BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1084| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1084 Author: Bonilla (D) Amended: 8/19/16 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 6-2, 6/29/16 AYES: Block, Hancock, Leyva, Mendoza, Monning, Pan NOES: Huff, Vidak NO VOTE RECORDED: Liu ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 1/27/16 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Charter schools: for-profit entities SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill provides that effective July 1, 2017, charter schools shall only operate as, or be operated by, a school district, county board of education, or University of California. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/19/16 remove the provisions regarding the operation of virtual or online charter schools and add a provision providing that charter schools shall only operate as, or be operated by, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, school district, county board of education, or University of California. ANALYSIS: Existing law: AB 1084 Page 2 1)Establishes the Charter Schools Act of 1992 which provides for the establishment of charter schools in California for the purpose, among other things, to improve student learning and expand learning experiences for pupils who are identified as academically low achieving. A charter school may be authorized by a school district, a county board of education, or the State Board of Education, as specified. Except where specifically noted otherwise, California law exempts charter schools from many of the statutes and regulations that apply to schools and school districts. 2)Authorizes a charter school to elect to operate as, or be operated by, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, formed and organized pursuant to the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. 3)Specifies that the governing board of a school district that grants a charter for the establishment of a charter school shall be entitled to a single representative on the board of directors of the nonprofit public benefit corporation. 4)Specifies that an authority that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or as, a nonprofit public benefit corporation is not liable for the debts or obligations of the charter school, or for claims arising from the performance of acts, errors, or omissions by the charter school, if the authority has complied with all oversight responsibilities required by law, including, but not limited to, those required by Education Code § 47604.32 and 47605(m). (Education Code § 47604) This bill provides that effective July 1, 2017, charter schools shall only operate as, or be operated by, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, as specified, or a school district, county board of education, or University of California. Comments Need for the bill. According to the author's office, "there have been troubling examples of for profit online charter schools in California that are not serving the academic needs of their students. Some are structured as nonprofit entities, but AB 1084 Page 3 contract with for-profit entities to provide all services, including instructional services. Charter schools receive funding from the State of California to educate their students. It is an inherent conflict-of-interest for a charter school to be operated as a for-profit entity or solely contract with for-profit entities for instructional services. Taxpayer dollars should be spent on academic services and improving the educational experience of California students, not on paying shareholders or enriching a company." Appropriate use of taxpayer dollars? While current law explicitly authorizes a charter school to operate as a nonprofit corporation, statute is silent on whether a charter school is permitted to operate as a for-profit corporation. Because of the permissive nature of the Education Code and absent a clear prohibition, several charter schools are currently operating as for-profit corporations. The California Charter School Association indicates there are six for-profit charter schools in the state. California Virtual Academies (CAVA) is California's largest provider of online public K-12 education and a public charter school network that may exist entirely online, serving approximately 15,000 students. Students take classes from home, primarily communicating with teachers via computer. CAVA's primary vendor and manager is K-12, Inc., a for-profit corporation that operates virtual schools nationwide. Is it an appropriate use of state taxpayer dollars for-profit corporations to operate public schools? Specifically, does this model provide a perverse incentive for these charter schools to limit services for students in order to increase profits? Similar bill vetoed. This bill is similar to AB 787 (Hernandez, 2015) from last year which would have prohibited a charter school from operating as, or being operated by, a for-profit corporation. AB 787 was eventually vetoed by the Governor with the following message: Under this bill, beginning January 1, 2017, a charter school could not "operate as" or be "operated by" a for-profit corporation. AB 1084 Page 4 I don't believe the case has been made to eliminate for-profit charter schools in California. Moreover, the somewhat ambiguous terms used in this bill could be interpreted to restrict the ability of non-profit charter schools to continue using for-profit vendors. It does not appear that this bill addresses the concerns raised in the Governor's veto message. Clarification is necessary. Similar to the concern raised in the Governor's veto message, can the terms regarding this bill's requirement for charters to only be operated by, or operated as, a non-profit entity be interpreted to limit their ability to contract with a for-profit entity, even for day-to-day operations such as payroll, human resources or janitorial services? Would this requirement also extend to contracts in place for other instructional related operations such as the provision of assessments, instructional materials, classroom learning tools, professional development, or more importantly, services required as part of a special education student's individualized education plan? Impact on students. Notwithstanding the issues regarding the appropriateness of using taxpayer dollars for charter schools operating as for-profit corporations, what would happen to students attending these schools if this bill were to become law? Presumably, the operating entities could restructure or reorganize themselves as nonprofit corporations to comply. If not, would a charter school need to shut down its operations? Additionally, as this bill would become operative commencing with the 2017-18 school year, it is not clear if this allows for a sufficient transition period for students that are displaced to find placement in a new school, particularly students that are disabled or have unique learning needs. Currently, there are for-profit virtual charter schools which identify special education or at-risk children and youth as their target student populations. These include students in the juvenile justice system and students who are at risk of dropping out. Virtual charter schools may also be a more viable option among non-traditional students, including exceptional athletes, actors, and high-mobility students, such as children from AB 1084 Page 5 military families. On the other hand, there are charter schools and school districts that currently contract with for-profit entities to offer online curriculum for advanced courses that they are unable to provide. Could this bill potentially lead to a disruption in the educational services provided to these students? Could it also limit local discretion and prohibit arrangements with online programs that have provided students with successful options? Local control and accountability plan (LCAP) process. Implementing Local Control Funding Formula statutes include the requirement that all school districts and county offices of education complete and provide an annual update to their LCAPs. While the various statutes governing charter school authorizations only reference the annual update section of the LCAP, the regulations adopted by the State Board of Education in 2015 regarding the LCAP template reflect the requirement that all local educational agencies, including charter schools, complete an LCAP each year. Further, the 2016-17 budget includes a provision specifying that charter schools must complete an LCAP. Current statute requires an LCAP to include both of the following, a description of the annual goals (for all students and each subgroup of students) to be achieved for each of the state priorities and for any additional local priorities identified by the governing board, and a description of the specific actions the school district will take during each year of the LCAP to achieve these goals, including the enumeration of any specific actions necessary for that year to correct any deficiencies in regard to the state priorities. To the extent there are concerns from parents, students, or the local community regarding the delivery of instruction or the outcomes of students attending a particular online charter school, does the LCAP process provide an effective means to promote change? Responsibility for charter authorizers. As part of the process for considering petitions for the establishment or renewal of a charter school, a description of the educational program of the school is required. This should include the mode of instruction and whether it is online, blended, or classroom-based. Statute AB 1084 Page 6 provides that a school district shall grant a charter if it is satisfied that granting the charter is consistent with sound educational practice, and specifies that the districts shall not deny the petition unless it makes specific findings, including a finding that the charter school present as unsound educational program or that the petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program. As part of the charter petition renewal process, the authorizer is required to consider increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to grant a charter renewal. To the extent there are concerns regarding the use of online instruction provided by a for-profit entity, does the existing petition process allow the opportunity for charter authorizers to sufficiently address these concerns? FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified8/24/16) California Charter Schools Association California Teachers Association OPPOSITION: (Verified8/19/16) California School Employees Association ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 1/27/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, AB 1084 Page 7 Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Mathis Prepared by:Lenin DelCastillo / ED. / (916) 651-4105 8/24/16 10:01:31 **** END ****