BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 467 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 467 (Hill) As Amended August 31, 2015 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 40-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Business & |13-1 |Bonilla, Jones, |Ting | |Professions | |Baker, Bloom, Campos, | | | | |Chang, Dodd, Eggman, | | | | |Gatto, Holden, | | | | |Mullin, Wilk, Wood | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |12-0 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta, | | | | |Calderon, Nazarian, | | | | |Eggman, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, Weber, | | | | |Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SB 467 Page 2 SUMMARY: Requires the Attorney General (AG) to submit annually specified reports and information to the Legislature; requires the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) to implement "Complaint Prioritization Guidelines," as specified; and extends the California Accountancy Board (CBA) and the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) until January 1, 2020. Specifically, this bill: 1) Requires the AG to submit a report to the DCA, the Governor, and the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature on or before January 1, 2018, and on or before January 1 of each subsequent year, that includes specific statistical information regarding accusation matters referred to the AG for each constituent entity within the DCA represented by the Licensing Section and Health Quality Enforcement Section of the Office of the AG. 2) Requires the Director of the DCA, through the Division of Investigation, to implement "Complaint Prioritization Guidelines" for boards to utilize in prioritizing their respective complaint and investigative workloads as part of the Consumer Protection Enforcement Initiative of 2010 (CPEI). 3) Extends the operation of the CBA until January 1, 2020. 4) Provides that the CBA, after notice and hearing may permanently restrict or limit the practice of a licensee or impose a probationary term or condition on a license that prohibits the licensee from performing/providing certain acts or services, as specified. 5) Extends the operation of the CSLB until January 1, 2020. SB 467 Page 3 6) Deletes the existing requirement that contractors maintain $2,500 in capital, and increases the existing surety bond requirement from $12,500 to $15,000. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Board of Accountancy: Projected expenditures of approximately $14.1 million annually (Accountancy Fund), supporting 98.8 Personnel Year (PY), to extend the sunset date until January 1, 2020, partially offset by annual fee revenues of approximately $5.4 million in 2015-16, based on the proposed 2015-16 budget. Annual fee revenues will increase to approximately $11 million annually beginning July 1, 2016. Minor and absorbable costs to DCA to extend the sunset and provide authority for the Board to place practice restrictions on licensees for disciplinary reasons. 2)The Department of Justice reports significant workload impacts and increased costs of approximately $1.45 million in 2015-16 ($537,000 GF and $911,000 Legal Services Revolving Fund (LSRF)), and ongoing costs of $1.8 million ($268,000 GF and $1.534 million LSRF) for the AG to compile data and develop, design, and prepare the required report. AG costs from the LSRF would be reimbursed from the funds of the referring boards and bureaus. 3)CSLB: Projected expenditures of approximately $63 million annually (primarily Contractors License Fund), supporting 405.6 PY, to extend the sunset date until January 1, 2020, partially offset by annual fee revenues of approximately $55-56 million, based on the proposed 2015-16 budget. Minor and absorbable costs to DCA to extend the sunset on the CSLB, SB 467 Page 4 and revise the financial security requirements for contractors. COMMENTS: Purpose. This bill is sponsored by the author. According to the author, this bill is "?necessary to extend the sunset date of the (CBA) in order to ensure continued oversight of accountancy profession?.This bill will also establish and enhance mandatory reporting requirements for the AG's office and require health care boards to prioritize complaints to assist policy makers in determining how best to solve the long standing problem of delayed disciplinary action. Also, this bill is necessary to extend the sunset date of CSLB in order to ensure continued oversight of the contractors industry." Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). The mission of DCA is to "protect and serve the interests of California consumers." By statute, consumer protection is the primary purpose for all of the regulatory programs located within DCA, which includes 26 boards, nine bureaus, two committees, one program, and one commission. Collectively, these entities regulate more than 100 types of businesses and 200 different industries and professions. During the March 2015, Sunset Review Hearing, and in the Senate Committee's Background Paper on the DCA, several issues were raised relating to the administration and operations of the DCA. This bill addresses some of those issues raised during the Sunset Review process regarding the DCA, including 1) prioritization of disciplinary cases, and 2) specific enforcement reporting requirements for the AG's Office. Consumer Protection Enforcement Initiative (CPEI). During the sunset review hearing, an issue was raised about the length of time the DCA's investigations process took to complete, and the relationship between the AG's office and the Office of SB 467 Page 5 Administrative Hearings (OAH). The AG's office must use the OAH to schedule and conduct the disciplinary hearings. The OAH is required to provide data for performance measures to review the length of time it takes to complete the complaint process. When completed, these performance measures provide an overview of the investigation process and allow the DCA and the Legislature to gauge the effectiveness of the CPEI. Missing from the performance measures is the information about the prosecution process once it arrives in the AG's office. Another essential part of the CPEI was enhancing the use of non-sworn investigative staff to conduct less complex investigations for the health care boards. The DCA issues "Complaint Prioritization Guidelines" for boards to utilize in prioritizing their respective complaint and investigative workloads. These guidelines established three categories of complaint identification: Urgent, High and Routine. Cases categorized as urgent or high would be investigated by sworn staff at the DCA's Department of Investigation (DOI). These guidelines coupled with training were designed to free up sown staff so that they could work on complex investigations. CPEI staffing enhancements were approved by the Legislature with this model in mind; however, it does not appear these guidelines are being followed by the boards under the DCA. To address this issue, this bill will require that the DCA, through the DOI, implement "Complaint Prioritization Guidelines" for boards to utilize in prioritizing their complaint and investigative workloads and to determine the referral of complaints to the division and those that are retained by the health care boards for investigation. California Accountancy Board (CBA). As a result of the CBA's recent sunset review, the Senate committee raised an issue pertaining to the CBA's inability to restrict, limit or place on probation a license rather than revoke. The CBA has the SB 467 Page 6 authority to revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew any permit or certificate, or censure the holder of that permit or certificate due to unprofessional conduct. However, the CBA does not have the authority to include permanent practice restrictions. Currently, practice restrictions may only be imposed beyond the probationary term when specifically agreed to by the licensee via a stipulated settlement. However, if the licensee is unwilling to agree to such terms via a stipulated settlement, the only recourse for the CBA is to seek revocation of the license. This bill would allow the CBA, and the ALJ, to include permanent practice restrictions as part of a disciplinary order, as opposed to seeking a complete license revocation, allowing the licensee to retain a license and be able to practice and earn income in such areas where competency is not compromised. Contractors State Licensing Board (CSLB). Business and Professions Code (BPC) Section 7067.5 requires that all applicants and all licensees at renewal, demonstrate, as evidence of financial solvency, that his or her operating capital exceeds $2,500. The applicant shall provide answers to questions contained in a standard form questionnaire as required by the Registrar relative to financial ability and signed under the penalty of perjury. The financial information required by the Registrar shall be confidential and not a public record, but where relevant, shall be admissible as evidence in any administrative hearing or judicial action or proceeding. The Registrar may destroy any financial information which has been on file for a period of at least three years. The financial information obtained by the Registrar is unverifiable by the CSLB. If needed, this bill will delete this code section and increase the surety bond by $2,500, thereby, increasing the bond from $12,500 to $15,000. Surety bonds. BPC Section 7071.6 requires that applicants or licensees have on file, at all times, proof of a $12,500 surety contractor bond. This requirement is precedent to the issuance, reinstatement, reaction, renewal, or continued maintenance of a SB 467 Page 7 license. Surety bonds are a pledge made by an individual or company that guarantees another individuals' or company's performance according to a contract'terms. With the deletion of BPC Section 7067.5 the surety bond will be increased from $12,000 to $15,000 to provide greater consumer protection. Analysis Prepared by: Eunie Linden / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301 FN: 0001751