BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 17, 2008

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                              Mervyn M. Dymally, Chair
                   SB 1147 (Calderon) - As Amended:  April 9, 2008

           SENATE VOTE  :   27-13
           
          SUBJECT  :   Medi-Cal:  eligibility:  juvenile offenders.

           SUMMARY  :   Prohibit the termination of Medi-Cal eligibility of a  
          child under age 21 because of the child's status as an inmate,  
          and requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to  
          establish the protocols and procedures necessary to ensure  
          Medi-Cal eligibility is not terminated.  Specifically,  this  
          bill :

          1)Prohibits inmate status from being used to terminate the  
            Medi-Cal eligibility of a child under age 21, as defined in a  
            specified regulation.

          2)Requires, commencing January 1, 2009, the DHCS, in  
            consultation with the Chief Probation Officers of California  
            (CPOC) and the County Welfare Directors Association (CWDA), to  
            establish the protocols and procedures necessary to ensure  
            both of the following: 

             a)   Medi-Cal eligibility is not terminated in violation of  
               #1) above; and,
             b)   Claims for Medicaid-covered health care services for any  
               individual who is an inmate of an institution are made only  
               when federal financial participation (FFP) is available.

          3)Requires DHCS to implement the above provisions by means of  
            all-county letters or similar instructions, without taking any  
            further regulatory action.  Requires, by January 1, 2011, DHCS  
            to adopt regulations, as necessary, to implement the  
            provisions in #1) and #2) above in accordance with the  
            Administrative Procedure Act.

          4)Requires DHCS, no later than July 1, 2009, in consultation  
            with stakeholders, including, but not limited to, county  
            probation departments, county human services agencies, and  
            consumer advocates, to develop a model notification letter for  
            use by juvenile detention facilities which meets the existing  








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  2

            requirement that county juvenile detention facilities notify  
            the parent or guardian of a ward (a ward is a person in the  
            custody of a juvenile detention facility) of the facility's  
            intention to provide the county welfare department with the  
            ward's name, release date, any information regarding the  
            ward's Medi-Cal status prior to disposition, and sufficient  
            information when available for the county to begin the  
            Medi-Cal eligibility determination process.

          5)Limits the requirement that county welfare departments  
            initiate a Medi-Cal application to wards that are not already  
            enrolled in the Medi-Cal program, when a county has received  
            information on a ward from a county juvenile detention  
            facility.

          6)Requires county welfare departments to deny a minor's Medi-Cal  
            application in accordance with due process requirements if the  
            minor's parent or guardian fails to cooperate in completing  
            the application.

          7)Requires DHCS, after the development and dissemination of the  
            model notification letter established pursuant to #4) above,  
            to convene a workgroup by January 1, 2010 for the purpose of  
            reviewing the implementation of existing law requirements  
            relating to wards and Medi-Cal, and the changes made by this  
            bill, and to make recommendations, if appropriate, to increase  
            the rate of successful Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and  
            minimize county administrative burden.  The workgroup must  
            consider, at a minimum, whether to recommend an opt-in, rather  
            than an opt-out, process for parents of wards who are minors.

          8)Requires the workgroup in #7) above to include representatives  
            of CPOC, CWDA, legislative staff, and consumer advocates.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by DHCS, which  
            provides comprehensive health benefits to low-income children,  
            their parents or caretaker relatives, pregnant women, elderly,  
            blind or disabled persons, nursing home residents, and  
            refugees who meet specified eligibility criteria.  Medi-Cal  
            family income eligibility for children ages 0 to 1 extends up  
            to 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), children ages 1 to  
            5 with family incomes up to 133% FPL, and children ages 6 to  
            19 with family incomes up to 100% FPL.








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  3


          2)Establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program  
            but excludes from the definition of "health care services,"  
            care or services for any individual who is an inmate of an  
            institution (except as a patient in a medical institution),  
            except to the extent permitted by federal law.

          3)Requires county juvenile detention facilities, following the  
            issuance of an order of the juvenile court committing a county  
            ward to a juvenile hall, camp, or ranch for 30 days or longer,  
            to provide the appropriate county welfare department with the  
            ward's name, scheduled or actual release date, any known  
            information regarding the ward's Medi-Cal status prior to  
            disposition, and sufficient information, when available, for  
            the county welfare department to begin the process of  
            determining the ward's Medi-Cal eligibility, including, if the  
            ward is a minor, contact information for the ward's parent or  
            guardian, if available.

