BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |AB 2 |Hearing |6/10/15 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Alejo |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |3/26/15 |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Weinberger | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION AND INVESTMENT AUTHORITIES Allows local governments to form Community Revitalization and Investment Authorities to administer economic development and affordable housing programs. Background and Existing Law Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities. Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities, and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 budget, AB X1 26 (Blumenfield, 2011) dissolved all RDAs. The California Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB X1 26, but invalidated AB X1 27 (Blumenfield, 2011), which would have allowed most RDAs to avoid dissolution. RDAs used property tax revenues generated by growth in the assessed value of properties in a project area - commonly known as tax increment revenues - to finance their redevelopment activities. RDAs' dissolution deprived many local governments of the primary tool they used to eliminate physical and economic AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 2 of ? blight, finance new construction, improve public infrastructure, rehabilitate existing buildings, and increase the supply of affordable housing. Cities and counties can create infrastructure financing districts (IFDs) and issue bonds to pay for community scale public works: highways, transit, water systems, sewer projects, flood control, child care facilities, libraries, parks, and solid waste facilities. To repay the bonds, IFDs can divert property tax increment revenues. However, IFDs can't divert property tax increment revenues from schools (SB 308, Seymour, 1990). Last year, in response to RDAs' dissolution, legislators enacted SB 628 (Beall, 2014) to allow local officials to create Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs), which augment the tax increment financing powers that are available to local government under the IFD statutes. City or county officials can create an EIFD, which is governed by a public finance authority, to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community. Some legislators, local government officials, affordable housing advocates, and others continue to seek additional tax increment financing tools to promote local economic development. Proposed Law Assembly Bill 2 allows local government officials to establish a Community Revitalization and Investment Authority (authority) and use property tax increment revenues to finance the implementation of a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment area. Assembly Bill 2 specifies: I. The process for creating an authority. II. Criteria for establishing a community revitalization and investment area. III. The powers and duties that apply to an authority. IV. The process for adopting a community revitalization and investment plan. AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 3 of ? V. How tax increment revenues are allocated to, and used by, an authority. VI. An authority's obligations relating to affordable housing. VII. Reporting, accountability, and audit requirements. I. Formation process . Assembly Bill 2 allows local governments to form an authority in two ways: A city, county, or city and county can adopt a resolution creating an authority governed by a five-member board that is appointed by the city, county, or city and county's legislative body. Three board members must be members of the city, county, or city and county's legislative body and two must be public members who live or work within the community revitalization and investment area. A city, county, city and county, and special district, in any combination, may create an authority by entering into a joint powers agreement. The authority's governing body must be comprised of a majority of members from the legislative bodies of the public agencies that created the authority. The governing body must include at least two public members who are appointed by a majority of the authority's board and must live or work within the community revitalization and investment area. Assembly Bill 2 prohibits: School entities from participating in a community revitalization and investment authority. Redevelopment successor agencies from participating in a community revitalization and investment authority. A city or county that created a former redevelopment agency from forming a community revitalization and investment authority, unless the former redevelopment agency's successor agency has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance, and complies with other specified conditions. II. Community revitalization and investment areas . Assembly Bill 2 allows an authority to carry out a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment area. The bill requires that at least 80% of the AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 4 of ? land calculated by census tracts or census block groups within the area must be characterized by both of the following conditions: An annual median household income that is less than 80% of the statewide annual median income. Three of the following four conditions: o Nonseasonal unemployment that is at least 3% higher than the statewide median, as defined by a specified labor market report. o Crime rates that are 5% higher than the statewide median crime rate, as defined by a specified Department of Justice report. o Deteriorated or inadequate infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, water supply, sewer treatment or processing, and parks. o Deteriorated commercial or residential structures. Assembly Bill 2 also allows an Authority to carry out a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment area established within a former military base that is principally characterized by deteriorated or inadequate infrastructure and structures. The governing board of an Authority established within a former military base must include a member of the military base closure commission as a public member. Assembly Bill 2 allows the legislative body or bodies of the local government or governments that created the authority to appropriate any amount the legislative