BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1037
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1037 (Kehoe)
          As Amended  August 15, 2005
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :26-14  
          
           UTLITIES AND COMMERCE           7-3                 NATURAL  
          RESOURCES                7-2                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Levine, Baca, Blakelsee,  |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |
          |     |Calderon, Jerome Horton,  |     |Calderon, Laird, Klehs,   |
          |     |Montanez,                 |     |Leno, Nation, Levine,     |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas             |     |Saldana, Yee, Mullin      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Bogh, Keene, Wyland       |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |
          |     |                          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |
          |     |                          |     |Walters                   |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Laird, Klehs,   |     |                          |
          |     |Leno, Nation, Levine,     |     |                          |
          |     |Saldana, Yee, Mullin      |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |     |                          |
          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |     |                          |
          |     |Walters                   |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Requires electric utilities, municipal utilities  
          (munis), and the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to make  
          energy efficiency programs a priority before acquiring other  
          sources of electricity or building new transmission lines.   
          Specifically,  this bill  requires:  

          1)PUC to require gas and electric utilities, in procuring  
            energy, to first acquire all available energy efficiency and  








                                                                  SB 1037
                                                                  Page  2


            demand reduction  recourses that are cost-effective, reliable,  
            and feasible (before conventional generation or other  
            resources), as specified.

          2)PUC, in considering an application for a certificate of public  
            convenience and necessity for an electric transmission line,  
            to consider all cost-effective alternatives that would meet  
            the need, as specified.

          3)Munis, in procuring energy, to first acquire all available  
            energy efficiency and demand reduction  recourses that are  
            cost-effective, reliable, and feasible  (before conventional  
            generation or other resources), as specified.

          4)Munis to annually report to its customers and to the  
            California Energy Commission (CEC) its investments in energy  
            efficiency and demand reduction programs.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes and funds various energy efficiency programs for  
            public and private electric and gas utilities.

          2)Requires each investor-owned electric utility to purchase  
            energy according to a procurement plan, subject to PUC  
            approval.


           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor absorbable costs to the PUC and the CEC.

           COMMENTS  :  The purpose of this bill is to codify recent PUC  
          decisions requiring electricity companies to make energy  
          efficiency measures their first priority in planning to meet new  
          demands. 

          California's energy agencies, including PUC, have adopted an  
          "Energy Action Plan" (EAP) which includes a "loading order" for  
          the acquisition of new resources.  The loading order prioritizes  
          energy efficiency by stating that energy needs should first be  
          met by energy efficiency and demand reduction programs before a  
          utility procures new electricity from renewable resources or  
          fossil fuel fired generating facilities.  Energy efficiency  
          measures are considered some of the most cost effective ways of  








                                                                  SB 1037
                                                                  Page  3


          meeting California's growing energy needs, since it is generally  
          less expensive to conserve electricity than it is to build new  
          power plants to meet demand. 

          EAP and its loading order have no force of law and merely state  
          the planning preferences of the state's energy agencies.   
          However, elements of EAP, including the loading order, have been  
          incorporated into PUC decisions governing the privately-owned  
          utilities it regulates.  EAP has not been adopted by, and is not  
          directly enforceable upon, publicly-owned utilities.   
          Publicly-owned utilities are subject to state law, but are not  
          subject to PUC jurisdiction.  Instead, they are public agencies  
          governed by local elected officials.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0012254