BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |AB 1303 |Hearing |7/15/15 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Gray |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |6/24/15 |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Weinberger | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBDIVISION APPROVALS (URGENCY) Provides an automatic 24-month extension for unexpired subdivision maps approved after January 1, 2000 in jurisdictions that meet specified criteria. Background and Existing Law Under the Subdivision Map Act, cities and counties approve tentative maps that must be consistent with their general plans, attaching scores of conditions. Once subdividers comply with those conditions, local officials must issue final maps. For smaller subdivisions (lot splits) local officials usually use parcel maps, but they can require tentative parcel maps followed by final parcel maps. In good economic times, an experienced subdivider can comply with a tentative map's conditions in a few years. Scarce financing, complex settings, and inexperience can drag out the time between a tentative map's approval and the filing of a final map. If a tentative map expires, the subdivider must start over, complying with any new required conditions. The Permit Streamlining Act sets forth time limits and procedures for some types of land use decisions, including tentative maps. It also prohibits a local agency, after it approves or conditionally approves a tentative map for a AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 2 of ? residential unit, from requiring conformance with any condition the local agency could have imposed, as a condition to the issuance of any building permit for five-years, after the recordation of that subdivision's final map or parcel map. A city or county also can't refuse to issue a building permit for failing to conform with or perform any conditions that the city, or county could have imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map. Tentative maps can be valid for up to 16 years: The initial life of a tentative map is two years. At the option of the city or county, a map's initial life can be three years. Local officials can grant extensions for up to six years. If the subdivider spends substantial funds and files phased final maps, the remaining tentative map is automatically extended by three years, up to a maximum of ten years. These deadlines don't apply during development moratoria (up to five years) or during pending litigation (up to five years). During periods of economic recession, both in the mid-1990s and in the last seven years, the Legislature has extended the life of unexpired subdivision approvals, without local review or approval. Unexpired subdivision maps that were valid on: September 13, 1993, gained two more years (SB 428, Thompson, 1993). May 14, 1996, gained one more year (AB 771, Aguiar, 1996). July 15, 2008, gained one more year (SB 1185, Lowenthal, 2008). July 15, 2009, gained two more years (AB 333, Fuentes, 2009). AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 3 of ? July 15, 2011, gained two more years (AB 208, Fuentes, 2011). When the Legislature granted the one-year extension in 2008, it also let local officials grant an additional year, at their discretion (SB 1185, Lowenthal, 2008). In 2013, the Legislature granted unexpired subdivision maps another two year extension (AB 116, Bocanegra, 2013). Under the provisions of the Bocanegra bill, current law automatically extends, by 24 months, the life of a tentative map that was approved after January 1, 2000 and which was pending on July 11, 2013. For tentative maps initially approved before January 1, 2000, a subdivider must file an application at least 90 days prior to the map expiration. If the local agency determines that the map is consistent with the planning and zoning standards in effect at the time of the extension application, the local agency must grant an extension of 24 months. If the tentative map is not consistent with the new standards, then the agency may deny or conditionally approve the extension for up to twenty four months. For a tentative map or parcel map that is extended pursuant to state law, a city or county may levy a fee or impose a condition that requires the payment of a fee. Because the housing construction market remains poor in some California counties, despite the general economic recovery, some county officials want legislators to extend the life of unexpired tentative maps in counties that have not recovered from the recent recession. Proposed Law Within counties that meet specified criteria, Assembly Bill 1303 extends, by 24 months, the expiration date for any tentative map, vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or tentative vesting map was approved on or after January 1, 2000 and which has not expired when this urgency bill takes effect. AB 1303's provisions only apply to maps approved within counties that meet the following criteria: AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 4 of ? The annual mean household income within the county is less than 80% of the statewide annual mean income, as determined by a specified U.S. Census Bureau report. The county's annual nonseasonal unemployment rate is at least 3% higher than the statewide annual nonseasonal unemployment rate, as defined by a specified Employment Development Department report. The poverty rate within the county's population is at least 4% higher than the statewide median poverty rate, as determined by a specified U.S. Census Bureau report. For maps approved before January 1, 2000, AB 1303 allows a subdivider to file an application for an extension at least 90 days before the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, vesting tentative map, or parcel map. AB 1303 requires a legislative body to extend the time at which the map expires for a period of 24 months, upon a determination that the map is consistent with the applicable zoning and general plan requirement in effect when the application is filed. If the map is determined to be inconsistent with applicable zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the application is filed, AB 1303 authorizes the legislative body or advisory agency to deny or conditionally approve an extension for a period of 24 months. Prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon a subdivider's application to extend that map, AB 1303 automatically extends the map for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs last. