SB 38,
as amended, Liu. Personal income tax: credit: earnedbegin delete income.end deletebegin insert income: tax preparer education.end insert
The
end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTheend insert Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including certain credits that are allowed in modified conformity to credits allowed by federal income tax laws.
Thisbegin delete bill would,end deletebegin insert bill,end insert for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016,
and before January 1, 2027,begin insert
wouldend insert allow a credit based upon earned income that is equal tobegin delete 15%end deletebegin insert
30% for eligible individuals with qualifying children and 100% for eligible individuals with no qualifying children, as specified,end insert of the earned income tax credit allowed by federal law.begin insert If the amount allowable as a credit exceeds tax liability, the bill would require the excess to be credited against other amounts due, if any, and the balance, if any, to be carried forward, or, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be paid from the General Fund and refunded to the eligible individual.end insert The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to report to the Legislature regarding the utilization of the tax credit, as provided.
This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
end deleteThis bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to establish a pilot program to allow eligible individuals to secure advance payments of the aforementioned credit. The bill would make the pilot program applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and before January 1, 2019, where an employer and an eligible individual have agreed to participate in the pilot program. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to study and report on the pilot program by a specified date.
end insertbegin insert(2) Existing law establishes the California Tax Education Council, a nonprofit organization, and requires the council to register and regulate tax preparers. Existing law requires the council to issue a “certificate of completion” to the tax preparer when the tax preparer demonstrates that he or she has completed basic tax instruction from an approved curriculum provider. Existing law also requires a tax preparer to annually complete continuing education from an approved curriculum provider. Except as provided, a violation of the provisions governing tax preparers is a crime.
end insertbegin insertThis bill, for purposes of basic instruction and continuing education, would require an approved curriculum provider to include instruction for filing taxes for a taxpayer who is an eligible individual and meets the requirements for the state earned income tax credit, as described above. Because a violation of these requirements would constitute a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) In its Supplemental Poverty Measure report for the year
42013, released in October 2014, the United States Census Bureau
5reported California’s rate of poverty to be 23.4 percent. This rate
6is the highest among all 50 states.
P3 1(b) Using census data released in September 2014, the
2California Budget Project (CBP) reported that the economic
3recovery from the Great Recession has largely bypassed low- and
4middle-income
Californians, with the bottom three-fifths of the
5income distribution experiencing stagnating income gains. This
6is contrasted with the top one-fifth of the income distribution
7experiencing gains of 52.4 percent.
8(c) A briefing on poverty released by the CBP in August 2014
9reports that 67 percent of families living in poverty were supported
10by one or more workers in 2012. Given that the majority of families
11living in poverty are working families in California, it is evident
12that poverty largely reflects low-paying jobs, not the absence of
13employment.
14(d) In California, the Public Policy Institute of California
15(PPIC), in collaboration with the Stanford Center on Poverty and
16Inequality, has developed the California Poverty Measure (CPM),
17which underscores the role of California’s social safety net amount,
18which includes the CalFresh Program, CalWORKs, and the federal
19Earned Income
Tax Credit (EITC), in mitigating poverty.
20(e) Using data from 2011, a PPIC report on the CPM released
21in October 2013, reveals that 22 percent of Californians, 8.1
22million people, lived in poverty. A comparison of CPM rates by
23county show that the three most populous counties, Los Angeles
24County, San Diego County, and Orange County, all had rates
25above the statewide CPM at 26.9 percent, 22.7 percent, and 24.3
26percent, respectively.
27(f) The CPM rate for children statewide, those under 18 years
28of age, was 25.1 percent, the highest rate of any age group. This
29amounts to 2.3 million of California’s children living in poverty.
30(g) Without need-based safety net programs and resources, over
3130 percent of Californians would be living in poverty. The absence
32of the safety net would increase the poverty rate among
33
California’s children to 39 percent according to the CPM.
34(h) Refundable tax credits, including the federal EITC, reduced
35the poverty rate in California by 3.2 percent overall. Among
36children, the poverty rate reduction was 6 percent. This means
37that 560,000 fewer children and 600,000 fewer working-age adults,
381.16 million people fewer in total, are living in poverty when
39refundable tax credits are accounted for in the CPM.
P4 1(i) According to the National Conference of State Legislatures,
225 states in the country and the District of Columbia, provide an
3EITC in addition to the federal EITC. California does not currently
4have a state EITC.
