BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 45 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 20, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 45 (Mullin) - As Amended April 30, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Local Government |Vote:|6 - 3 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | |Environmental Safety and Toxic | |4 - 2 | | |Materials | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: Yes SUMMARY: This bill requires local jurisdictions that provide for the residential collection and disposal of solid waste to increase AB 45 Page 2 the collection and diversion of household hazardous waste (HHW), as defined. Specifically, this bill: 1)Exempts jurisdictions that do not provide for the residential collection and disposal of solid waste from the requirements of the bill. 2)Authorizes CalRecycle to adopt regulations for implementation and a model ordinance for the collection of HHW. 3)Requires, on or before July 1, 2016, each jurisdiction to inform CalRecycle of its HHW baseline collection and diversion amount. 4)Requires, on or before July 1, 2020, each jurisdiction to increase its HHW collection and diversion by 15% over its baseline amount. Allows an additional two years for compliance for any jurisdiction that has adopted a comprehensive program. 5)Requires, jurisdictions to annually report to CalRecycle beginning January 1, 2020. FISCAL EFFECT: 1) Increased annual costs to CalRecyle in the range of $500,000 to $700,000 (special fund). 2) Unknown significant reimbursable local costs, potentially in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars range (GF). AB 45 Page 3 COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, althought it is illegal to dispose of HHW in the trash, down the drain, or by abandonment, people may not know the hazardous effects of these products on human health, animals and the environment. The author further states, data shows California averages a convenience or participation rate of only 7%. Although there are other means of collecting HHW products, this paltry participation rate shows how much improvement the state can make in the future. This bill requires local jurisdictions to divert, reduce or increase participation rates of household hazardous waste (HHW) from landfills and waterways. 2)Background. Universal waste, which is regulated by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), is primarily from consumer products containing mercury, lead, cadmium and other substances that are hazardous to human health and the environment. Examples of universal waste are batteries, fluorescent tubes, and many electronic devices. These items cannot be discarded in household trash, nor disposed of in landfills. Current law requires each city and county to prepare, adopt and submit an HHW plan, as part of its integrated waste management plan, for the safe collection, recycling, treatment, and disposal of hazardous wastes generated by households. AB 45 Page 4 A local jurisdiction may implement its HHW plan in a variety of ways, including door-to-door collection, periodic community-wide or neighborhood HHW collection, permanent HHW drop-off sites, and collection events. Each jurisdiction in California is mandated to submit a form annually to CalRecycle (Form 303) with data regarding the amount of HHW, including universal waste and other related waste collected by local programs and the methods for managing these waste streams. There are currently 209 local agencies participating in the submission of Form 303. 3)Related Legislation. AB 1159 (Gordon), also on today's agenda, establishes a pilot product stewardship program for the management of medical sharps and household primary batteries. This Committee will hear this bill today. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081