          4)Requires, if the ward is a minor, prior to providing  
            information to the county welfare department pursuant to #3)  
            above, the county juvenile detention facility to notify the  
            parent or guardian of its intention to submit the information  
            required by #3) above to the county welfare department.  The  
            parent or guardian must be given a reasonable time to opt out  
            of the Medi-Cal eligibility determination.

          5)Requires the county welfare department, upon receipt of the  
            information in #3) above and pursuant to the protocols and  
            procedures developed, to initiate an application and determine  
            the individual's eligibility for Medi-Cal benefits.  The  
            county welfare department, if the ward is a minor, must  
            promptly contact the parent or guardian to arrange for  
            completion of the application. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, on-going increased Medi-Cal benefit costs of $50,000  
          General Fund (GF), one-time increased computer-related  
          reprogramming costs of $85,000 GF, and one-time increased costs  
          to convene a workgroup of $25,000.  On-going savings of $43,000  
          (GF) by eliminating the Medi-Cal eligibility redetermination  
          cost for 350 minors.

           COMMENTS  :   









                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  4

           1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL  .   The author states this bill prohibits  
            inmate status from being used to terminate the eligibility of  
            a child under the Medi-Cal program and requires DHCS to  
            develop protocols and policies to ensure that a juvenile  
            beneficiary's eligibility for Medi-Cal is not terminated if  
            inmate status is the reason for the termination.

          When a juvenile Medi-Cal enrollee is admitted to a locked state  
            or county facility, they lose their eligibility to participate  
            in the Medi-Cal program.  Because their eligibility is  
            terminated, the juvenile must re-apply for Medi-Cal upon  
            release.  Under state law, Medi-Cal applications may take 45  
            days for processing, and in reality may take much longer.   
            This can result in extended gaps in treatment and access to  
            needed medications.  Because many juvenile wards suffer from  
            physical and mental illnesses, the author argues the existing  
            termination requirements are dangerous to the juvenile,  
            difficult for caregivers, and costly to the community.   
            According to the author, this bill ensures that California  
            complies with a federal recommendation that juvenile inmates  
            not lose their Medi-Cal eligibility simply because they have  
            been an inmate in a county-run facility

           2)BACKGROUND  .   State Medi-Cal regulations make individuals who  
            are inmates of public institutions ineligible for Medi-Cal.   
            However, a 1997 letter from the federal Department of Health  
            and Human Services indicates FFP is available through Medicaid  
            when an inmate becomes a patient in a medical institution on  
            an inpatient basis.  Additionally, a 2004 letter to State  
            Medicaid directors from the federal Centers for Medicare and  
            Medicaid Services (CMS) encourages states to "suspend" and not  
            "terminate" benefits while a person is in a public institution  
            or Institute for Mental Disease, noting the payment exclusion  
            (known as the "inmate exception") under Medicaid does not  
            affect the eligibility of an individual for the Medicaid  
            program.

          CMS indicated that individuals who meet the requirements for  
            eligibility for Medicaid may be enrolled in the program  
            before, during, and after the time in which they are held      
            involuntarily in secure custody.  CMS recommends the state  
            establish a process under which an eligible inmate or resident  
            is placed in a suspended status so that the state does not  
            claim FFP for services the individual receives, but the person  
            remains on the state's rolls as being eligible for Medicaid  








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  5

            (assuming the person continues to meet all applicable  
            eligibility requirements).  Once discharge from the facility  
            is anticipated, CMS indicates the state should take whatever  
            steps are necessary to ensure that an eligible individual is  
            placed in payment status so that he or she can begin receiving  
            Medicaid-covered services immediately upon leaving the  
            facility.  If an individual is not already eligible for  
            Medicaid prior to discharge from the facility, but has filed  
            an application for Medicaid, CMS suggests the state should  
            take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that the  
            application is processed in a timely manner so that the  
            individual can receive Medicaid-covered services upon  
            discharge from the facility. 

           3)LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE  .   A letter from the Legislative  
            Analyst's Office (LAO) to the author on the potential costs  
            and savings associated with this bill indicates the parents or  
            guardians of Medi-Cal enrolled youth who enter a juvenile  
            hall, county probation camp or ranch are responsible for  
            notifying the county eligibility office so the county can  
            disenroll the child from Medi-Cal.  The LAO indicates it is  
            uncertain how often disenrollment occurs because county  
            eligibility offices may not know when a child is incarcerated  
            and parents have little incentive to report because many of  
            these parents likely receive Medi-Cal through their children  
            and would lose their own benefits when their child's  
            disenrollment occurred.  