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider's application for an extension, the bill authorizes a subdivider to appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency denied the extension. An extension provided pursuant to AB 1303 is in addition to extensions authorized by eight specified statutes. For any legislative, administrative, or other approval by a state agency relating to a development project in a subdivision affected by AB 1303 that has not expired when the bill takes effect, AB 1303 extends the expiration date by 24 months. This AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 5 of ? extension is in addition to five other statutory extensions. AB 1303 reduces, from five years to three years, the period of time after the approval or conditional approval of a tentative map, or recordation of a parcel map, during which a city or county is prohibited, with exceptions, from imposing specified conditions on a building permit or equivalent permit. The bill also provides that the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit. State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . In some California counties, economic conditions have not yet recovered from the recent recession, which has depressed the demand for new housing. Until the demand for new housing resumes, subdividers aren't likely to complete the required conditions of their tentative maps and qualify for final maps. With statutory time limits looming, some builders risk losing their earlier approvals and having to start over again. Similar to the Legislature's earlier responses during other market slumps, AB 1303 preserves subdividers' ability to finalize their maps for two more years in ten counties that qualify under the bill's criteria for demonstrating economic hardship (Fresno, Imperial, Kings, Madera, Merced, Modoc, Siskiyou, Stanislaus, Tulare, and Yuba). Allowing developers additional time to use maps in which they have invested significant time and expense will help to promote economic activity and jobs in communities that are still struggling to achieve an economic recovery. 2. Timing is everything . Unlike past extension bills, the Bocanegrea bill enacted in 2013 gave city councils and county supervisors' discretion over whether to extend the life of maps, that were approved before January 1, 2000 and which no longer meet current land use standards. AB 1303 grants maps 2 additional years in which to become final, but doesn't change AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 6 of ? the cutoff date for maps that no longer conform to general plan or zoning requirements. To remain consistent with the approach the Legislature adopted two years ago, the Committee may wish to consider amending AB 1303 to allow local officials to exercise discretion over maps, that were approved before January 1, 2002 and which no longer comply with current standards. 3. Timing is everything, part 2 . The first in the most recent series of bills that have automatically extended deadlines for tentative subdivision maps passed in 2008, at which time the entire state was experiencing severe economic recession and turmoil in the real estate market. Developers holding tentative subdivision maps that were about to expire in 2008, clearly needed more time to complete their projects. Even when the most recent extensions bill passed in 2013, some developers could still plausibly argue that they had recently sought approval of tentative maps in the hopes that the economic repercussions in the real estate market would resolve sooner than they actually did. It is less clear why the Legislature should, in 2015, provide automatic extensions for maps that were approved just last year, or even in late 2013. If the Legislature continues to grant automatic extensions even for maps approved well after the worst of the economic downturn has passed, then legislators will need to consider permanently changing the timelines that apply to tentative maps. Instead, the Committee may wish to consider amending AB 1303 to exclude from its automatic extension any maps that were approved after July 11, 2013, which is the date on which the preceding extension legislation took effect. 4. Urgency . Regular statutes take effect on January 1 following their enactment; bills passed in 2015 take effect on January 1, 2016. The California Constitution allows bills with urgency clauses to take effect immediately if they're needed for the public peace, health, and safety. AB 1303 contains an urgency clause declaring that it is necessary for its provisions to go into effect immediately to allow local governments to preserve development applications that are set to expire and that cannot be processed presently due to prevailing adverse economic conditions in the construction industry. AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 7 of ? 5. Mandate . The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local governments for the costs of new or expanded state mandated local programs. Because SB 1303 requires local officials to follow additional procedures related to extending some tentative maps, Legislative Counsel says that the bill imposes a new state mandate. SB 1303 disclaims the state's responsibility for providing reimbursement by citing local governments' authority to charge for the costs of implementing the bill's provisions. 6. New bill, prior votes not relevant . As passed by the Assembly, AB 1303 contained provisions amending the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act's restrictions on market research involving licensees. The Senate Governance & Finance Committee never heard that version of the bill. The June 24 amendments deleted AB 1303's contents and inserted the current language relating to subdivision maps. Assembly Actions Not relevant to the June 24, 2015 version of the bill. Support and Opposition (7/9/15) Support : California Association of Realtors; California Chamber of Commerce; Home Builders Association of Kern County. AB 1303 (Gray) 6/24/15 Page 8 of ? Opposition : Unknown. -- END --