Amended in Assembly April 9, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 147


Introduced by Assembly Member V. Manuel Pérez

begin insert

(Principal coauthor: Senator Hueso)

end insert

January 18, 2013


An act add to Article 3 (commencing with Sectionbegin delete 2950)end deletebegin insert 2951)end insert to Chapter 13 of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, relating to the environment.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 147, as amended, V. Manuel Pérez. Environment: Salton Sea: dust mitigation.

Existing law establishes the Salton Sea Restoration Fund that is administered by the Director of Fish and Game and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, used for the restoration of the Salton Sea.

Existing law implements the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA), which was entered into by various parties to budget their portions of California’s apportionment of Colorado River water and to provide a framework for conservation measures and water transfers for a period of up to 75 years. Existing law provides for a framework to mitigate the environmental impacts on the Salton Sea caused by the QSA water transfer.

This bill would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, upon the execution of an agreement with specified air quality management districts, to develop, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board and the Salton Sea Authority, a strategic plan, containing specified elements, to guide the implementation of a project to monitor and mitigate dust pollution created at the Salton Sea as a result of the implementation of the QSA.

This bill would establish the Salton Sea Dust Mitigation Project Account in the Salton Sea Restoration Fund for the purposes of receiving moneys to fund the implementation of the project, and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the account would be used to mitigate dust pollution arising from the implementation of the QSA.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

(a)  The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

end insert
begin insert

3(1) The Salton Sea is California’s largest lake, covering 365
4square miles, and it serves as an important stop on the annual
5Pacific Flyway migratory route, supporting over 400 species of
6birds and representing over two-thirds of all birds in the
7continental United States.

end insert
begin insert

8(2) The Salton Sea is located in the Imperial Valley and
9Coachella Valley of southern California and rests in close
10proximity to thousands of residents.

end insert
begin insert

11(3) In 2003, the Legislature enacted statutes (Chapters 611,
12612, and 613 of the Statutes of 2003) to facilitate the execution
13and implementation of the Quantification Settlement Agreement
14(QSA) and related agreements, including a transfer of conserved
15water from the Imperial Irrigation District to the San Diego Water
16Authority. As part of those statutes, the Legislature declared its
17intent that the State of California undertake the restoration of the
18Salton Sea ecosystem and the permanent protection of wildlife
19dependent on the ecosystem.

end insert
begin insert

20(4) Implementation of the water transfer from the Imperial
21Irrigation District to the San Diego Water Authority will reduce
22 agricultural drainage inflow to the Salton Sea, reducing the sea’s
23depth and result in the exposure of currently submerged sea
24lakebed.

end insert
begin insert

25(5) The exposure of previously submerged sea lakebed has the
26potential to significantly increase fugitive dust emissions for
27particulate matter of 10 or less microns in diameter (PM10) as
P3    1winds blow across exposed lakebed eroded fine-grained sediments
2and salts, lofting them into the air.

end insert
begin insert

3(6) At Owens Lake, a lake drained by the Los Angeles
4Department of Water and Power, the cost of mitigation fugitive
5dust emissions arising from the exposed lakebed has reached
6$1,200,000,000.

end insert
begin insert

7(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to develop a strategic plan
8for dealing with air pollution resulting from the QSA, including
9quantifying the extent of dust pollution, cataloging the chemicals
10likely to be present in the dust pollution, including
11dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethan from decades of agricultural runoff
12draining into the Salton Sea, and identifying additional funding
13mechanisms to pay for mitigation costs, including, but not limited
14to, harvesting the renewable energy generating potential of the
15Salton Sea.

end insert
16

begin deleteSECTION 1.end delete
17begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

Article 3 (commencing with Sectionbegin delete 2950)end deletebegin insert 2951)end insert is
18added to Chapter 13 of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, to
19read:

20 

21Article 3.  Dust Mitigation
22

 

begin delete
23

2950.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

24(a) The Salton Sea is California’s largest lake, covering 365
25square miles, and it serves as an important stop on the annual
26Pacific Flyway migratory route, supporting over 400 species of
27birds and representing over two-thirds of all birds in the continental
28United States.

