BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 9, 2006  

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                   Judy Chu, Chair

                   SB 757 (Kehoe) - As Amended:  February 27, 2006 

          Policy Committee:                             Transportation  
          Vote:        8-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires, among other several other things, state  
          agencies to take every cost-effective and technologically  
          feasible action needed to reduce the growth of petroleum  
          consumption and to increase transportation energy conservation  
          and efficiency and the use of alternative fuels in California.  

           FISCAL EFFECT
           
          1)Moderate total ongoing costs, in the range of $300,000  
            starting in 2006-07, to all state agencies combined to  
            integrate transportation energy goals into their adoption of  
            rules and regulations.  (GF and several special funds.)

          2)Minor ongoing costs, probably less than $150,000 annually  
            starting in 2006-07, to the Air Resources Board (ARB), to  
            consider alternative fuel vehicle programs and advanced  
            transportation technology when adopting air pollution rules  
            and regulations applicable to motor vehicles.  (GF or Air  
            Pollution Control Fund (APCF)).)

          3)Minor ongoing costs, perhaps $80,000 annually starting in  
            2007-08, to CalEPA to assess oil refinery pollution  
            violations.  (GF or APCF.)

          4)Minor ongoing costs, about $100,000 annually starting in  
            2006-07, to the California Energy Commission (CEC) to expand  
            its reporting, monitoring and analysis of oil market pricing  
            and supply.  (Energy Resources Programs Account.)

          5)Minor one-time costs, probably less than $50,000 in 2006-07,  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page  2

            to the Business, Transportation and Housing (BT&H) Agency to  
            make recommendations on alternative revenue sources to gas and  
            diesel fuel taxes.  (GF or Motor Vehicle Account.)

           SUMMARY CONTINUED
           
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires state agencies to consider the state's transportation  
            energy goals in adopting rules and regulations, including the  
            recommendations of the CEC in the most-recently adopted  
            Integrated Energy Policy Report.

          2)Requires the ARB, when the board adopts rules and regulations  
            to reduce air pollution and toxic air contaminants from motor  
            vehicles, to consider requirements, incentives, and  
            partnerships for publicly administered fleet operators to buy  
            alternative fuel vehicles and install advanced transportation  
            technologies.

          3)Requires the CEC to include, in its oil industry price and  
            supply reporting, monitoring and analysis, trends in world oil  
            demand and to refer to the Attorney General any cases in which  
            the commission determines that there may be market abuse or  
            unfair competition.

          4)Requires CalEPA, starting by January 1, 2008, to annually  
            assess oil refinery pollution violations, the status of these  
            violations, and the technological feasibility and community  
            health benefits of modernizing the state's oil refineries,  
            fuels storage, and fuel transport system.

          5)Requires the Secretary of the BT&H Agency, by March 31, 2008,  
            to recommend, to the governor and the Legislature, alternative  
            revenue sources to supplement or replace lost revenue  
            generated by taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel.

          6)Requires the Secretary of CalEPA to take action intended to  
            influence Congress and the U.S. Department of Transportation  
            to double the combined fuel economy of cars and light trucks  
            by 2020.

           COMMENTS  

           Rationale  .  The author believes the state needs to take  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page  3

          comprehensive and coordinated actions to reduce California's  
          demand for petroleum and to increase the availability of  
          alternative fuels and transportation technologies.  This bill  
          establishes a complex process, primarily involving CalEPA, the  
          ARB, and the CEC, but affecting all state agencies, to identify,  
          encourage, and integrate policies to reduce petroleum  
          consumption, increase alternative fuel consumption, and help  
          make California more petroleum independent.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Steve Archibald / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081