BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Senator Tony Mendoza, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 970 Hearing Date: June 10, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Nazarian | |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------| |Version: |April 15, 2015 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Deanna Ping | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Labor Commissioner: enforcement of employee claims. KEY ISSUE Should the Legislature authorize the Labor Commissioner to issue a citation to enforce local minimum wage and overtime laws? Should the Legislature authorize the Labor Commissioner to issue a citation against an employer or person acting on behalf of an employer for violations of existing law related to reimbursements for expenses? ANALYSIS Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides the Labor Commissioner with the authority to investigate employee complaints and allows the Labor Commissioner to hold a hearing in any action to recover wages, including orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission. The Labor Commissioner may require an award in the amount of the AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 2 of ? wages owed, plus interest. (Labor Code §§ 98 & 98.2) Existing law sets civil penalties for any employer or other person acting on behalf of an employer who violates, or causes to be violated, a section of this chapter or any provision regulating hours and days of work in any order of the Industrial Welfare Commission ranging from $50 upon first violation for each underpaid employee for each pay period to $100 for subsequent violations. (Labor Code §558) Existing law states that if upon inspection or investigation the Labor Commissioner determines that a person had paid or caused to be paid a wage for overtime work in violation of provisions relating to hours and days of work in any order of the Industrial Welfare Commission, the Labor Commissioner may issue a citation. (Labor Code §558) Existing law states that the minimum wage for employees fixed by the commission is the minimum wage to be paid to employees, and the payment of a less wage than the minimum is unlawful. (Labor Code §1197) Existing law provides that any employer who pays an employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by the commission shall be subject to a civil penalty, restitution of wages, liquidated damages payable to the employee, and any applicable penalties. (Labor Code §1197.1) Existing law states that if upon inspection or investigation the Labor Commissioner determines that a person had paid or caused to be paid a wage less than the minimum wage the Labor Commissioner may issue a citation. (Labor Code §1197.1) Existing law states that an employer shall indemnify (or compensate) his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee at the time of obeying the directions believed them to be harmful. (Labor Code §2802) This bill : AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 3 of ? 1)Provides that, if upon inspection or investigation the Labor Commissioner determines that a person has violated overtime requirements of existing law, including "any applicable local overtime law," the Labor Commissioner may issue a citation. 2)Provides that, if upon inspection or investigation, the Labor Commissioner determines that a person has paid less than the minimum wage under applicable state or local law, the Labor Commissioner may issue a citation. 3)States that the Labor Commissioner shall not issue a citation against an employer for a violation of any applicable local overtime or minimum wage law if the local entity with jurisdiction in the matter has cited or has initiated an investigation against the employer for the same violation. 4)Authorizes the Labor Commissioner to issue a citation against an employer or person acting on behalf of an employer for violations of existing law related to reimbursement obligations for expenses. COMMENTS 1. Need for this bill? Currently, California workers can file a civil action or may file an administrative complaint with the Labor Commissioner to recover unpaid wages. As was discussed above, an employee who waged a successful civil action to receive unpaid minimum wage balances would be entitled to recover the full amount of the unpaid balance of wages, including interest, reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. Liquidated damages could then also be awarded. After AB 240 of 2012 was enacted, a worker can also be awarded liquidated damages through the Labor Commissioner hearing process. A worker may also recover owed wages as a result from an inspection from the Division of Labor Standards and AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 4 of ? Enforcement's Bureau of Field Enforcement (BOFE). BOFE conducts inspections of industries to ensure compliance with the Labor Code. While BOFE does not pursue individual wage claims, at times the investigation results in an audit of the employer's time and payroll records. If this occurs, the Division will attempt to collect wages for all employees found to have been underpaid. However, the Division cannot collect liquidated damages, requiring the worker to file an administrative complaint with DLSE to collect liquidated damages. Labor Code Section 558, 1197, and 1197.1, provide a legal framework for enforcement of state minimum wage and overtime wage requirements. Local municipalities, such as San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, and San Jose, have implemented local living wage laws. According to the author, current law does not specify that recovery of local minimum wage or overtime wage requirement owed to a worker can be included in the Labor Commissioner/Bureau of Field Enforcement minimum wage citation process and states that higher minimum wage and indemnity charges can only be recovered by a worker either in a civil action or via a Berman hearing. The author notes that this bill allows the Labor Commissioner to issue a citation for employer violations of illegal tool or equipment deductions and encourages compliance with higher local living wage laws by giving the Labor Commissioner the discretion to cite when finding violations of those laws. The author argues that AB 970 is intended to eliminate significant gaps in the Labor Commissioner's citation authority and promotes government efficiency in labor law enforcement, strengthens the deterrent effect of its enforcement efforts, and increases the probability of workers recovering unpaid wages. The author also notes that AB 970 ensures that workers have the same monetary relief whether they pursue their claims administratively, by way of the courts or via the Labor Commissioner's existing authority. 