body or bodies deem necessary for the administrative expenses and overhead of the authority. The money appropriated may be paid to the authority as a grant to defray the expenses and overhead, or as a loan to be repaid upon the terms and conditions as the legislative body may provide. If appropriated as a loan, the property owners within the plan area must be made third-party beneficiaries of the repayment of the loan. The bill specifies that the term, "administrative expense" includes expenses of planning and AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 5 of ? dissemination of information. III. Powers and duties . Assembly Bill 2 directs that an Authority has the following powers and duties: Provide funding to rehabilitate, repair, upgrade, or construct infrastructure. Provide for low- and moderate-income housing. Remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances pursuant to the Polanco Redevelopment Act or other specified statutes authorizing hazardous material cleanup. Provide for seismic retrofits of existing buildings. Acquire and transfer real property in accordance with specified statutes, including through the use of eminent domain. An authority must retain controls and establish restrictions or covenants running with the land sold or leased for private use for such periods of time and under such conditions as are provided in the community revitalization and investment plan. The bill declares the establishment of such controls to be a public purpose. Issue bonds. Borrow money, receive grants, or accept financial or other assistance or investment from the state or the federal government or any other public agency or private lending institution for any project within its area of operation, and comply with any conditions of the loan or grant. Adopt a community revitalization plan. Make loans or grants for owners or tenants to improve, rehabilitate, or retrofit buildings or structures within the plan area. Construct foundations, platforms, and other like structural forms necessary for the provision or utilization of air rights sites for buildings to be used for residential, commercial industrial, or other uses contemplated by a revitalization plan AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 6 of ? With specified exceptions, provide direct assistance to businesses within the plan area in connection with new or existing facilities for industrial or manufacturing uses. Assembly Bill 2 deems an Authority to be a local public agency subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act, the Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act. IV. Community revitalization and investment plans . Assembly Bill 2 requires an Authority to adopt a community revitalization and investment plan that may include a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds generated within the area, provided the plan includes: A statement of the plan's principal goals and objectives, including territory to be covered by the plan. A description of the deteriorated or inadequate infrastructure within the area and a program for construction of adequate infrastructure or repair or upgrading of existing infrastructure. A program to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances, if applicable. A program to provide funding for or otherwise facilitate the economic revitalization of the area. A fiscal analysis setting forth the projected receipt of revenue and projected expenses over a five-year planning horizon. Time limits designating the maximum length of time an Authority can establish debt, act pursuant to a plan, repay debt, and commence eminent domain proceedings. Assembly Bill 2 specifies the manner in which an authority must consider adoption of the plan, including requiring public hearing, a protest process and, in some cases, voter approval of the plan through a specified election process. Assembly Bill 2 directs that an authority must consider and adopt a plan amendment in accordance with the procedures that applied to the consideration and adoption of the original plan. AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 7 of ? V. Tax increment financing . Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution allows local officials to use property tax increment revenues to repay bonds, debts, and loans needed to finance a redevelopment project. Assembly Bill 2 deems a community revitalization and investment authority to be the "agency" described in Article XVI, Section 16 for purposes of receiving tax increment revenues. Assembly Bill 2 allows a community revitalization and investment plan to include a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds. Assembly Bill 2 allows any city, county, or special district that receives ad valorem property taxes from property located within an area to adopt a resolution directing the county auditor-controller to allocate its share of tax increment funds within the area covered by the plan to the authority. The resolution may direct the county auditor-controller to allocate less than the full amount of the tax increment, establish a maximum amount of time in years that the allocation takes place, or limit the use of the funds by the authority for specific purposes or programs. A resolution may be repealed by giving the county auditor-controller 60 days' notice. However, the county auditor-controller must continue to allocate the taxing entity's taxes that have been pledged to repay debt issued by the authority until the debt has been fully repaid. Assembly Bill 2 requires that, before adopting a resolution allocating a share of its tax increment funds to an authority, a city, county, or special district must approve a memorandum of understanding with the authority governing the authority's use of tax increment funds for administrative and overhead expenses. Assembly Bill 2 requires that a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds must become effective in the tax year that begins after the December 1 following the adoption of the plan. Assembly Bill 2 specifies the manner in which a county auditor-controller must allocate tax revenue to an authority upon adoption of a plan that includes a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds. AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 8 of ? Assembly Bill 2 requires that an authority's plan for an area that