BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Carole Migden, Chairwoman
396 (Battin)
Hearing Date: 5/2/05 Amended: 4/7/05
Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: E, U & C 8-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 396 requires the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) to report to the Legislature, by July 1, 2007, on the
impact of toll call pricing in the Coachella Valley, and whether
additional steps are necessary to encourage innovative pricing,
and related matters.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Fund
PUC $85 over two
years -- Special*
Costs should be
offset by fee revenues.
*Public Utilities' Reimbursement Account (PURA)
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS:
Generally, local toll-free telephone calling areas are limited
to a geographic area of 12 miles. In certain circumstances,
such as where customers cannot reach a reasonable range of
services, i.e., police, fire, schools, etc., the PUC may approve
an Extended Area Service (EAS). An EAS extends the toll-free
geographic area of a community. While it allows certain callers
to avoid paying toll charges, the remaining ratepayers in the
territory absorb the cost of that benefit.
In January 1995, the PUC opened the market for short-distance
toll calls to competition. Because the market is competitive,
the PUC concluded that the public interest would be served by
allowing competitive pressures to offer customers choices for
toll calls, rather than creating new EAS routes.
This bill requires the PUC to determine the impact of toll
pricing in the Coachella Valley and consider whether additional
options, i.e., innovative pricing plans, consumer education
programs, etc. may be necessary to serve the area.
SB 1553 (Battin) of 2002 was similar to this bill and was vetoed
by Governor Davis. In his veto message, the Governor expressed
concerns over costs and a "piecemeal approach" to an issue of
statewide significance.
Increased costs to the PUC are based on one new staff position,
a PURA III, on a limited term basis. PURA revenues are derived
from an annual fee imposed on utilities. Therefore, any
increased costs should be recovered from fee revenues.