2. Proponent Arguments : According to proponents, existing Labor Code Section 2802 requires an employer to indemnify his or her employees for "all necessary expenditures or losses" incurred by the employee in direct consequence of his or her duties. Proponents note that a very common violation of this provision involves illegal charges AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 5 of ? for tools or equipment necessary to perform the job, but which are deducted from workers' pay notwithstanding. Proponents note that under current law, workers may file a civil action to recover these illegal deductions from their pay, or may seek to recover them in a Berman wage claim hearing. However, proponents argue that the Labor Commissioner cannot issue a citation for this violation, even if she determines upon inspection or investigation that the charges are illegal and have not been repaid to the worker -this bill would specifically authorize the Labor Commissioner to issue citations in such situations. However, proponents state that as more local California authorities have enacted higher minimum wage laws applicable to the lowest paid workers in their jurisdictions, the Labor Commissioner has been processing claims to enforce these higher wage requirements in Berman wage hearings. They argue that this bill recognizes this evolution and authorizes the Labor Commissioner to also issue a citation when she determines an employer has violated an applicable local wage law. Lastly, proponents contend that this bill is likely to make a significant contribution to encouraging compliance with higher local living wage laws by giving the Labor Commissioner the discretion to cite when she finds violations of these laws. Proponents argue that employers would be subject to the same citation amounts, and have the same appeal rights, as would apply if they were cited for a violation of state minimum wage or overtime requirements. Proponents note that the Labor Commissioner has been enforcing these local wage requirements in her wage claim hearings; this bill simply extends authority to cite when violations are encountered in the field. 3. Opponent Arguments : A coalition of employer groups, including the California Chamber of Commerce, opposes this measure, stating that it will subject employers to layers of penalties and enforcement efforts, increased annual assessments, and a limited opportunity to appeal. First, opponents note that beginning in 2009 the costs of state labor law enforcement were primarily transferred from the General Fund to private sector employers through annual assessments on workers' compensation premiums, which are based upon the employers' payroll. Accordingly, any increase in the AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 6 of ? Labor Commissioner's jurisdiction will likely result in an increase to all employers' annual assessments. Employers statewide should not have to pay for these increased assessments for the enforcement of local laws where they are not located. Lastly, opponents state that under the citation process, an employer challenging a citation can request an administrative hearing to contest the citation and may only challenge the administrative ruling pursuant to a writ of mandate. A writ of mandate limits the superior court's scope of review of the evidence and arguments the court may consider for purposes of challenging the administrative ruling. Comparatively, in wage claim adjudication through the Labor Commissioner's office, an employer has a right to a trial de novo to superior court if the employer wants to challenge an administrative ruling, which provides the court with unlimited review of the underlying complaint as well as any new issues, evidence or arguments raised on appeal. Accordingly, to the extent the Labor Commissioner is resolving any local minimum wage violations through the wage claim process, that process provides a fairer opportunity for an employer to appeal a ruling it believes was issued in error rather than the citation process. 4. Prior Legislation : AB 1723 (Nazarian) of 2014 - authorized the Labor Commissioner to include "waiting time" penalties in wage citations AB 442 (Nazarian), Chapter 735, Statutes of 2013 - authorized the Labor Commissioner to collect liquidated damages from an employer who pays an employee less than minimum wage. SUPPORT California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (Sponsor) Bet Tzedek Legal Services California Immigrant Policy Center California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California Nurses Association Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund AB 970 (Nazarian) Page 7 of ? OPPOSITION California Chamber of Commerce Associated Builders and Contractors of California Association General Contractors CAWA - Representing the Automotive Parts Industry California Association for Health Services at Home California Bankers Association California Employment Law Council California Grocers Association California Manufacturers and Technology Association California New Car Dealership Association California Pool & Spa Association California Restaurant Association California Trucking Association Chamber of Commerce Mountain View El Centro Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce Lake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce National Federation of Independent Business Palm Desert Area Chamber of Commerce Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce & Convention-Visitor's Bureau Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce Visitor and Convention Bureau Simi Valley Chamber of Commerce South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce Western Electrical Contractors Association -- END --