BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 909| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 909 Author: Hill (D) Amended: 8/3/10 in Senate Vote: 21 PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM : 6-1, 6/22/10 AYES: Lowenthal, Huff, Ashburn, DeSaulnier, Harman, Pavley NOES: Simitian NO VOTE RECORDED: Kehoe, Oropeza SUBJECT : Vehicles: right turn violations: penalties SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill clarifies that turning right on a red light without stopping is a violation punishable by a base fine of $35. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/3/10 remove a reference in a provision of law defining one type of red light violation in order to further distinguish the different types of red light violations and remove any potential ambiguity about which fine should apply to which violation. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1.Section 21453(a) of the Vehicle Code requires a driver facing a steady circular red signal alone to stop, as CONTINUED AB 909 Page 2 specified, and remain stopped until an indication to proceed is shown, except as provided in Section 21453(b) of the Vehicle Code. Violating this provision carries a base fine of $100. 2.Section 21453(b) of the Vehicle Code allows a driver facing a steady circular red signal, after stopping (as prescribed above), to turn right, or turn left from a one-way street onto a one-way street, providing the driver yields as specified. Violating this provision carries a base fine of $35. This bill clarifies that turning right on a red light without stopping is a violation punishable by a base fine of $35, as prescribed in Section 21453(b) rather than a $100 fine as prescribed in Section 21453(a). Comments As the use of photo enforcement increased, it became evident that many violations captured using red light cameras were for right-turn violations and that the resulting base fines were typically $100 instead of $35. Upon further investigation it was discovered that law enforcement distinguishes, and cites for, two types of right-turn violations. The first type of right-turn violation occurs when a driver comes to a complete stop and then proceeds to make a right turn that is unsafe. Law enforcement cites this violation using the lower fine amount. The second violation occurs when a driver approaches an intersection and turns right without coming to a complete stop (i.e., "California stop"). Because the driver never comes to a complete stop, law enforcement cites this violation as a failure to stop, which is assessed the $100 fine. Because law enforcement cites these two types of right-turn violations differently, the bill distinguishes the two types of right-turn violations and exempts turning right on red without stopping from the fine increase imposed by AB 1191 (Shelley), Chapter 852, Statutes of 1997. The consequences of the fine increase have recently gained attention because of the proliferation of red light cameras and the resulting increase in citations for red light CONTINUED AB 909 Page 3 running. Reports have shown that at many intersections where red light cameras are employed, most of the tickets are for right-turn-on-red violations. At one intersection in South San Francisco, 98 percent of the 672 red-light violations processed in a two-month period were for right-turn-on-red violations. While turning right-on-red represents the majority of red light violations, data provided by the author suggest that turning right on red results in fewer collisions than running straight through an intersection or turning left on red. Nationwide, 762 people were killed and an estimated 137,000 injured in crashes involving red-light running in 2008, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, but only 10 percent of those collisions involved drivers turning right without stopping. The report went on to state, "The San Mateo County Superior Court system has become overwhelmed with citizens challenging the $446 citation. The number of citations that the Superior Court must adjudicate from red light cameras has increased significantly [by 80 percent] from 2008 to 2009." By distinguishing the two types of right-turn violations and exempting right-turns without stopping from the $100 fine, this bill reduces the fine for the majority of less serious red light violations, upholds the intent of AB 1191, and ensures that the punishment fits the crime. Total bail amounts . Penalty assessments and court fees are added to base fines that result in a total bail that is significantly higher than the base fine. The total bail amounts for each of the base fines relevant to this bill are identified below: Base Fine Penalty Assessments Court Fees Total $35 $111 $65 $211 $100 $280 $65 $445 FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No CONTINUED AB 909 Page 4 SUPPORT : (Verified 8/10/10) California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union California Teamsters Public Affairs Council National Motorists Association California State Automobile Association Automobile Club of Southern California OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/10/10) California Police Chiefs Association League of California Cities California State Sheriffs' Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, the bill corrects a drafting error made by AB 1191 (Shelley), Chapter 852, Statutes of 1997, which inadvertently increased the base fine for turning right on red without stopping. AB 1191 increased the base fine for red light violations from $35 to $100, but expressly exempted from the increase right-hand turns. The intent of increasing the fine was simply to discourage red light running as it presents a high risk of collision and to ensure that the penalty assigned to a violation reflects the seriousness of the offense. Right turns on red were exempted from the increase because these violations are considered less dangerous than proceeding straight through an intersection or turning left while a light is red. The author's office contends that lowering the fine amount also has the potential to reduce the unintended consequence red light cameras are having on local courts. In a recent report, a San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury found that, "the fine for failure to stop before making a right hand turn seems out of proportion to similar offenses and as a result is often appealed to the traffic court." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : The League of California Cities opposes this bill, "because it will hamper cities' ability to use automated traffic enforcement systems and potentially cost the state millions of dollars each year in lost revenue." The League further states, "Framed as a CONTINUED AB 909 Page 5 simple technical clean-up, this bill would reduce the base fine, the local government share, for failure to stop violations when making a right turn on a red light from $100 to $35 dollars. The states' authority to levy penalty assessments, which total roughly $200 dollars, would be not changed. "The base fine reduction is a direct hit to local jurisdictions but the consequences also hurt the state. With fewer systems in operation there are fewer citations for the state to levy their penalty assessments, which means less revenue is generated for court operations, construction, security, and Department of Justice programs. The Department of Finance estimates that if red light cameras cease to operate the state, courts, and local agencies would lose tens of millions of dollars." JJA:nl 8/11/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED