BILL NUMBER: AB 2223 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 19, 2010 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 5, 2010 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Nava FEBRUARY 18, 2010 An act to add Section 3004.7 to the Fish and Game Code, relating to wildlife. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2223, as amended, Nava. Wildlife management areas: nontoxic shot. The Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act requires the use of nonlead centerfire rifle and pistol ammunition when taking big game and coyote within specified areas. Existing law generally provides that a violation of the fish and game laws is a crime. This bill , commencing July 1, 2011, would prohibit the possession or use of any shotgun shell loaded with anything other than nontoxic shot, as defined, when taking migratory game birds, resident small game, or nongame species under the authority of a hunting license within a wildlife management area, as defined. Under the bill, a person who violates that
requirementprohibition would be guilty of an infraction punishable by a $500 fine for the first offense. Because the act would create a new crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. (a) California's system of wildlife management areas, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 1504 of the Fish and Game Code, protectprotects over 627,000 acres of the state's most important wildlife habitat and hosthosts many species that are listed as threatened, endangered, or fully protected under state law. Wildlife management areas are virtual islands of habitat that serve as magnets to wildlife and human visitors with excellent wildlife viewing, and fishing and hunting opportunities. (b) Wildlife management areas should be managed in accordance with the highest standards of wildlife management. (c) Nationally, lead poisoning of waterfowl and the Bald Eagle resulted in a 1991 federal ban on the use of lead shot in all waterfowl and coot hunting areas, including state wildlife management areas. (d) Twenty-five states have lead shot prohibitions for hunting beyond those required by the federal government for waterfowl. (e) Lead poisoning has been observed in 37 species of birds beyond waterfowl with adverse impacts on mourning doves being especially acute. (f) Hunting is a valued tradition in California and hunters play a critical role in wildlife management and conservation, particularly in funding for wildlife conservation generated through license sales and excise taxes on sporting equipment. (g) California's fish and wildlife resources are held in trust for the common good of all the people of California. (h) Allowing the continued use of lead shot ammunition currently used in hunting small game and game birds in wildlife management areas is inconsistent with best practices for such management. (i) It is, therefore, the intent of the Legislature to eliminate the use of lead shot for the purposes of shooting or hunting in wildlife management areas. SEC. 2. Section 3004.7 is added to the Fish and Game Code, to read: 3004.7. (a) As used in this section: (1) "Nontoxic shot" means the types of shot approved by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service for hunting waterfowl and coots. (2) "Wildlife management area" means a waterfowl management area, deer range, upland game bird management area, or public shooting ground. (b) A person shall not possess or use any shotgun shell loaded with anything other than nontoxic shot when taking migratory game birds, resident small game, or nongame species under the authority of a hunting license within a wildlife management area. (c) A person who violates this section is guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine of five hundred dollars ($500). A second or subsequent offense shall be punishable by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more than five thousand dollars ($5,000). (d) This section shall become operative on July 1, 2011. SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.