based on two criteria: 1) the products have the
potential to expose people or the environment to one or more
candidate chemicals, and 2) this exposure has the potential to
"contribute to or cause significant or widespread adverse
impacts." This list included children's foam-padded sleeping
products that contain the flame retardant chlorinated tris or
tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP).
Arguments in support:
The Center for Environmental Health argues, "Flame retardant
chemicals can migrate out of products into air and dust where
children are exposed to them. These chemicals are associated
with a variety of health concerns, including cancer, lower birth
weight, decreased fertility, hormone disruption, lower IQ, and
hyperactivity. Due to children's frequent hand to mouth
behavior, young children have 3-5 times higher levels of certain
flame retardants than their mothers. It is also of great
concern that children of color and children from low-income
communities of color have the highest exposure. Flame retardant
chemicals can cross the placenta and this chemical exposure
places babies at greater risk than adults because infants'
brains, organs, and reproductive systems are still developing?
This legislation would require manufacturers to label juvenile
products as to whether the product contains added flame
retardant chemicals. Without this type of label it will be
impossible for parents to identify products that either do or do
not contain flame retardant chemicals."
The California Professional Firefighters argue, "SB 763 provides
consumers a pathway to exercise a choice in purchasing safer
juvenile products, which, in turn, creates a direct and positive
impact on the reduction of toxic exposures to firefighters.
Consequently, SB 763 affords additional long-term cost-savings
to the state by aiding in reducing workers' compensation and
disability costs for firefighters through reducing the severity
SB 763
Page 15
and frequency at which our members incur job-caused illnesses
associated with prolonged exposure to hazardous flame retardant
chemicals and the associated toxins they convert to during
combustion? Further, science reveals that toxic retardants
provide minimal, if any, additional fire safety protection."
The Consumer Federation of California argues, "The proposed
disclosures would provide uniform information to consumers in a
simple and accessible manner. It would also provide businesses a
standard format to communicate the information to consumers."
Arguments in opposition:
The American Chemistry Council, along with a coalition of
industry groups, argues, "These proposed requirements lack
scientific justification, conflict with existing California
consumer product and chemical safety laws and regulations, and
as a result, mislead consumers about the potential safety of
these products? Just as there are different types of metals or
gases, California should recognize that there are many different
types of flame retardants with different exposure, health and
environmental profiles. Yet, under SB 763, manufacturers would
be required to label whether their product contains a flame
retardant chemical regardless of whether the particular chemical
presents any meaningful risk to human health or the
environment."
The Juvenile Product Manufacturer's Association (JPMA) argues,
"JPMA understands the importance of notifying consumers if a
product contains a flame retardant that has been found to be
harmful. However, SB 763 would also require a product
containing no flame retardants to be labeled as "not containing
flame retardants"? SB 763 would subject companies that do not
use flame retardants and are not presently subject to labeling
requirements, to comply with a new regulatory program that
requires record keeping and testing data when no potential harm
SB 763
Page 16
exists. This requirement will add significant burdens to
companies who are already complying with the Federal Hazardous
Substance Act, and the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act?
SB 763 requires a permanently affixed warning label which will
cost manufacturers hundreds of thousands of dollars, even when
their product does not contain flame retardants? JPMA believes
it is very important that labeling requirements provide
information to the consumer that is easily understood and does
not dilute the message it is trying to convey. This can be
accomplished in SB 763 by removing the labeling requirement for
products and components that do not contain intentionally added
flame retardants."
Recent related legislation:
1)SB 1019 (Leno), Chapter 862, Statutes of 2014, requires a
manufacturer of upholstered furniture to indicate on the
product label whether or not a product contains added flame
retardant chemicals.
2)AB 2197 (Mitchell, 2012), would have required BEARHFTI to
revise regulations to require all seating furniture sold or
offered for sale to meet a smolder flammability test rather
than an open flame-test. This bill was not heard in the
Assembly ESTM committee, at the author's request. Note: The
provisions of this bill were largely implemented through
regulation through the adoption of TB 117-2013.
3)SB 147 (Leno, 2011), would have required BEARHFTI, on or
before March 1, 2013, to modify the requirements for
flammability of upholstered furniture to include a smolder
flammability test as an alternative method of compliance.
This bill failed passage in the Senate Committee on Business,
Professions, and Economic Development. Note: The provisions
of this bill were largely implemented through regulation
through the adoption of TB 117-2013.
4)SB 1291 (Leno, 2010), would have required the DTSC to include,
as a chemical under consideration in the Green Chemistry
SB 763
Page 17
process, any chemical that is used, or is proposed to be used,
as a flame retardant. This bill was placed on the inactive
file on the Senate Floor and died on file.
5)SB 772 (Leno, 2009), would have exempted "juvenile products,"
as defined, from flame retardant regulations, unless BEARHFTI
determined that the juvenile product posed a serious fire
hazard. This bill was held under submission in the Assembly
Appropriations Committee. Note: The provisions of this bill
have been largely implemented through regulation.
6)AB 706 (Leno, 2008), would have required, commencing July 1,
2010, seating furniture and bedding products to comply with
certain requirements, including that they not contain a
chemical or component not in compliance with alternatives
assessment requirements, and would have required DTSC to adopt
methodology for an alternative assessment to review the
classes of chemicals used to meet fire retardant standards.
This bill failed passage on the Senate Floor.
7)AB 302 (Chan), Chapter 205, Statutes of 2003, banned the use
of penta and octa PBDEs after January 1, 2008.
Double referral: This bill passed the Assembly Committee on
Business and Professions on July 7, 2015, on a 12 - 0 vote.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Professional Firefighters (Co-Sponsor)
SB 763
Page 18
Center for Environmental Health (CEH) (Co-Sponsor)
Consumer Federation of California (CFC) (Co-Sponsor)
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
Alliance for Toxic Free Fire Safety (ATFFS)
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
District IX
Association of Regional Center Agencies (ARCA)
BANANAS
Breast Cancer Action
Breast Cancer Fund
CalFIRE Firefighters, Local 2881
California Chapters of the Solid Waste Association of North
America (SWANA)
California League of Conservation Voters
Californians for a Healthy & Green Economy
SB 763
Page 19
CALPIRG
Center for Environmental Health
Child Care Coordinating Council of San Mateo County (4Cs)
City and County of San Francisco
Clean Water Action
Coalition for Clean Air
Community Action Partnership of Madera County
Community Resources for Children
Consumer Attorneys of California
Contra Costa Child Care Council
Dignity Health
Earthjustice
Environment California
SB 763
Page 20
Environmental Working Group
First 5 Santa Clara County
Friends of the Earth
Go Kids
Grant David Gillham, Inc.
Health Care Without Harm
Instituto de Educación Popular del Sur de California
International Association of Fire Fighters
Latinas Contra Cancer
Mommy Greenest
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Naturepedic
Pathways LA
SB 763
Page 21
Pesticide Action Network North America
Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles
Physicians for Social Responsibility-San Francisco Bay Area
Chapter
Plumas Rural Services
San Francisco Bay Area Physicians for Social Responsibility (SF
Bay Area PSR)
Southern California Coalition for Occupational Safety & Health
Trauma Foundation
Opposition
American Chemistry Council
California Chamber of Commerce
California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse
California Manufacturers and Technology Association
Chemical Industry Council of California
Civil Justice Association of California
Fullerton Chamber of Commerce
Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association (JPMA)
National Federation of Independent Business
SB 763
Page 22
Southwest California Legislative Council
Analysis Prepared by:Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916)
319-3965