includes land formerly or currently designated as part of a redevelopment area must subordinate tax increment amounts received by the authority to any preexisting enforceable obligation, as defined in statute. VI. Affordable housing . Assembly Bill 2 enacts extensive affordable housing set-aside, maintenance and replacement requirements. Specifically, the bill: Requires that at least 25% of all tax increment revenues that are allocated to the authority must be deposited into a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and used by the authority for the purposes of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing available at affordable housing cost, as defined in state law. Allows an authority to exercise any or all of its powers for the construction, rehabilitation, or preservation of affordable housing for extremely low, very low, low- and moderate-income persons or families. Enumerates detailed requirements governing the manner in which an authority may manage and expend tax increment revenues deposited into a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Requires every community revitalization plan to contain a provision that whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low- and moderate-income housing market as part of a revitalization project the authority must, within two years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing costs, as defined by state law, within the territorial jurisdiction of the authority. Requires an authority to prepare a feasible method or plan for relocating: o Families and persons to be temporarily or AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 9 of ? permanently displaced from housing facilities in the plan area. o Nonprofit local community institutions to be temporarily or permanently displaced from facilities used for institutional purposes in the project area. VII. Reporting, Accountability, and Audits . Assembly Bill 2 requires an Authority to review a community revitalization and investment plan at least annually and make any amendments that are necessary and appropriate in accordance with specified statutory provisions. An authority must require the preparation of an annual independent financial audit paid for from its revenues. Assembly Bill 2 requires an authority, after holding a public hearing, to adopt an annual report on or before June 30 of each year and specifies the manner in which the authority must make the report available to the public. Assembly Bill 2 requires the annual report to contain specified information and prohibits an authority from spending specified tax increment revenues if it fails to provide the annual report. Assembly Bill 2 requires an authority, every 10 years, to conduct a protest proceeding at a public hearing to consider whether the property owners and residents within the plan area wish to present oral or written protests against the authority. The authority must consider all written and oral protests received before the close of the public hearing. A majority protest exists if protests have been filed representing over 50% of the combined number of property owners and residents, at least 18 years of age or older, in the area. If there is a majority protest, Assembly Bill 2 requires the authority to call an election of the property owners and residents in the area covered by the plan, and prohibits the authority from initiating or authorizing any new projects until the election is held. The election must be held within 90 days of the public hearing and may be held by mail-in ballot. The authority must adopt, at a duly noticed public hearing, procedures for holding the election. If a majority of the property owners and residents vote against the authority, then it must not take any further action to implement the plan on and AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 10 of ? after the date of the election. This prohibition does not prevent the authority from taking any and all actions and appropriating and expending funds. Assembly Bill 2 requires an authority to contract every five years for an independent audit to determine compliance with affordable housing maintenance and replacement requirements, including provisions to ensure that the requirements are met within each five-year period covered by the audit. The audit must be conducted according to guidelines established by the Controller. An authority must provide a copy of the completed audit to the Controller. If an audit demonstrates a failure to comply with the statutory requirements, an authority must adopt and submit to the Controller, as part of the audit, a plan to achieve compliance with those provisions as soon as feasible, but not less than two years following the findings. The Controller must review and approve the plan, and require the plan to stay in effect until compliance is achieved. The plan must include one or more of the following means of achieving compliance: The expenditure of an additional 10% of gross tax increment revenue on increasing, preserving, and improving the supply of low-income housing. An increase in the production, by an additional 10%, of housing for very low-income households. The targeting of specified expenditures exclusively to rental housing affordable to, and occupied by, persons of very low and extremely low income. Assembly Bill 2 enumerates penalties that apply to an authority that fails to provide a copy of a completed audit to the Controller after receiving a written notice from the Controller. Penalty amounts can be $2,500 to as much $10,000, depending on an authority's revenues. The penalties are doubled for a second consecutive year of failure and tripled for a third or more consecutive year. After three or more consecutive years, the Controller must conduct its own financial audit report for which the authority must pay. The Attorney General may, at the Controller's request, take action to collect the fines. AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 11 of ? State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . Eliminating redevelopment agencies did not eliminate the need for California communities to build more affordable housing, eliminate blight, foster business activity, clean up contaminated brownfields, and create jobs. AB 2 establishes a new approach to local economic development and housing policy that is focused on the state's disadvantaged communities. AB 2 fosters collaboration between cities and counties on local economic development efforts and mitigates the zero-sum competition for scarce property tax revenues among cities, counties, and school districts. To ensure public accountability, the bill requires a community revitalization and investment authority to conduct an annual review and reporting process, and periodically allows local residents to prohibit an Authority from taking further actions. While it is unrealistic to expect that a single economic development tool will work in all California communities, AB 2 is a viable option for bringing vital investments to communities that most need employment opportunities, crime reduction, upgraded infrastructure, brownfield remediation, and affordable housing. 