BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: AB 1413
          SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, CHAIRMAN                AUTHOR:  Devore
                                                         VERSION: 2/22/05
          Analysis by: Randall Henry                               
          FISCAL:yes




          SUBJECT:

          Traffic accident notification.

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill would eliminate the requirement that a motorist  
          involved in an accident resulting only in property damage notify  
          the appropriate law enforcement agency of the accident.

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law:

                 Requires the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident  
               resulting only in damage to property to immediately leave  
               in a conspicuous place on the vehicle or other property  
               that is damaged a written notice giving the name and  
               address of the driver and the vehicle owner involved and a  
               statement of circumstances regarding the accident.
                 Notify immediately the appropriate local law enforcement  
               agency.

           This   bill   would  eliminate the requirement that the local law  
          enforcement agency be notified.

          BACKGROUND:

          Vehicle Code Sec. 20002, "Permissible Action: Duty Where  
          Property Damage," requires the driver of a vehicle involved in  
          an accident that results in only property damage to immediately  
          stop the vehicle in a safe place and do either of the following:

                       Present, upon being requested, his or her driver's  
                  license and vehicle registration to the other driver,  
                  property owner, or person in charge of that property.
                       Leave "in a conspicuous place on the vehicle or  




          AB 1413 (DEVORE)                                          Page 2

                                                                       


                  other property damaged a written notice giving the name  
                  and address of the driver and of the owner of the  
                  vehicle involved and a statement of the circumstances  
                  thereof and  shall without unnecessary delay notify the  
                  police department of the city wherein the collision  
                  occurred or, if the collision occurred in unincorporated  
                  territory, the local headquarters of  the  California  
                  Highway Patrol  ."

          A failure to comply with any of these requirements is a  
          misdemeanor violation, punishable by imprisonment in the county  
          jail for a period not exceeding six months, or by a fine not  
          exceeding $1,000, or both.

          The requirement that the appropriate law enforcement agency be  
          contacted was added in 1959, and the purpose of this provision  
          was to enable the person that had suffered the property damage  
          to identify the person that had caused the damage if the  
          required written notice had been dislodged and lost.  This  
          requirement also protects the at-fault motorist from being  
          charged with a violation if the written notice is lost and never  
          discovered by the damaged party.     
          
          COMMENTS:

              1.   Purpose of the bill  .  The author argues that the  
               requirement that a motorist notify the local law  
               enforcement agency of a property damage-only accident is  
               unnecessary and should not be required if the other  
               notification requirements are in place.  He further asserts  
               that most motorists are not even aware of the law  
               enforcement notification requirement and many law  
               enforcement agencies no longer routinely enforce this  
               provision.

              2.   Property damage accidents  .  According to the California  
               Highway Patrol, there were 330,055 property damage  
               accidents in 2003 in the state, and approximately 25  
               percent of those accidents involved the responsible party  
               leaving the scene of the accident without completing the  
               required notification.

              3.   Policy questions  .

                           Should the law require more than a note left  
                    at an accident scene involving property damage,  




          AB 1413 (DEVORE)                                          Page 3

                                                                       


                    particularly where significant damage is involved?
                           What evidence is there that the current  
                    notification requirement to a law enforcement agency  
                    is "an unnecessary burden on motorists"?  What  
                    justification has the author presented that this  
                    change is warranted?
                           Do the reports serve as a needed evidentiary  
                    backup if the written notice is lost?
                           Do the reports serve as possible investigation  
                    tools for law enforcement agencies?
                           Do the reports sometime result in the  
                    initiation of needed expeditious repair of damaged  
                    property, such as a freeway emergency callbox or a  
                    fence enclosing livestock or other animals?   
          
          Assembly Votes:
               Floor:    66-4
               Appr: 18-0
               Trans:      9-2
          
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the Committee before noon on  
          Wednesday,
                     June 1, 2005.)

               SUPPORT:  None received.
          
               OPPOSED:  None received.