BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1156


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 13, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          1156 (Brown) - As Introduced February 27, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Public Safety                  |Vote:|6 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill makes various provisions of law, relating to persons  
          convicted of a felony and sentenced to the state prison,  
          applicable to persons convicted of a felony and sentenced to a  








                                                                    AB 1156


                                                                    Page  2





          county jail under the 2011 Realignment Act.  Specifically, this  
          bill:  


          1)Clarifies that in any case where the pre-imprisonment credit  
            of a person sentenced to the county jail under the 2011  
            Realignment Act exceeds any sentence imposed, the entire  
            sentence shall be deemed to have been served, except for the  
            remaining portion of mandatory supervision, and the defendant  
            shall not be delivered to the custody of the county  
            correctional administrator.

          2)Provides that when a defendant is sentenced to the county jail  
            under the 2011 Realignment Act, the court may, within 120 days  
            of the date of commitment on its own motion, or upon the  
            recommendation of the county correctional administrator,  
            recall the sentence previously ordered and resentence the  
            defendant in the same manner as if he or she had not  
            previously been sentenced, provided the new sentence, if any,  
            is no greater than the original sentence.

          3)Requires the Judicial Council to adopt rules providing  
            criteria for the imposition of the lower,  or upper term, and  
            determine the county or jurisdictional territory when the  
            court is imposing a concurrent or consecutive sentence under  
            the 2011 Realignment Act upon a person previously sentenced to  
            the county jail under the 2011 Realignment Act in another  
            county or jurisdictional territory.

          4)Extends provisions related to the compassionate release of a  
            state prison inmate, who is terminally ill, to an inmate  
            sentenced to a county jail under the 2011 Realignment Act. 

          5)Clarifies that a person released from the state prison on post  
            release community supervision shall be supervised by the  
            probation department of the county to which the person is  
            released, and requires that the inmate be informed of his or  
            her duty to report to the county probation department upon  
            release.








                                                                    AB 1156


                                                                    Page  3






          6)Extends the right to petition for a certificate of  
            rehabilitation and pardon to persons convicted of a felony and  
            sentenced to a county jail under the 2011 Realignment Act.   
            Makes additional non-substantive changes, conforming changes,  
            and deletes obsolete provisions.

          7)Provides that a person shall not be subject to prosecution for  
            a non-felony offense arising out of a violation in the  
            California Vehicle Code, with the exception of Driving under  
            the Influence (DUI), that is pending against him or her at the  
            time of his or commitment to a county jail under the 2011  
            Realignment Act.



          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Moderate nonreimbursable costs to the counties for the various  
            permissive activities authorized. The magnitude of the costs  
            will depend on the counties that choose to participate in the  
            permissive activities.  Some savings will be realized if terms  
            of confinement in county jails are reduced.


          2)Minor absorbable costs to the Judicial Council to adopt a Rule  
            of Court.


          COMMENTS:


          Purpose and Background.  According to the author, "AB 1156  
          eliminates discrepancies and inconsistencies in treatment  
          between felons sent to prison and felons sent to county jail  
          under Realignment that were not addressed in the original or  
          subsequent legislation.  These inconsistencies are unnecessary,  
          unfair, and costly.  Their elimination will enhance the fairness  








                                                                    AB 1156


                                                                    Page  4





          of the system and save the taxpayers money. " 








          Analysis Prepared by:Pedro R. Reyes / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081