BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      AB 53


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   April 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION


                                 Jim Frazier, Chair


          AB 53  
          (Cristina Garcia) - As Amended April 14, 2015


          SUBJECT:  Vehicles:  child safety seats


          SUMMARY:  Requires a child under two years of age to be properly  
          secured in a rear facing child safety seat (CSS) while being  
          transported in a motor vehicle, as specified.  Requires the  
          provisions specified in this bill to become operative on January  
          1, 2017.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires a parent, legal guardian, or the driver of a motor  
            vehicle to properly secure a child under age 8 in the  
            appropriate passenger restraint system while transporting the  
            child in a motor vehicle.


          2)Provides that a violation of the abovementioned requirement is  
            subject to a $100 fine for the first offense and a $250 fine  
            for the second and every subsequent offense.  


          3)Provides a number of exemptions for the abovementioned  
            requirement, including a court issued exemption or a child  








                                                                      AB 53


                                                                    Page  2





            exceeding height and weight requirements, as specified.  


          4)Requires a public or private hospital, clinic, or birthing  
            center to discuss and provide documentation related to the  
            requirements of child passenger restraint systems and  
            transporting a child under age 8, as specified. 


          5)Requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to prepare and  
            disseminate educational materials related to passenger  
            restraint requirements for infants and children under age 15.   



          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown 


          COMMENTS:  A report released in 2010 by the National Highway  
          Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that injuries  
          suffered in a motor vehicle traffic crashes are the leading  
          cause of death among children in the United States.  The report  
          further concluded that various studies have shown that children  
          who are correctly using the appropriate restraint for their  
          sizes and ages are at a significantly lower risk of sustaining  
          serious or fatal injuries. Additionally, the Centers for Disease  
          Control and Prevention reports that motor vehicle fatalities are  
          the second leading cause of death for children age two and  
          under.  


          In March 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released  
          a revised set of passenger safety recommendations when  
          transporting children under age 13 in a motor vehicle.  AAP's  
          recommendation included having infants and toddlers ride in  
          rear-facing CSS until they reach two years of age or until they  
          reach the maximum weight or height allowed by the CSS  
          manufacturer.  This recommendation also advises state lawmakers  
          to consider "phasing-in" the rear-facing requirement over a  








                                                                      AB 53


                                                                    Page  3





          minimum two-year period in order to educate parents on the  
          safety benefits of rear-facing CSSs.  


          The AAP's recommendations were based on the evaluation of a  
          series of studies and research that determined, when properly  
          used, CSSs reduce the risk of injury by 71% to 82% and reduce  
          the risk of death by 28% when compared to children of the same  
          age only using a seatbelt.  The research shows that, during an  
          accident, a rear facing CSS benefits children under age two due  
          to the increased support to the child's head that is relatively  
          larger, heavier, and more developed than the child's neck and  
          spine. Thus, the potential for a child's head to snap forward  
          and break their necks and/or injure their spinal cords is  
          significantly minimized.     


          Although the safety benefits of using a rear facing CSS is well  
          documented, studies indicate many parents turn CSSs front facing  
          too early.  For example, a study by the University of Michigan  
          found that only 23% of parents kept their child in a rear facing  
          CSS until age two.  On the other hand, other reports show  
          parents are reluctant to keep a child rear facing in order to  
          avoid distractions from an uncooperative child or due to the  
          lack of leg room (depending on the size of the vehicle).  


          This bill intends to reduce the injury risk of infants and  
          toddlers involved in motor vehicle accidents by requiring  
          children under age two to be placed in a rear facing CSS when  
          transported in a motor vehicle.  This bill also includes  
          exemptions based on a child's height and weight in addition to  
          requiring parents to comply with the CSS manufacturer's height  
          and weight limitations.  The author notes, this bill "will help  
          protect against the tragedy of traffic fatalities involving  
          toddlers and keep California children safe. California could be  
          the first state in the nation to pass this important law to  
          protect our youngest residents."  









                                                                      AB 53


                                                                    Page  4






          Double referral:  This bill will be referred to the Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee should it pass out of this committee.


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          American Academy of Pediatrics, California


          American College of Emergency Physicians, California Chapter


          California Association of Highway Patrolmen


          Early Edge California


          El Camino Children and Family Services Inc. 


          National Safety Council


          Nationwide Insurance


          State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 


          Personal Insurance Federation of California









                                                                      AB 53


                                                                    Page  5






          Zero to Three, Western Office




          Opposition


          None on file 




          Analysis Prepared by:Manny Leon / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093