BILL ANALYSIS AB 645 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 645 (Feuer) As Amended June 28, 2007 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |74-0 |(May 3, 2007) |SENATE: |36-0 |(July 16, | | | | | | |2007) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: TRANS. SUMMARY : Prohibits an individual that is convicted of a 2 point violation from attending traffic school and permits court discretion in expunging convictions of these violations from an individual's record. The Senate amendments : 1)Prohibit an individual that is convicted of a 2 point violation from attending traffic school and permit court discretion in expunging convictions of these violations from an individual's record. 2)Provide that if a defendant who was convicted of a 2 point violation, petitions the court, the court in its discretion and in the interests of justice, may order the relief provided. EXISTING LAW : 1)Permits a court to order or allow a person convicted of a traffic violation to attend a traffic violator school, a licensed driving school, or any other court-approved program or driving instruction. After attendance, the court may dismiss the compliant. 2)Provides a procedure for defendants who have fulfilled the conditions of their probation to have a conviction dismissed and expunged from their Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) record. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill prohibited an individual that has committed a hit and run, driving under the influence, or reckless driving violation from attending traffic school and AB 645 Page 2 permitted court discretion in expunging convictions of these violations from an individual's record. FISCAL EFFECT : No direct fiscal effect. There may be minor statewide local court costs resulting from more moving violations going to trial instead of being expunged but these costs would not be reimbursable from the state. COMMENTS : According to the author, ticket masking is a practice of allowing drivers to attend traffic school in order to have certain violations removed from their DMV record. The author adds that in 2004, 773 serious 2-point violations, including drunk driving, reckless driving, and hit-and-run accidents were expunged. Thus, the author suggests, drivers that would otherwise receive enough violation points to have their license suspended as a negligent operator may continue to drive with no negative consequences and be more likely to cause a subsequent accident. In 2004, there were over 31,000 alcohol-involved injuries and 1,462 alcohol-involved fatalities. Typically, DMV attaches points to a driver's record for moving violations. If a driver gets four points on their record in any 12-month period (or six points in 24-months), DMV can suspend their individuals' license. In addition to the safety concerns this bill intends to target, the author suggest that masking of these violations does not allow insurance companies to truly gauge their clients' driving records. Consequently, many drivers are able to qualify for a "good driver discount," despite having been convicted of multiple violations. The Pacific Association of Domestic Insurance Companies states that in order to accurately assess the risk and properly price the product, it is necessary that insurance companies receive all current and accurate information that may affect one's driving record. This bill would also provide greater discretion by the courts to dismiss or expunge from an individual record a conviction of a hit and run, driving under the influence, or reckless driving. By providing greater court discretion, a judge would be able to punish the worst offenders by not allowing them to continuously clear their records and have their behavior remain unchanged. Analysis Prepared by : Alejandro Esparza / TRANS. / (916) AB 645 Page 3 319-2093 FN: 0001934