BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 911
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 13, 2005

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                               Lloyd E. Levine, Chair
                  SB 911 (Dunn) - As Introduced:  February 22, 2005

           SENATE VOTE  :   36-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   Telecommunications:9-1-1 system.

           SUMMARY  :  Allows a wireless 911 call to be answered by a public  
          safety agency other than the California Highway Patrol (CHP) if  
          the call originates from a location other than a freeway.

           EXISTING LAW  requires most emergency 911 telephone calls made  
          from cell phones to be answered by the CHP.  An alternative  
          public safety agency (e.g. a local police department) can answer  
          the call if the call originates from a location other than a  
          highway or county road under the CHP's jurisdiction, provided  
          that the CHP, the Department of General Services, and the  
          alternative public safety agency all agree that to do so would  
          be in the public interest.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author's office the intent of this  
          bill is to allow county 911 services to have 911 calls from  
          wireless phones routed directly to them if the call originates  
          from within their jurisdiction, instead of having the call  
          initially directed to the CHP.  Current law allows for direct  
          routing of cell phone calls to city run 911 services, but not to  
          county run services.

          1)  Background  : Since 1984, when wireless telephone service was  
          introduced, all 911 calls from cellular telephones have been  
          answered by the CHP.  At that time a cell phone caller could not  
          be automatically located, so the presumption was made that the  
          caller was calling from the freeway, which is the CHP's  
          jurisdiction.  If the call instead came from a location which  
          was not the CHP's jurisdiction, such as on a city street, the  
          CHP would forward the call to the appropriate public safety  
          agency.  The forwarding of calls is problematic for 911 response  
          because it slows the emergency response, the extra handling can  
          cause important information to be dropped (e.g. calling number  
          or caller location), and it creates extra work for the CHP to  








                                                                  SB 911
                                                                  Page  2

          forward the call.  Directly connecting the cell phone 911 call  
          to the responding public safety agency would speed emergency  
          response and eliminate unnecessary work by the CHP.

          Technological advancements now make it possible to locate the  
          precise location of wireless phone user dialing 911.  Federal  
          regulations require cell phone companies and handset  
          manufacturers to implement the technology.  The ability to  
          locate the cellular 911 caller makes it possible to directly  
          connect the call to the public safety agency responsible for the  
          emergency response.  

          In 1999, when wireless companies were first implementing the  
          location identification technology, legislation authorized  
          wireless 911 calls to be routed directly to local public safety  
          agencies (AB 1263 (Thomson), Chapter 981, Statutes of 2000).   
          This direct local routing was permitted only if the call came  
          from an area that was not within the CHP's jurisdiction and if  
          the CHP, the local public safety agency, and the Department of  
          General Services, all agreed that to do so would be in the  
          public interest.  AB 1263 however, has been interpreted to allow  
          for the routing of wireless calls made from within a city's  
          jurisdiction to that city's emergency response center, but not  
          to allow the routing to calls from unincorporated areas to the  
          county's emergency response center. This bill will clarify that  
          a call from an unincorporated area may be relayed directly to  
          the county's emergency response center and not to the CHP. 


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Alameda County Sheriff's Department
          Calaveras County Sheriff's Department
          California Fire Chiefs Association
          Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department
          El Dorado County Sheriff's Department
          Fire Districts Association
          Imperial County Sheriff's Department
          Kern County Sheriff's Department
          Kings County Sheriff's Department
          Marin County Sheriff's Department
          Merced County Sheriff's Department
          Plumas County Sheriff's Department








                                                                  SB 911
                                                                  Page  3

          San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
          San Diego County Sheriff's Department
          Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department
          Shasta County Sheriff's Department
          Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department
          Tuolumne County Sheriff's Department
          Yuba County Sheriff's Department
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083