BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2262
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 16, 2008

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mark Leno, Chair

               AB 2262 (Torrico) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2008  

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  5-1
                        Judiciary                                    10-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill extends, from 72 hours to 7 days, the age at which a  
          child may be left at a designated safe-surrender site. This bill  
          also:

          1)Adds a local fire agency, upon the approval of the appropriate  
            local governing body of the agency, to the designated  
            safe-surrender sites. (Current sites are either designated by  
            boards of supervisors, or are locations within a hospital, as  
            designated by the hospital.) 

          2)Provides that a safe-surrender site, and the personnel of a  
            safe-surrender site, are not liable for a surrendered child  
            prior to taking actual physical custody of the child. 

          3)Appropriates $5,000,000 (GF) for a safe-surrender public  
            awareness campaign and a toll-free safe surrender education  
            and assistance number.  

          4)Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to report to  
            the Legislature by January 2012 regarding the effect of the  
            safe surrender act, including specified statistics.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Appropriates $5 million (GF) to DSS for a safe-surrender  
            public awareness campaign and for a toll-free phone number for  
            public education and assistance.  

          2)One-time GF reporting costs to DSS in the range of $150,000.








                                                                  AB 2262
                                                                  Page  2


          3)Minor, potentially state-reimbursable costs for local entities  
            and governments to consult regarding the designation of  
            safe-surrender sites. 

           COMMENT

          1)Rationale.  The author contends the safe-surrender law should  
            be expanded and advertised, as since December 2007, some 220  
            babies have been safely surrendered in California since the  
            advent of this law in 2001 and an additional 147 have been  
            discovered alive following illegal abandonment.   

            According to the author, "The anonymity, confidentiality and  
            freedom from prosecution may encourage parents to leave their  
            child at a safely surrender site. Factors such as post partum  
            depression, other mental health issues, language barriers and  
            lack of public awareness may prevent a woman from being able  
            to make a decision so quickly after having a baby. 

            "Extending the date from the current 72 hour provision to 30  
            days may save the lives of more babies in California."
                
          2)Current law  , established by SB 1368 (Brulte, 2000), provides  
            for the surrender of a newborn by a parent or other  
            responsible person to a safe-surrender site. SB 1368 was  
            intended to provide mothers of unwanted newborns a safe  
            alternative to abandoning infants in places where babies would  
            likely die. SB 1368 designated safe places (such as an  
            emergency room of a hospital) where a person can surrender a  
            baby, with no questions asked, and retrieve the baby within a   
            14-day period, as specified, with immunity from criminal  
            penalties under child abandonment laws. 

            According to a January 2005 DSS report on the safe-surrender  
            law, which acknowledges the difficulty of obtaining accurate  
            figures, 64 infants were safely surrendered in 2001-2004. Of  
            the 64 referenced in the DSS report, 55 were less than  
            one-day-old and nine were two or three-days-old. Fifty-two  
            showed no signs of abuse or neglect, and 10 tested  
            drug-positive. In only one case did a parent attempt to  
            reclaim an infant. (That parent did not pursue the effort  
            after an initial query.) 

           3)Support  . The American College of Obstetricians and  








                                                                  AB 2262
                                                                  Page  3

            Gynecologists of California state, "Expansion of the time  
            frame from 72 hours to 7 days in which parents can safely  
            surrender their newborns may not significantly increase the  
            numbers of newborns protected under this program, but if even  
            a few lives can be saved, we think the program expansion  
            appropriate. In addition to saving newborns, it saves the  
            birth parents from a lifetime of guilt and criminal penalty if  
            they were to otherwise abandon their child in the midst of an  
            almost unfathomable panic." 

           4)Opposition  . According to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors,  
            "Los Angeles County has been at the forefront of implementing  
            the Safe Surrender Law, with over 60 babies safely surrendered  
            since its enactment in 2002. The County has had four newborns  
            safely surrendered since January 2008. While the County  
            remains committed to the safety and well-being of newborns, it  
            believes that the current law regarding the 72-hour age  
            limitation is appropriate, and that is should not be expanded.  
            The concept behind this law is to protect newborns by allowing  
            their birth mothers to surrender the baby at a designated,  
            safe location rather than abandoning the infant in an unsafe  
            environment, which could result in the baby's death." 

           5)Other States  . According to a March 2007 policy brief by the  
            Guttmacher Instititute - a nonprofit organization focused on  
            sexual and reproductive health research, policy analysis and  
            public education - 47 states have legalized relinquishment (30  
            of which authorize anonymous relinquishment and legal  
            immunity, while others request medical information and/or  
            investigate  missing child status): 16 for 72 hours; 11 for  
            three days to  two weeks; 14 for 28 to 31 days: five for 45 to  
            90 days, and  two (North Dakota and Missouri) for one year.     
             




















                                                                  AB 2262
                                                                  Page  4

           6)Similar legislation  .

             a)   AB 81 (Torrico), 2007, similar to this bill (absent the  
               $5 million appropriation, which was deleted by this  
               committee), was vetoed. The governor stated, "The current  
               72-hour period contained in law allows for a  
               no-questions-asked safe surrender of a newborn, and is  
               supported by research and statistics which indicate that  
               most neonaticide occurs within the first day. Experts have  
               raised concerns that instead of improving child safety,  
               increasing the time that a baby may be surrendered from 72  
               hours will put newborns in greater risk by keeping them in  
               an unsafe environment without proper care and supervision."

             b)   AB 1873 (Torrico), 2006, similar to this bill (absent  
               the $5 million appropriation, which was deleted by this  
               committee), but with a 30-day window, was vetoed with a  
               similar veto message.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081