BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 62 Page 1 (Without Reference to File) SENATE THIRD READING SB 62 (Hill and Pavley) As Amended August 30, 2016 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: vote not relevant ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Higher | | | | |Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |(vote not | | | | |relevant) | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SB 62 Page 2 |(vote not | | | | |relevant) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Utilities |14-0 |Gatto, Patterson, | | | | |Burke, Chávez, Dahle, | | | | |Eggman, Cristina | | | | |Garcia, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Hadley, Holden, | | | | |Obernolte, Quirk, | | | | |Santiago, Ting | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Codifies a Division of Safety Advocates within the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) created in the 2016-17 State Budget and makes various changes. Specifically, this bill: 1)Codifies a Division of Safety Advocates within the CPUC; 2)Renames the Division the Office of Safety Advocates; 3)Clarifies that advocacy prioritizes safety and takes costs into consideration; 4)Clarifies that the CPUC is responsible for CPUC safety management, rather than delegated to the Safety Advocate; and 5)Adds safety transparency to the newly created Office's SB 62 Page 3 mission. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. COMMENTS: 1)Author's Statement: According to the author, "SB 62 fixes problems with the PUC's proposal for an in-house advocate for safety. As the funding for the proposal was approved in this year's Budget, the Legislature must provide statutory policy direction to a) ensure that the Commission cannot shift responsibility for safety onto this advocate, as responsibility lies ultimately with the Commission, b) advocate for the transparency of safety-related performance, and c) sunset the advocate, so that it can't limp on in perpetuity without action by the Legislature." 2)Background: For the 2016-17 Fiscal Year, the CPUC requested and the State Budget authorized 11 permanent positions and $1.694 million in funding to create a Division of Safety Advocates, an independent division within the CPUC. The CPUC requested establishing a Division of Safety Advocates in response to, according to the CPUC, "unprecedented failures of utility infrastructure over the past five years that threaten the safety of Californians." According to the CPUC, "Creation of a Division of Safety Advocates would allow the CPUC to have a division dedicated to establishing a safety focus, testifying in hearings, and exclusively prioritizing and advocating for the protection and safety of Californians as a party to CPUC proceedings." 3)Codifying the Safety Division: According to the author, this bill will codify this newly created Division, consistent with the CPUC's approved funding request, with the following changes: SB 62 Page 4 a) Renames the Division the Office of Safety Advocates; b) Clarifies that advocacy prioritizes safety and takes costs into consideration; c) Clarifies that the CPUC is responsible for CPUC safety management, rather than delegated to the Safety Advocate; and d) Adds safety transparency to the newly created Office's mission. Prepared by: Sue Kateley / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083 FN: 0004999