29(b) The Salton Sea is located in the Imperial Valley and
30Coachella Valley of southern California, and rests in close
31proximity to over 400,000 residents.

32(c) In 2003, the Legislature enacted legislation implementing
33the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA), a water transfer
34agreement between the Imperial Irrigation District and the San
35Diego Metropolitan Water District, that represented the largest
36agriculture-to-urban water transfer in the history of the United
37States.

38(d) According to an analysis by the Pacific Institute, by 2018,
39reduced water inflows to the sea will reduce the sea’s depth by
40five feet, resulting in the exposure of 26.5 square miles of currently
P4    1submerged lake bed. By 2037, the sea’s depth will drop by up to
227 feet, resulting in the exposure of 134 square miles of lake bed.

3(e) From 1913 to 1924, inclusive, a similar rural-to-urban water
4transfer occurred when the Los Angeles Department of Water and
5Power (LADWP) began exporting water from Owens Lake to Los
6Angeles. After only 11 years, LADWP had successfully drained
7all but a fraction of Owens Lake, exposing over 100 square miles
8of lake bed.

9(f) For decades, the winds blowing across the exposed lake bed
10of Owens Lake eroded fine-grained sediments and salts, lofting
11them into the air, creating the single largest source of fugitive dust
12in the United States.

13(g) In 1987, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
14classified the southern Owens Valley as being in violation of
15National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate
16matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10) and, in 1993,
17reclassified the region as a “serious non-attainment” area for PM10
18standards.

19(h) After years of continued noncompliance with the PM10
20standards, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
21ordered California to produce a plan for achieving compliance in
22the Owens Valley.

23(i) In 1997, the Great Basin Air Pollution Control District, which
24 has oversight of the Owens Valley, exercised its authority under
25Section 42316 of the Health and Safety Code to require the
26LADWP to undertake reasonable measures to mitigate the air
27quality problems caused by the draining of Owens Lake, which
28was adopted as part of the 1998 State Implementation Plan.

29(j) Since 1998, LADWP has spent one billion two hundred
30million dollars ($1,200,000,000) to stem dust pollution in Owens
31Valley mainly by flooding a 40-square-mile area of exposed lake
32bed at a cost of 30 billion gallons of water a year.

33(k) In 2012, the State Air Resources Board upheld an additional
34order by the Great Basin Air District that required LADWP to
35flood an additional three square miles of exposed lake bed at an
36estimated cost of four hundred million dollars ($400,000,000).
37LADWP has appealed the state’s order in federal court.

38(l) Under the QSA, the state agreed to cover the cost of
39mitigating the effects of the water transfer on the Salton Sea beyond
P5    1the first one hundred thirty-three million dollars ($133,000,000)
2in costs.

3(m) The Third District Court of Appeal, in In Re Quantification
4Settlement Agreement Cases (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 758 (QSA
5decision), ruled that while the state was liable for covering
6mitigation costs above the first one hundred thirty-three million
7dollars ($133,000,000), it was entirely up to the Legislature to
8appropriate the money to pay for those costs pursuant to Article
916 of Section 7 of the California Constitution.

10(n) Given that LADWP will likely spend up to one billion six
11hundred million dollars ($1,600,000,000) to mitigate dust pollution
12resulting from its draining of Owens Lake, and the likelihood that
13 mitigating dust pollution created by the Salton Sea will be
14substantially more expensive because up to 135 square miles of
15lake bed will be exposed as compared to only 100 square miles at
16Owens Lake, and the uncertainty of whether the state can be held
17liable for covering mitigation costs given the QSA decision, it is
18the intent of the Legislature in enacting this part to develop a
19strategic plan for dealing with air pollution resulting from the QSA,
20including quantifying the extent of dust pollution, cataloging the
21chemicals likely to be present in the dust pollution including
22dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethan or “DDT” from decades of
23agricultural runoff draining in the sea, and identifying additional
24funding mechanisms to pay for mitigation costs, including
25harvesting the renewable energy generating potential of the Salton
26Sea.

end delete
27

2951.  

