BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator Bob Wieckowski, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: SB 20 Hearing Date: 4/15/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Pavley | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |12/1/2014 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Rachel Machi Wagoner | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Wells: reports: public availability ANALYSIS: Existing law: Requires a person who digs, bores, or drills a water well, cathodic protection well, or a monitoring well, or abandons or destroys a well, or deepens or reperforates a well, to file a report of completion with the Department of Water Resources (DWR). Existing law prohibits those reports from being made available to the public, except under certain circumstances. This bill: Makes well completion reports available to the public and in doing so: 1. Requires persons requesting a report to do so on a form identifying the name and address of the requestor, and the reason for the request. 2. Requires the release of the well logs to comply with the privacy and other provisions of the Information Practices Act. 3. Requires a disclosure statement regarding the appropriate use of the data. 4. Authorizes DWR to charge a fee for providing the well completion reports. Background In 1949, to help prevent groundwater pollution caused by improperly constructed water wells, the California Legislature SB 20 (Pavley) Page 2 of ? first required well drillers to file a well completion report with the state for each well drilled. Two years later, in 1951, the Legislature enacted AB 1512 (Dickey) which restricted access to well completion reports "to governmental agencies for use in making studies." According to a May 21, 1951, letter from the Director of Public Works to Governor Warren, it was because the information in the reports "is regarded by some well drillers as part of their stock in trade." That is, for competitive reasons. While the statute has been amended a number of times in the intervening 60 plus years, the restriction to access has largely stayed the same. Comments 1. Purpose of Bill. According to the author, "every time a water well is drilled, the driller is required by law to provide the Department of Water Resources (DWR) a report describing how the well was constructed and the type of soils the driller encountered in drilling the well. These reports contain critical information for groundwater managers, consulting hydrologists, academics, and others interested in the geologic and hydrologic characteristics of groundwater basins. Unfortunately, those who would benefit from this information cannot have access to it. For over 60 years, the law has restricted access to those reports to just government agencies." 2. What is a well completion report? Also known as drillers' logs or well logs, well completion reports are a record of the drilling and construction of the well. They include, among other things, the location of the well, the depth of the well, the type of soils encountered at each elevation as drilling, depth to water, etc. 3. Why are they required? It is important that wells be properly constructed, modified, or decommissioned. Well completion reports provide the SB 20 (Pavley) Page 3 of ? record necessary to demonstrate that the well was properly constructed, modified, or decommissioned, and further provides the necessary construction detail should the well need to be modified at some later date. 4. What other uses do they have? Data in the reports can be used to construct detailed underground aquifer maps. These maps are critical to developing and implementing groundwater management plans. For example, such data can be used to find the best possible locations groundwater banking, identify key recharge areas, and to better avoid impaired groundwater quality. SB 20 (Pavley) Page 4 of ? 5. What Do Other States Do? No other western state restricts access to well logs as in California. Indeed, 10 of 11 western states provide internet access to well logs. 6. How Does California Deal With Similar Issues? Every time an oil or gas well is drilled, the driller must provide a copy of the well log to the Department of Conservation. Those logs are deemed public records for purposes of the California Public Records Act. (There are exceptions, logs for exploratory wells, for example, are considered confidential for a specific period of time.) The Department of Conservation provides public access to those logs through a GIS map on the internet. 7. What Do Other Water Agencies Do? A review of urban water management plans and capital improvement plans shows that over 160 water agencies have published the location of their wells, usually on maps, but sometimes the actual addresses. This represents locations of over 2,200 water system wells, of which the author's staff has located 96 percent through online maps. Adjudicated groundwater basins have court-appointed watermasters, a number of whom have published maps showing the location of production wells within their jurisdiction. For example, the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster published a fairly detailed 2008 map showing the location of 99 active production wells. The drilling of a new water system well is usually a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA, among other things, requires the disclosure of the location of the project. A review of CEQA Clearinghouse's online database shows the location of over 70 wells. 8. What Would The Fee Cover? It is not clear how large the fee for a copy of a well log SB 20 (Pavley) Page 5 of ? would be. However, the fee would likely include a share of the following: A. Costs to create and maintain a copy of the log that redacts personal information pursuant to the Information Practices Act of 1977. B. Costs of duplicating the redacted well log. C. Cost to develop and disseminate the disclosure statement regarding the appropriate use of the data. D. Costs to develop and maintain the form identifying the name and address of the requestor, and the reason for the request. E. Any additional administrative costs associated with implementing this bill. Related/Prior Legislation SB 263 (Pavley, 2011) required well completion reports be made available to the public. To address the opposition's concerns, the bill was amended on the Assembly floor to restrict access to persons with specific qualifications and added penalty provisions for disclosing information in the well log. Governor Brown vetoed that bill because of those provisions, and directed DWR to work with the author "to ensure responsible public access to well logs." SB 1146 (Pavley, 2012) required well completion reports be made available to the public. Specific language to address the opposition's concerns was the result of negotiations with DWR, the Department of Health Services, and CalEMA, "to ensure responsible public access to well logs." That bill failed on the Senate Floor (19-16). SOURCE: Senator Pavley SUPPORT: California League of Conservation Voters California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation California Water Impact Network Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment Clean Water Action Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation Community Water Center Defenders of Wildlife East Bay Municipal Utility District SB 20 (Pavley) Page 6 of ? Environmental Action Committee of West Marin Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Environmental Water Caucus Food & Water Watch Friends of the River Karuk Tribe Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability National Parks Conservation Association Natural Resources Defense Council North County Watch Planning and Conservation League PolicyLink Public Trust Water Sierra Club California Southern California Watershed Alliance The Nature Conservancy Wholly H2O OPPOSITION: California Chamber of Commerce California Citrus Mutual California Cotton Ginners Association California Cotton Growers Association California Dairies, Inc. California Farm Bureau Federation California Fresh Fruit Association California League of Food Processors Desert Water Agency Family Winemakers of California Kings River Conservation District Kings River Water Association Nisei Farmers League Valley Ag Water Coalition Western Agricultural Processors Association Western Growers Association Western Plant Health Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, "Every time a water well is drilled, the driller is required by law to provide DWR a well completion report, also known as a well log." "These reports contain critical information for groundwater SB 20 (Pavley) Page 7 of ? managers, consulting hydrologists, academics, and others interested in the geologic and hydrologic characteristics of groundwater basins. Unfortunately, those who would benefit from this information cannot have access to it. Farmers can't know how deep they need to drill their wells. Academics cannot develop sophisticated maps and models without the sponsorship of the government. Local community activists cannot gain the information they need to better protect drinking water quality of disadvantaged communities. The list goes on." "The Governor directed DWR to work with me 'to ensure responsible public access to well logs.' This bill is the result of those negotiations with DWR, along with the Department of Health Services (DHS) and CalEMA, which is California's official homeland security agency. This bill addresses and resolves the various security concerns raised by DHS and CalEMA." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition of agricultural interests asserts "Well logs are already required to be submitted to the Department of Water resources and are available to the appropriate public agencies. For example, groundwater management agencies already have access and utilize this information to better manage their groundwater locally. We understand the importance of managing our scarce groundwater resources and are fully supportive of local efforts to do just that. We believe the well log data is available to those entities that have a genuine need to evaluate and utilize it for the benefit of managing our groundwater supplies. No beneficial purpose could be gained by making this confidential data available to the public. We believe this measure will only assist those trolling for lawsuits." -- END --