BILL ANALYSIS
SB 441
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB 441 (Soto)
As Amended August 22, 2005
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE : 23-12
UTILITIES AND COMMERCE 8-2
APPROPRIATIONS 10-6
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Levine, Bogh, Baca, |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg, Laird, |
| |Pavley, | |Klehs, Leno, Levine, |
| |De La Torre, Jerome | |Saldana, Yee, Mullin |
| |Horton, Montanez, Jones | | |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Blakeslee, Keene |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson, |
| | | |Haynes, Nakanishi, |
| | | |Nation, Walters |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Prohibits the California Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) from requiring the installation of advanced metering
infrastructure (AMI) unless it first evaluates the effects on
rates, the amount of peak load reduction, and the feasibility.
FISCAL EFFECT : PUC indicates this bill is consistent with
activities currently underway and that any costs associated with
this bill can be absorbed using existing resources.
COMMENTS : According to the author, the purpose of this bill is
to protect ratepayers by ensuring that if PUC adopts
time-differentiated electricity rates for residential or small
commercial customers, it had determined that net-metering is
cost effective.
Analysis Prepared by : Gina Mandy / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083
FN: 0012112