AB 999,
as amended, Bonta. begin deleteInmates: pilot project. end deletebegin insertPrisoner Protections for Family and Community Health Act.end insert
Under existing law, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is responsible for the administration of the state prisons.begin insert Existing law makes it a crime to engage in sodomy while incarcerated in a state prison and existing regulation prohibits inmates from participating in illegal sexual acts.end insert
begin insertThis bill would require the department to develop a 5-year plan to extend the availability of condoms in all California prisons. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2015, that no less than 5 prisons be incorporated into the program each year, and would require a comprehensive plan including every prison in the state by the final year. The bill would make related findings and declarations.
end insertThis bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to expand a successful pilot program that was established at California State Prison, Solano.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertChapter 10.9 (commencing with Section 6500)
2is added to Title 7 of Part 3 of the end insertbegin insertPenal Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
3
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
8Prisoner Protections for Family and Community Health Act.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
10(a) Assembly Bill 1334 of the 2007--08 Regular Session would
11have required the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
12to allow nonprofits and health agencies to enter department
13institutions to provide sexual barrier protection devices such as
14condoms to state prisoners.
15(b) In his October 14, 2007, veto message, Governor Arnold
16Schwarzenegger noted that, although it is illegal to engage in
17sexual activity while incarcerated, providing access to condoms
18is “consistent with the need to improve our prison healthcare
19system and overall public health.”
20(c) The veto message
directed the department to determine the
21risk and viability of such a program by identifying one state prison
22facility for the purpose of allowing nonprofits and health agencies
23to distribute sexual barrier devices.
24(d) To accomplish the Governor’s directive, a pilot program
25was implemented in Solano State Prison, Facility II, for one year,
26from November 5, 2008, through November 4, 2009. Several
27agencies covered all costs and volunteered their staff time and
28expertise.
29(e) The Center for Health Justice, a nonprofit organization,
30purchased the condom dispensing machines and condoms,
31monitored and refilled the dispensers throughout the pilot period,
32and provided education for staff and inmates.
33(f) Researchers from the Division of Correctional Health Care
34Services, Public Health Unit; the State Department of Public
35
Health, Office of AIDS, and the Sexually Transmitted Disease
36Control Branch provided evaluation services and finalized their
37conclusions in a September 2011 report entitled: Evaluation of a
P3 1Prisoner Condom Access Pilot Program Conducted in One
2California State Prison Facility.
3(g) The report concluded that there was no evidence that the
4availability of condoms created an increased risk of breaches of
5safety or security, or resulted in injury to staff or inmates in a
6general population prison facility setting.
7(h) The report also stated that its findings may not be
8generalizable to other settings, for example, because of higher
9security or in a setting dedicated to inmates with mental health
10problems. Additional pilot studies may be warranted in these other
11settings.
12(i) The report concluded that providing condoms
from
13dispensing machines similar to those used in the pilot program is
14feasible and of relatively low cost to implement and maintain.
15(j) Estimates of the in-prison HIV and STD transmission rates
16are not available. However, given the relatively low cost of
17providing condoms relative to the cost of treating HIV, and that
18very few HIV infections would need to be prevented to cover the
19costs of the program, it is likely that providing condoms could
20reduce department medical costs.
(a) Based on the recommendations contained in the
22“Evaluation of a Prisoner Condom Access Pilot Program
23Conducted in One California State Prison Facility” report, and
24in light of the successful pilot project conducted at California State
25Prison, Solano, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
26shall develop a five-year plan to expand the availability of condoms
27in all California prisons.
28(b) Commencing January 1, 2015, no less than five prisons, as
29determined by the department, shall be incorporated into the
30program each year, with the final year yielding a comprehensive
31plan that includes every prison in the state.
32(c) In developing the plan, the department shall
consider all of
33the following recommendations that were made in the report:
34(1) Initiate and incrementally expand a program to provide
35inmates with access to condoms while continuing to monitor the
36safety and acceptability of the program.
37(2) Consider additional pilot studies in settings that may pose
38a serious health or safety risk, for example, higher security
39facilities or housing for inmates with serious mental health
40problems.
P4 1(3) Mount dispensers in discreet locations to provide
2confidential access and increase accessibility by minimizing
3inoperability due to vandalism. Dispensers with solid steel
4construction and protected locks are available that are more
5tamper resistant than those used in the pilot study.
6(4) Consider making condoms available
confidentially upon
7request during a medical or mental health visit, in addition to
8dispensing machines.
9(5) Provide information to staff and inmates describing findings
10from the current study demonstrating that safety and security were
11not impacted by the distribution of condoms.
12(6) Include inmate peer educators, inmates’, Men’s, and
13Women’s advisory counsels, and medical, public health, and
14custody staff in local institutional condom program planning and
15implementation.
It is the intent of the Legislature to enact
17legislation to expand a successful pilot program that was
18established at California State Prison, Solano.
O
98