Unless the context requires otherwise, as used in this
28part, the following terms mean the following:

29(a) “Authority” means the Salton Sea Authority, a joint powers
30authority comprised of the County of Imperial, the County of
31Riverside, the Imperial Irrigation District, the Coachella Valley
32Water District, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian
33Tribe.

34(b) “County” means either of the following:

35(1) The County of Riverside.

36(2) The County of Imperial.

37(c) “Quantification Settlement Agreement” has the same
38 meaning as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Chapter 617
39of the Statutes of 2002.

P6    1(d) “Salton Sea Dust Mitigation Project” or “project” means a
2project to monitor and mitigate dust pollution created at the Salton
3Sea as a result of the Quantification Settlement Agreement.

4(e) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Natural Resources
5Agency.

6(f) “State board” means the State Air Resources Board.

7(g) “Valley” means either of the following:

8(1) The Imperial Valley.

9(2) The Coachella Valley.

10

2952.  

(a) Upon the execution of an agreement with the Imperial
11Air Quality Management District and the South Coast Air Quality
12Management District, and for purposes of providing the necessary
13funding, the secretary, in consultation and coordination with the
14state board and the authority, shall develop a strategic plan to guide
15the implementation of the Salton Sea Dust Mitigation Project. The
16strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following
17elements:

18(1) Quantification of current and projected exposed sea lake
19bed arising from the Quantification Settlement Agreement.

20(2) Quantification of current and projected exposed sea lake
21bed arising from factors other than the Quantification Settlement
22Agreement.

23(3) Profile of Salton Sea lake bed aerosols, given chemicals that
24have historically drained into the sea from both agricultural runoff
25and water coming from Mexico over the New River, including
26Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethan or “DDT.”

27(4) Prioritization of mitigation measures that can be instituted
28at the sea to enable both valleys to meet National Ambient Air
29Quality Standards for particulate matter.

30(5) Identification and prioritization of funding streams that can
31be accessed or developed for purposes of paying for dust mitigation
32measures at the sea, including an analysis of how to best monetize
33the renewable energy generating potential of the Salton Sea.

34(b)  To the extent permitted by law, the secretary, in consultation
35and coordination with the state board and the authority, may work
36with appropriate binational, federal, state, local, and
37nongovernmental organizations on both sides of the
38California-Mexico border to develop the strategic plan.

39(c) (1) To further the objectives of this part, the secretary, in
40consultation and coordination with the state board and the authority,
P7    1may convene and oversee a technical advisory committee. The
2advisory committee shall advise the council regarding the necessary
3studies and activities to carry out the project, and shall serve at the
4pleasure of the council. The advisory committee shall include
5representatives from the following:

6(A) Impacted cities and counties.

7(B) Relevant local, regional, and state agencies and departments.

8(C) Nongovernmental organizations.

9(D) Other stakeholders deemed necessary by the secretary, in
10consultation and coordination with the state board and the authority.

11(2) The secretary, in consultation and coordination with the state
12board and the authority, shall appoint the chair of the committee
13and may expand the membership and expertise of the committee
14as it deems necessary.

15(d) The secretary, in consultation and coordination with the state
16board and the authority, may enter into an agreement, including
17an interagency agreement and memorandum of understanding,
18with public agencies, including the county, to accept, manage, and
19expend funds for the implementation of this section.

20(e) This section does not modify existing roles, responsibilities,
21or liabilities of the State of California, the County of Imperial, the
22County of Riverside, or any other governmental agency, under the
23Quantification Settlement Agreement.

24(f) The Salton Sea Dust Mitigation Project Account is hereby
25created in the Salton Sea Restoration Fund to receive moneys for
26activities related to the Salton Sea Dust Mitigation Project from
27sources identified in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) and other
28sources. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the
29account shall be expended to mitigate dust pollution arising from
30the implementation of the Quantification Settlement Agreement.



O

    98