BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 895|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 895
          Author:   Rendon (D)
          Introduced:9/1/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE:  10-0, 6/30/15
           AYES:  Hueso, Fuller, Cannella, Hertzberg, Hill, Lara, Leyva,  
            McGuire, Morrell, Pavley
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bates, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 6/1/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Utility rate refunds:  energy crisis litigation


          SOURCE:    Author

          DIGEST:   This bill prospectively allows the Attorney General  
          (AG) or the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to  
          enter into an energy settlement agreement only on a monetary  
          basis.  This bill also prohibits the CPUC from distributing or  
          expending the proceeds of claims recovered by the CPUC in any  
          litigation or settlement to obtain ratepayer recovery for the  
          effects of the 2000-02 energy crisis, and requires the proceeds  
          of any claims arising from that crisis be deposited into the  
          Ratepayer Relief Fund for appropriation by the Legislature.

          ANALYSIS: 
          
          Existing law:









                                                                     AB 895  
                                                                    Page  2



          1)Establishes the Ratepayer Relief Fund in the State Treasury to  
            benefit electricity and natural gas ratepayers, and to fund  
            investigation and litigation costs of the state in pursuing  
            allegations of overcharges and unfair business practices.   
            (Government Code §16428.15) 

          2)Requires that any energy settlement agreement direct  
            settlement funds to the following purposes in priority order:   
            (a) to reduce ratepayer costs of those utility ratepayers  
            harmed by the actions of the settling parties; and (b) for  
            deposit in the Ratepayer Relief Fund.  (Government Code  
            §16428.3)

          3)Authorizes funds deposited in the Ratepayer Relief Fund to be  
            appropriated by the Legislature for purposes that benefit  
            ratepayers.  (Government Code §16428.3)

          This bill:

          1)Prohibits the CPUC from distributing or expending the proceeds  
            of claims in any litigation or settlement to obtain ratepayer  
            recovery for the effects of the 2000-02 energy crisis.

          2)Requires the proceeds of any claims arising from that crisis  
            be deposited into the Ratepayer Relief Fund for appropriation  
            by the Legislature.

          Background
          
          In the latter half of the 1990s, the state restructured its  
          electricity markets to provide more competition.  These efforts  
          were codified in AB 1890 (Brulte, Chapter 854, Statutes of  
          1996).  Soon thereafter, in 2000 and 2001, the state experienced  
          extraordinary wholesale electricity prices in what has become  
          known as the California electricity crisis.  Pacific Gas and  
          Electric declared bankruptcy; Southern California Edison nearly  
          did so.

          Subsequent investigation revealed numerous instances of illegal  
          market manipulation on the part of electricity suppliers.  The  
          state - through the CPUC and the now-defunct Energy Oversight  
          Board and, subsequently, the AG - has been party to litigation  








                                                                     AB 895  
                                                                    Page  3



          related to the energy crisis.  The U.S. Supreme Court recently  
          ruled that energy companies can be sued under state antitrust  
          laws for illegally manipulating natural gas prices during  
          California's 2000-2002 energy crisis.  As a result, there will  
          likely be additional claims relating to the energy crisis, as  
          well as, potentially, additional judgments and settlements that  
          compensate the state.

          In the past, proceeds of claims arising from the energy crisis  
          have been handled differently.  In some instances, the CPUC has  
          directed settlement monies be returned directly to ratepayers.   
          In one instance, however, the CPUC settled with parties to allow  
          in-kind payments to fund installation of electric vehicle  
          charging infrastructure.

          This bill allows the AG or CPUC to enter into an energy  
          settlement agreement only on a monetary basis and expressly  
          prohibits nonmonetary compensation in lieu of monetary  
          compensation.  This provision applies only to settlement  
          agreements entered into before January 1, 2016.  Finally, this  
          bill requires that the proceeds of any claims arising from that  
          crisis be deposited into the Ratepayer Relief Fund for  
          appropriation by the Legislature and specifies that the  
          requirement does not apply to claims brought by an electrical  
          corporation that arise from the energy crisis.

          Prior/Related Legislation
          
          AB 1890 (Brulte, Chapter 854, Statutes of 1996) established a  
          competitive deregulated electricity market in California.

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No            

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Increased revenues, potentially in the billions of dollars, to  
            the Ratepayer Relief Fund (special).

           Potential costs to the General Fund for litigation costs for  
            the AG and the Department of Water Resources (DWR) associated  
            with energy crisis.








                                                                     AB 895  
                                                                    Page  4




           Unknown costs to the state, as a ratepayer, (General Fund and  
            various special funds) to the extent that settlement monies  
            are not deposited in the Electric Power Fund to repay bonds  
            and long-term power contracts entered into by DWR.

           Potential impacts to settlement amounts.

          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/28/15)


          California Manufacturers & Technology Association
          Office of Ratepayer Advocates
          The Utility Reform Network


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/28/15)


          None received


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     The author and proponents contend that  
          the ratepayers should directly benefit from any proceeds  
          resulting from litigation related to the energy crisis.  This  
          bill helps ensure this benefit occurs, unless the Legislature -  
          rather than the CPUC - determines the money should be used for  
          other purposes.
           

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 6/1/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau,  
            Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly,  
            Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,  
            Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,  
            Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,  
            Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,  








                                                                     AB 895  
                                                                    Page  5



            Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Brough

          Prepared by:Jay Dickenson / E., U., & C. / (916) 651-4107
          9/1/15 21:19:44


                                   ****  END  ****