Amended in Assembly May 3, 2016

Amended in Assembly April 27, 2016

Amended in Assembly April 6, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 18, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1764


Introduced by Assembly Member Waldron

February 3, 2016


An act to amend Section 127660 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to health care coverage.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1764, as amended, Waldron. California Health Benefit Review Program: financial impacts.

Existing law, until July 1, 2017, requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess, among other things, legislation that proposes to mandate or repeal a mandated benefit or service, as defined. Existing law requests the University of California to prepare a written analysis with relevant data on public health, medical, financial, and other impacts of that legislation, as specified.

Existing law requests the University of California to provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature, as specified, and to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the implementation of these provisions by January 1, 2017. Existing law establishes the Health Care Benefits Fund in the State Treasury to effectively support the University of California and its work in implementing these provisions.begin delete The California Health Benefit Review Program has been reauthorized since its predecessor was established in 2002.end delete

This bill would additionally request the University ofbegin delete California, commencing July 1, 2017,end deletebegin insert Californiaend insert to include in its analysis, as part of the financial impacts of the above legislation, relevant data on the impact of coverage or repeal of coverage of the benefit or service on anticipated costs or savings estimated upon implementation for the 2 subsequent state fiscal years and, if applicable, for the 5 subsequent state fiscal years, as specified.

begin insert

This bill would make its provisions operative on July 1, 2017, and only if the California Health Benefit Review Program is reauthorized, as specified.

end insert

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 127660 of the Health and Safety Code
2 is amended to read:

3

127660.  

(a) The Legislature hereby requests the University of
4California to establish the California Health Benefit Review
5Program to assess legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or
6service, as defined in subdivision (d), and legislation proposing to
7repeal a mandated benefit or service, as defined in subdivision (e),
8and to prepare a written analysis with relevant data on the
9following:

10(1) Public health impacts, including, but not limited to, all of
11the following:

12(A) The impact on the health of the community, including the
13reduction of communicable disease and the benefits of prevention
14such as those provided by childhood immunizations and prenatal
15care.

16(B) The impact on the health of the community, including
17diseases and conditions where disparities in outcomes associated
18with the social determinants of health as well as gender, race,
19sexual orientation, or gender identity are established in
20peer-reviewed scientific and medical literature.

21(C) The extent to which the benefit or service reduces premature
22death and the economic loss associated with disease.

P3    1(2) Medical impacts, including, but not limited to, all of the
2following:

3(A) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally
4recognized by the medical community as being effective in the
5screening, diagnosis, or treatment of a condition or disease, as
6demonstrated by a review of scientific and peer-reviewed medical
7literature.

8(B) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally
9available and utilized by treating physicians.

10(C) The contribution of the benefit or service to the health status
11of the population, including the results of any research
12demonstrating the efficacy of the benefit or service compared to
13alternatives, including not providing the benefit or service.

14(D) The extent to which mandating or repealing the benefits or
15services would not diminish or eliminate access to currently
16available health care benefits or services.

17(3) Financial impacts, including, but not limited to, all of the
18following:

19(A) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
20increase or decrease the benefit or cost of the benefit or service.

21(B) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
22increase the utilization of the benefit or service, or will be a
23substitute for, or affect the cost of, alternative benefits or services.

24(C) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
25increase or decrease the administrative expenses of health care
26service plans and health insurers and the premium and expenses
27of subscribers, enrollees, and policyholders.

28(D) The impact of this coverage or repeal of coverage on the
29total cost of health care.

30(E) begin deleteCommencing July 1, 2017, the end deletebegin insertThe end insertimpact of this coverage
31or repeal of coverage on anticipated costs or savings estimated
32upon implementation for the following periods:

33(i) The two subsequent state fiscal years.

34(ii) If applicable, the five subsequent state fiscal years through
35a longer-range estimate.

36(F) The potential cost or savings to the private sector, including
37the impact on small employers as defined in paragraph (1) of
38 subdivision (l) of Section 1357, the Public Employees’ Retirement
39System, other retirement systems funded by the state or by a local
40government, individuals purchasing individual health insurance,
P4    1and publicly funded state health insurance programs, including
2the Medi-Cal program and the Healthy Families Program.

3(G) The extent to which costs resulting from lack of coverage
4or repeal of coverage are or would be shifted to other payers,
5including both public and private entities.

6(H) The extent to which mandating or repealing the proposed
7benefit or service would not diminish or eliminate access to
8currently available health care benefits or services.

9(I) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally utilized
10by a significant portion of the population.

11(J) The extent to which health care coverage for the benefit or
12service is already generally available.

13(K) The level of public demand for health care coverage for the
14benefit or service, including the level of interest of collective
15bargaining agents in negotiating privately for inclusion of this
16coverage in group contracts, and the extent to which the mandated
17benefit or service is covered by self-funded employer groups.

18(L) In assessing and preparing a written analysis of the financial
19impact of legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or service and
20legislation proposing to repeal a mandated benefit or service
21pursuant to this paragraph, the Legislature requests the University
22of California to use a certified actuary or other person with relevant
23knowledge and expertise to determine the financial impact.

24(4) The impact on essential health benefits, as defined in Section
251367.005 of this code and Section 10112.27 of the Insurance Code,
26and the impact on the California Health Benefit Exchange.

27(b) The Legislature further requests that the California Health
28Benefit Review Program assess legislation that impacts health
29insurance benefit design, cost sharing, premiums, and other health
30insurance topics.

31(c) The Legislature requests that the University of California
32provide every analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal
33committees of the Legislature not later than 60 days, or in a manner
34and pursuant to a timeline agreed to by the Legislature and the
35California Health Benefit Review Program, after receiving a request
36made pursuant to Section 127661. In addition, the Legislature
37requests that the university post every analysis on the Internet and
38make every analysis available to the public upon request.

39(d) As used in this section, “legislation proposing to mandate a
40benefit or service” means a proposed statute that requires a health
P5    1care service plan or a health insurer, or both, to do any of the
2following:

3(1) Permit a person insured or covered under the policy or
4contract to obtain health care treatment or services from a particular
5type of health care provider.

6(2) Offer or provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, or
7treatment of a particular disease or condition.

8(3) Offer or provide coverage of a particular type of health care
9treatment or service, or of medical equipment, medical supplies,
10or drugs used in connection with a health care treatment or service.

11(e) As used in this section, “legislation proposing to repeal a
12mandated benefit or service” means a proposed statute that, if
13enacted, would become operative on or after January 1, 2008, and
14would repeal an existing requirement that a health care service
15plan or a health insurer, or both, do any of the following:

16(1) Permit a person insured or covered under the policy or
17contract to obtain health care treatment or services from a particular
18type of health care provider.

19(2) Offer or provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, or
20treatment of a particular disease or condition.

21(3) Offer or provide coverage of a particular type of health care
22treatment or service, or of medical equipment, medical supplies,
23or drugs used in connection with a health care treatment or service.

24begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

This act shall become operative on July 1, 2017, and
25shall become operative only if the dates on which Chapter 7
26(commencing with Section 127660) of Part 2 of Division 107 of
27the Health and Safety Code becomes inoperative and is repealed
28are deleted or extended.

end insert


O

    95