BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 491 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 491 (Gonzalez) As Amended April 30, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------| |Education |7-0 |O'Donnell, Chávez, | | | | |Kim, McCarty, | | | | |Santiago, Thurmond, | | | | |Weber | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Gordon, Holden, | | | | |Jones, Quirk, Rendon, | | | | |Wagner, Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- AB 491 Page 2 SUMMARY: Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to recommend, and the State Board of Education (SBE) to adopt, best practices for the reclassification of English learners, by July 2022. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the CDE, by January 1, 2019, to issue a report that includes the department's findings, research, analysis, recommendations, and best practices with regard to the reclassification of English learners. 2)Requires, by July 1, 2022, the CDE to recommend, and the SBE to adopt, the CDE's recommendations and best practices with regard to the reclassification of English learners. 3)Repeals a requirement for a report required to be completed by January 1, 2017, to address any changes in analysis and recommendations on reclassification resulting from the adoption of the Common Core standards in mathematics and the Next Generation Science Standards. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires the CDE, by January 1, 2014, to review and analyze the criteria, policies, and practices used by a sampling of school districts that represent the geographic, socioeconomic, and demographic diversity of the state to reclassify English learners, and recommend to the Legislature and SBE any guideline, regulatory, or statutory changes that the CDE determines are necessary to identify when English learners are prepared for the successful transition to classrooms and curricula that require English proficiency. 2)Requires, for purposes of completing that review, the CDE to AB 491 Page 3 consult with various parties, and examine: practices of a sampling of school districts, the extent to which current requirements are being followed, and the range of reclassification criteria developed by school districts. 3)Requires the CDE, by January 1, 2014, to issue a report that includes the CDE's findings, research, analysis, recommendations, and identified best practices. 4)Requires, by January 1, 2017, the CDE to issue an updated report that reflects any changes in analysis and recommendations as a result of the adoption by the SBE of the Common Core standards in English language arts and the English Language Development standards. 5)Requires the CDE, with the approval of the SBE, to establish procedures for the reclassification of a student from English learner to English proficient, and requires that the reclassification procedures use multiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a student. 6)Establishes the California English Language Development Test (CELDT) to identify students who are limited English proficient, to determine the level of English proficiency of students, and to assess the progress of English learners in acquiring the skills of listening, speaking, reading, and writing in English. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, one-time General Fund contract costs to the CDE in the range of $450,000 to $670,000 to complete reporting requirements, likely through a contract. CDE states data from an initial report can be used as a foundation for the report required by this bill. Additionally, recent amendments remove a second reporting requirement. These factors suggest costs will likely to be at the AB 491 Page 4 lower end of the estimated range. COMMENTS: Concerns about the current reclassification system. In setting policy regarding the reclassification of English learners, both the state and school districts must strike a delicate balance in order to avoid reclassifying students too early or too late. If students are prematurely reclassified they may lose needed instructional support and may be unprepared to succeed academically. And if reclassification occurs too late, students' academic options may be limited, depriving them of important educational opportunities. The reclassification system for English learners is set out in statute and conducted under guidelines issued by the SBE which specify four criteria for reclassification. There is considerable flexibility under statute and these guidelines. Districts may adopt different thresholds on CELDT and basic skills assessments, and may also adopt additional measures. Two of these measures, while important, are also open-ended in nature. As a result the reclassification process varies by district. SB 1108 history. SB 1108 (Padilla), Chapter 434, Statutes of 2012, required the CDE to undertake a review of the reclassification system, contingent on funding being provided for that purpose. No state funding was provided, and CDE could not use federal funds for this purpose. The CDE entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) which allowed the CDE to share data from the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System for the purpose of the required analysis. The CDE intended that the report would assist in meeting the requirements of SB 1108. The PPIC issued that report in January, 2014, but the CDE believes that it was not sufficient to meet the requirements of SB 1108 or AB 491 Page 5 to form the basis for recommendations to the SBE regarding reclassification. In 2014 the author of SB 1108 introduced a new bill, also numbered SB 1108 (of the 2014 Regular Session), which would have required the CDE to recommend, and the SBE to adopt, best practices regarding reclassification. That bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee. PPIC report on reclassification. In January 2014, the PPIC issued the report described above, Reclassification of English Learners in California Schools. The report provided the first longitudinal analysis of reclassification practices of California schools, using data from 2007-08 through 2012-13 (excluding charter schools), and found that: 1)Reclassified English learners not only outperform English learners, but also often do as well as native English speakers on measures of academic outcomes. 2)More than 90% of districts in the analysis use more demanding criteria than are suggested by the SBE reclassification guidelines. 3)Districts using more stringent reclassification criteria have lower reclassification rates. 4)The use of stricter criteria was associated with better outcomes for reclassified fluent-English-proficient students on standardized tests in sixth grade and 8th grade, more on-time progression in 8th grade, but for students reclassified in 9th grade a reduced likelihood of graduating from high school. The report also noted that two major changes in education pose new questions for the reclassification of English learners: the AB 491 Page 6 Common Core State Standards and the Local Control Funding Formula. The first will require reclassification criteria to be reset with reference to the new Common Core aligned assessment. The Local Control Funding Formula "may reduce districts' incentives to reclassify students," as it does not provide a funding adjustment for reclassified students (though the report noted that many reclassified students are also from low income families and so would continue to generate an adjustment). The report recommended the adoption of one statewide standard for reclassifying students based on the assessments and levels recommended in the guidelines provided by the SBE. It noted that in most cases this would mean a lowering of the standards which districts are currently using. Reclassification criteria in flux as districts transition to new test data. Changes to the state's assessment system are resulting in changes to two of the criteria required to be used in reclassification. The state has not produced statewide assessment data for two years while the transition to Common Core aligned assessments is taking place. This set of data represents the fourth criteria required to be used in reclassification. The CDE has advised districts that current law allows the use of "locally available assessment results," and has provided examples of acceptable assessment data districts could use in the reclassification process. In addition, the first criterion for reclassification is also undergoing transition. Starting in 2017-18, the state will begin using a new Common Core aligned measure of English proficiency to replace the CELDT - the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC). State still needs data for policy decisions around reclassification. There are important policy questions to be answered by the analysis required by SB 1108, with implications for the educational success of many students. The assessments set to be implemented this year and in 2017-18 will have a significant impact on reclassification criteria, so it would appear that the time is right to plan for a new analysis of the system. Both the author and the CDE agree that the PPIC report's findings are an AB 491 Page 7 insufficient basis for recommendations to the SBE on changes to the reclassification system, as proposed by this bill. The author intends that the CDE conduct the analysis required by SB 1108 before making such recommendations. Analysis Prepared by: Tanya Lieberman / ED. / (916) 319-2087 FN: 0000714