BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 204
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 20, 2006

                  ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND REDISTRICTING
                                  Tom Umberg, Chair
                      SB 204 (Bowen) - As Amended:  May 23, 2006

           SENATE VOTE  :   23-14
           
          SUBJECT  :   Public Utilities Commission: State Energy Resources  
          Conservation and Development Commission: commission memberships.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires a commissioner of the California Public  
          Utilities Commission (PUC) to immediately vacate office if he or  
          she voluntarily acquires a financial interest in a corporation  
          or person that the commissioner knows or should have known is  
          subject to regulation by the PUC.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)States that any PUC commissioner who voluntarily acquires a  
            financial interest in a corporation or person that the  
            commissioner knows or should have known is subject to  
            regulation by PUC must immediately vacate his or her office.

          2)Prohibits a person who has received a substantial portion of  
            his or her income directly or indirectly from any person or  
            corporation subject to regulation by the California Energy  
            Commission (CEC) during the previous two years from being a  
            member of the CEC.

          3)Prohibits a member of the CEC from being employed by any  
            person or corporation subject to regulation by the CEC for two  
            years after he or she ceases being a member of the CEC.

          4)Makes numerous conforming and clarifying changes.

          5)Corrects an erroneous cross-reference.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Prohibits a person from being a member of the CEC if that  
            person did either of the following during the two years prior  
            to appointment:

             a)   Received a substantial portion of income directly or  
               indirectly from any electric utility; or









                                                                  SB 204
                                                                  Page  2

             b)   Sold or manufactured any major component of any  
               facility.

          2)Prohibits partners, employers and employees of a member of the  
            CEC from acting as an attorney, agent or employee for any  
            person or entity other than the state in connection with any  
            matter in which the CEC is a party or has a direct and  
            substantial interest.

          3)Provides that any of the above prohibitions shall not apply if  
            the Attorney General (AG) finds that the interest of the  
            member or employee of the CEC is not so substantial as to be  
            deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which  
            the state may expect from the member or employee.

          4)Provides that any person who violates any of the above  
            prohibitions is guilty of a felony.

          5)Prohibits a PUC commissioner from holding a financial interest  
            in a person or corporation that is regulated by the PUC.

          6)Provides that if a PUC commissioner involuntarily acquires a  
            financial interest in a person or corporation that is  
            regulated by the PUC, his or her office shall become vacant  
            unless he or she divests himself or herself of that interest  
            within a reasonable time.

          7)Prohibits any state officer or employee from engaging in any  
            employment, activity, or enterprise, which is clearly  
            inconsistent, incompatible, or in conflict with his or her  
            duties as a state officer or employee.

          8)Prohibits any state or local government public official from  
            participating in or attempting to influence a governmental  
            decision in which he or she knows, or has reason to know, he  
            or she has a financial interest.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.  State-mandated local program;  
          contains a crimes and infractions disclaimer.

           COMMENTS  :

           1)Purpose of the Bill  :  In April 2002, a San Francisco Superior  
            Court judge fined then PUC Commissioner Henry Duque $5,000 and  
            ordered him removed from PUC after finding Duque invested  








                                                                  SB 204
                                                                  Page  3

            $27,000 in Nextel, a mobile phone company that is regulated by  
            PUC.  Commissioner Duque had acquired the stock in 1999  
            believing that Nextel was regulated by the Federal  
            Communications Commission (FCC) and not subject to PUC  
            jurisdiction.  In fact, Nextel is subject to both FCC and PUC  
            jurisdiction.  Duque disclosed the stock ownership on his 1999  
            and 2000 statements of economic interest.  Duque sold the  
            stock in 2000, after receiving a call from a reporter about  
            the stock.

          On January 3, 2003, the First Appellate District of the  
            California Court of Appeals overturned that order and ruled  
            that under the plain meaning of the statue the law doesn't  
            specify any penalty for commissioners who voluntarily invest  
            in a regulated company.  The law only provides for forfeiture  
            of office if the Commissioner involuntarily acquires an  
            interest in a regulated company.  The court stated that "we  
            must limit ourselves to interpreting the law as written and  
            leave for the people and the Legislature the task of revising  
            it as they deem wise."   People v. Duque  , 105 Cal. App 4th 259,  
            266.  This bill is intended to address the Appellate Court  
            Decision and close the gap in the statute's wording.

           2)What is a "Financial Interest"  ?  This bill prohibits a member  
            of the PUC from participating in any matter that affects his  
            or her own financial interest or the financial interest of his  
            or her spouse, minor child, or partner; or of any organization  
            in which he or she is serving, or has served as an officer or  
            director, trustee, partner, or employee within two years prior  
            to his or her appointment to the PUC.  However, the Public  
            Utilities Code does not contain a definition of the term  
            "financial interest," and the PRA defines what constitutes a  
            decision in which a public official has a financial interest,  
            but does not define what constitutes a financial interest in a  
            corporation or person.

          The lack of a definition of "financial interest" in this bill  
            could make it difficult for members of the PUC to comply, and  
            could result in conflicting and arbitrary application of this  
            bill.

           3)Voluntary Acquisition of a Financial Interest  :  Under existing  
            law, a PUC commissioner is prohibited from holding an official  
            relationship with, or having a financial interest in, any  
            person or corporation subject to regulation by the PUC.  If a  








                                                                  SB 204
                                                                  Page  4

            PUC commissioner involuntarily acquires a financial interest  
            in a person or corporation subject to regulation by the PUC,  
            that commissioner must either divest himself or herself of  
            that interest within a reasonable time, or the commissioner  
            must leave office.  However, existing law does not provide a  
            remedy if a commissioner voluntarily acquires a financial  
            interest in a person or corporation subject to regulation by  
            the PUC.

          This bill specifies that if a PUC commissioner voluntarily  
            acquires a financial interest in a person or corporation  
            subject to regulation by the PUC, in violation of existing  
            law, his or her office shall immediately become vacant.  
           
           4)Double-Referral  :  On June 27, 2005, this bill was approved by  
            the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce by a vote of  
            7-4.

           5)Reconsideration  :  On July 5, 2005, this bill failed passage in  
            this committee by a vote of 3-3.  Since that time, this bill  
            has been amended to remove a section of the bill that would  
            have prohibited a person who received a substantial portion of  
            his or her income directly or indirectly from any person or  
            corporation subject to regulation by the PUC in the previous  
            two years from being a member of the PUC, and would have  
            prohibited a member of the PUC from being employed by any  
            person or corporation subject to regulation by the PUC during  
            the term of his or her service on the PUC and for two years  
            after he or she ceases being a member of the PUC.
           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          None on file.
          
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094