5(j) A Brookings Institution report issued in January 2003, shows
6that in addition to boosting the family incomes of families in
7poverty, state EITC refunds served as an important
economic
8stimulus for the communities and regions of the families by
9magnifying the impact of the federal EITC overall.
begin insertSection 22255.5 is added to the end insertbegin insertBusiness and
11Professions Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
For purposes of basic instruction and continuing
13education as described in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 22255,
14an approved curriculum provider shall include instruction for
15preparing taxes for a taxpayer who is an eligible individual and
16meets the requirements for the state earned income tax credit
17described in Section 17052.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
Section 17052.1 is added to the Revenue and Taxation
20Code, to read:
(a) For each taxable year beginning on or after
22January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2027, there shall be allowed
23a credit against the “net tax,” as definedbegin delete byend deletebegin insert inend insert Section 17039,begin insert inend insert
24 an amount computed by multiplying the “federal earned income
25credit amount,” as defined in subdivision (b), bybegin delete 15 percent.end deletebegin insert 30
26percent for
eligible individuals with qualifying children and 100
27percent for eligible individuals with no qualifying children.end insert
28(b) Forbegin insert theend insert purposes of this section, “federal earned income
29credit amount” means the amount determined under Section 32 of
30the Internal Revenue Code,begin insert relating to earned incomeend insert as amended
31by Section 1002(a) of Public Law 111-5, as amended by Section
32219(a)(2) of Public Law 111-226, as amended by Section 103(c)
33of Public Law 111-312, and as amended by Section 103(c) of
34Public Law 112-240.
35(c) For the
purposes of this section, an “eligible individual”
36shall have the same meaning as in Section 32(c)(1) of the Internal
37Revenue Code, except that Section 32(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II) of the Internal
38Revenue Code is modified to substitute “age 21” for “age 25.”
39(d) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the case where
40the credit allowed under this section exceeds “net tax,” the excess
P5 1credit may be carried over to reduce the “net tax” in the following
2taxable year, and succeeding taxable years, if necessary, until the
3credit is exhausted.
4(2) If the amount allowable as a credit under this section exceeds
5the tax liability computed under this part for the taxable year, the
6excess shall be credited against other amounts due, if any, and the
7balance, if any,
shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be
8paid from the General Fund and refunded to the qualified taxpayer.
9(e) Any amounts refunded to a taxpayer pursuant to this section
10shall not be included in income subject to tax under this part.
11(f) For an individual who is a nonresident or is a part-year
12resident of this state, the amount of the credit or refund allowed
13under this section shall be determined based on the part of the
14earned income credit allowable for the taxable year that is
15attributable to California, determined by multiplying the federal
16earned income credit by a fraction as follows:
17(1) The numerator of which is the California adjusted gross
18income of the individual.
19(2) The denominator of which is the federal adjusted gross
20income of the individual.
21(g) Notwithstanding any other provision, for the purpose of
22determining eligibility to receive benefits under Division 9
23(commencing with Section 10000) of the Welfare and Institutions
24Code or the amounts of those benefits, any refund made to an
25individual (or the spouse or registered domestic partner of an
26individual) pursuant to this section, and any payment made to the
27individual (or the spouse or registered domestic partner) by an
28employer pursuant to Section 17052.2, shall not be treated as
29income and shall not be taken into account in determining
30resources for the month of its receipt and the following month.
31(c)
end delete
32begin insert(h)end insert (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government
33Code, on or before January 1, 2026, the Franchise Tax Board shall
34submit a report on the utilization of the credit described in
35subdivision (a) to the Legislature. The report shall include
36information regarding the effectiveness of the credit, including the
37amount of the credit claimed, the number of claims made, and an
38estimate of the amount overclaimed and underclaimed.
P6 1(2) The report submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be
2submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
3Code.
4(i) Section 41 does not apply to the credit allowed by this
5section.
6(j) This section is repealed on December 1, 2027.
end insertThis act provides for a tax levy within the meaning of
8Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.
begin insertSection 17052.2 is added to the end insertbegin insertRevenue and Taxation
10Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) The Franchise Tax Board shall establish a pilot
12program to allow eligible individuals to secure advance payments
13of a credit amount for which they are qualified pursuant to Section
1417052.1. The purpose of the pilot program is to study the feasibility
15and effectiveness of preventing debt and financial hardship among
16low-income working individuals and families.
17(b) The pilot program shall apply to any credits for which a
18taxpayer is an eligible individual in accordance with Section
1917052.1 on or after taxable years January 1, 2017, and before
20January 1, 2019, where an employer and an eligible individual
21have agreed to participate in the pilot program.
22(c) (1) Not later than January 1, 2020, the Franchise Tax Board
23shall study the pilot program and report the findings of the pilot
24program to the Legislature.
25(2) The report submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be
26submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
27Code.
28(d) This section is repealed on December 1, 2020.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
30Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
31the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
32district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
33infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
34for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
35the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
36the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
37Constitution.
O
98