2. Wait and see ? After the Supreme Court's 2011 Matosantos decision dissolved all RDAs, legislators introduced a wide variety of bills creating new tax increment financing tools to pay for local economic development. Last year, elements of several of those bills were integrated into SB 628 (Beall, 2014), which created a new Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) tax increment financing mechanism for local governments. It is too early judge how well the new EIFD structure will work for most local governments and AB 2's proponents assert that it would be unrealistic to expect that a single approach to tax increment financing will meet the needs of every local community. However, in light of SB 628's recent enactment, legislators may wish to consider whether it is premature to enact another complex set of statutes granting new tax increment financing powers to local governments. 3. Eminent domain . One tool that AB 2 would grant local AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 12 of ? governments that is not available through an EIFD is the power to take private property through the power of eminent domain and to pay for it using tax increment revenues. Some property owners object to the way in which former redevelopment agencies used their eminent domain authority, arguing that RDA's use of eminent domain hurt businesses and depressed property values in some communities. They oppose the provisions in AB 2 which would allow community revitalization and investment authorities to use land acquisition and management powers that largely replicate the powers granted to former redevelopment agencies under the Community Redevelopment Act. 4. Plan approval . AB 2 specifies the process by which an authority must approve a community revitalization and investment plan. Some of the approval requirements appear to be inconsistent. The bill allows an authority, after holding three hearings, to adopt a plan by ordinance if no majority protest exists. However, the bill also requires that an Authority must call an election if more than 25%, but less than 50%, of property owners and residents file protests. It is unclear whether the authority's adoption of an ordinance is intended to be conditional on the outcome of the election. The Committee may wish to consider amending AB 2 to clarify the bill's plan approval requirements by specifying that an authority can approve a plan by adopting an ordinance only if less than 25% of property owners and residents file protests. 5. Let's get technical . To clarify AB 2's provisions, the Committee may wish to consider amending the bill to make the following changes: On page 8, line 26, delete "62006" and insert "62005" On page 16, line 40, delete "62006" and insert "62005" 6. Legislative history . AB 2 is similar to AB 1080 (Alejo, 2013), which the Senate Governance & Finance Committee approved 4-1, but which later died in the Senate Appropriations Committee. AB 2 is also similar to AB 2280 (Alejo, 2014) which Governor Brown vetoed. The Governor's veto message for AB 2280 stated, in part: I applaud the author's efforts to create an economic development program, with voter approval, that focuses on disadvantaged communities and communities with high AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 13 of ? unemployment. The bill, however, unnecessarily vests this new program in redevelopment law. I look forward to working with the author to craft an appropriate legislative solution. To address the Governor's concerns, AB 2 takes portions of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) and incorporates it into the bill, rather than cross-referencing the CRL. 7. Double referral . The Senate Rules Committee has ordered a double-referral of AB 2, first to the Senate Governance & Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over the statutes governing local governments' finances, and then to the Senate Transportation & Housing Committee, which has jurisdiction over the bill's housing provisions. Assembly Actions Assembly Housing & Community Development Committee: 6-1 Assembly Local Government Committee: 7-2 Assembly Appropriations Committee: 13-3 Assembly Floor: 63-13 Support and Opposition (6/4/15) Support : African American Caucus, League of California Cities; American Planning Association, California Chapter; The ARC California; Asian and Pacific Islander Caucus, League of California Cities; Building Owners and Managers Association of California; California Apartment Association; California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce; California Association for Local Economic Development; California Building Industry Association; California Business Properties Association; California Chamber of Commerce; California Coalition for Rural Housing; California Special Districts Association; Cities of Hesperia, Indian Wells, Lakewood, Mendota, Rosemead, Sacramento, Salinas, Thousand Oaks; Glendale City Employees Association; Housing California; International Council of Shopping Centers; Latino Caucus, League of California Cities; Leading Age California; League of California Cities; NAIOP of California, the Commercial Real AB 2 (Alejo) 3/26/15 Page 14 of ? Estate Development Association; Organization of SMUD Employees; San Bernardino Public Employees Association; San Luis Obispo County Employees Association; Transportation Agency of Monterey County; United Cerebral Palsy California Collaboration. Opposition : California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights; Fieldstead and Company. -- END --