          The LAO reports DHCS had no data on how many youth are  
            disenrolled from Medi-Cal as a result of entering juvenile  
            hall or a similar facility, although a 2006 analysis of a  
            similar bill estimated that 310 youth were terminated from  
            Medi-Cal because of incarceration.  The state Department of  
            Justice (DOJ) reports, for calendar year 2005, approximately  
            45,000 juveniles were referred for detention, and while some  
            portion of these juveniles were probably Medi-Cal eligible or  
            already enrolled, neither DOJ nor DHCS collect the data that  
            identifies that portion.  

          The LAO indicates savings could occur because suspension of  
            enrollment, instead of disenrollment, would avoid the  
            administrative cost of processing a new application when the  
            youth is released from incarceration, and these reenrollment  
            costs are currently estimated at $190 per application by DHCS.  
             DHCS indicated to the LAO that the cost of programming new  








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  6

            aid codes through the database used to track Medi-Cal  
            recipients (the Medi-Cal Eligibility Determination System)  
            would be approximately $100,000 to $300,000 ($25,000 to  
            $75,000 GF).

           4)SUPPORT  .   This bill is sponsored by the Youth Law Center  
            (YLC) to ensure that eligible young people leaving detention  
            do not have to reapply for Medi-Cal, thereby supporting prompt  
            and continuous access to prescription medication, mental  
            health services and medical treatment.  YLC argues requiring  
            formal terminations of Medi-Cal eligibility and subsequent  
            reapplications is costly and makes little sense for children  
            who may only be in custody for a period of days or weeks.   
            Supporters of this bill argue this measure will improve  
            continuity of care for youth, support rehabilitation,  
            particularly for youth who need mental health services, reduce  
            the cost to the state for delayed medical and mental health  
            care costs, reduce the time and money spent on the Medi-Cal  
            reapplication process, and bring California into compliance  
            with federal guidance.

           5)LAWSUIT  .   A lawsuit (  City and County of San Francisco, County  
            of Santa Clara v. State of California, California Department  
            of Health Care Services, and Does 1 to 10  , Superior Court,  
            County of San Francisco, No. CGC007-468241) filed in San  
            Francisco County in November 2007 is challenging the legality  
            of terminating of terminating wards because of their status as  
            inmates.  That case is currently awaiting trial.

           6)AUTHOR'S AMENDMENT  .   The author intends to offer an amendment  
            to include the definition of "child" as any individual less  
            than 21 years of age, and delete the current reference in this  
            bill to a regulation in Title 22.

           7)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION  .  

             a)   SB 1469 (Cedillo), Chapter 657, Statutes of 2007,  
               requires county juvenile detention facilities, following  
               the issuance of an order of the juvenile court committing a  
               county ward to a juvenile hall, camp, or ranch for 30 days  
               or longer, to provide the county welfare department with  
               the ward's name, his or her scheduled or actual release  
               date, any known information regarding the ward's Medi-Cal  
               status prior to disposition, and sufficient information,  
               when available, for the county welfare department to begin  








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  7

               the process of determining the ward's Medi-Cal eligibility.

             b)   AB 2004 (Yee) of 2006 would have prohibited the use of  
               inmate status to terminate the Medi-Cal eligibility of a  
               minor, and would have required DHCS to suspend the health  
               care benefits, but not terminate the Medi-Cal eligibility  
               of, a minor who is an inmate of an institution.  AB 2004  
               was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.  In his veto  
               message, the Governor stated the bill did not address the  
               need for better coordination between county welfare, county  
               probation, and juvenile detention facilities, and he  
               expressed concern that suspension of Medi-Cal eligibility  
               would require costly automation changes, be  
               administratively complex and may lead to increased fraud or  
               abuse.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Youth Law Center (sponsor)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees,  
          AFL-CIO
          California Mental Health Directors Association
          California Psychological Association
          California State Association of Counties
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Chief Probation Officers of California
          City and County of San Francisco
          Commonweal - The Juvenile Justice Program
          County of Santa Barbara
          County Welfare Directors Association
          Fight Crime:  Invest in Kids California
          Humboldt County Probation Department
          Lambda Letters Project
          Los Angeles County Office of Education
          Protection & Advocacy, Inc.
          Regional Council of Rural Counties
          Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors
          Urban Counties Caucus
          Ventura County Board of Supervisors
          Western Center on Law & Poverty

           Opposition 
           








                                                                  SB 1147
                                                                  Page  8

          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Scott Bain / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097