BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1383|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1383
          Author:   Pavley (D), et al.
          Amended:  9/2/05 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.& C. COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 6/30/05
          AYES:  Escutia, Alarcon, Bowen, Dunn, Kehoe, Murray,  
            Simitian
          NOES:  Morrow, Battin, Cox
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Campbell

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-5, 8/25/05
          AYES:  Migden, Alarcon, Alquist, Escutia, Florez, Murray,  
            Ortiz, Romero
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Battin, Dutton, Poochigian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  47-32, 6/1/05 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Solar energy:  Low-Income Housing Development  
          Revolving
                         Loan Program

           SOURCE  :     Global Green


           DIGEST  :    This bill creates a grant to facilitate the  
          installation of solar energy systems in low-income housing.

           ANALYSIS  :    Current law establishes several programs to  
          subsidize the cost of photovoltaic (PV) systems used by  
          retail electric customers.  These subsidies are up-front  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1383
                                                                Page  
          2

          discounts on the installed cost of such systems.

          This bill creates a revolving loan program, administered by  
          the California Energy Commission (CEC), for use by  
          affordable housing developers to finance up to 75 percent  
          of the cost of photovoltaic systems.  The program is funded  
          out of existing funds set aside for photovoltaic subsidies.  
           The program sunsets on January 1, 2016.

          This bill requires CEC to evaluate the level of funding  
          needed and provides that a certain amount of moneys would  
          be transferred from the Emerging Renewable Resources  
          Account and the self-generation incentive program for  
          distributed generation resources.

          The bill requires CEC to collect a fee for each application  
          for an allocation.  The bill sets forth requirements for  
          repayment of the allocations.  

          This bill requires CEC to submit a report, by October 31,  
          2007, and annually thereafter, to the Legislature on the  
          portfolio of loans, the condition of the fund, and the  
          anticipated demand.  CEC would also be required to report  
          by January 1, 2006 on the estimated amounts needed to be  
          transferred to the fund from various specified sources,  
          upon appropriation of the Legislature.

           Background
           
           What's a Photovoltaic System?
           
          A photovoltaic, or PV, system has two main parts, the  
          roof-mounted PV panels which transform sunlight into  
          electricity and the inverter which transforms the direct  
          current created by the PV panels into alternating current  
          which is usable in the home or on the electric grid.  The  
          orientation of the PV panels is crucial to the success of  
          the system; they must be south- or west-facing.  The panels  
          must not be shaded and should be angled to capture the most  
          sunlight.  A typical residential PV system is 2kw - 4kw.   
          The installed cost is about $9000/kw so a 3kw system would  
          cost $27,000.  Rebates have been as high as $4500/kw and  
          are now at $2,800/kw, so the 3kw system would today cost  
          $18,600 after rebates.  A state tax credit would further  







                                                               AB 1383
                                                                Page  
          3

          reduce the price by 7.5 percent to $17,205.  For commercial  
          customers the final after-tax cost is much lower because of  
          greatly accelerated depreciation and a 10 percent federal  
          tax credit.

           Current Subsidies
           
          California has several subsidy programs targeted  
          specifically at PV systems.  The CEC administers a program  
          for residential- and small commercial-sized PV systems that  
          provides a rebate for a portion of the installed cost of a  
          PV system.  That rebate was initially $4.50/watt, or about  
          50 percent of the system cost, and has since been lowered  
          to $2.80/watt.  This program is funded through the Public  
          Goods Charge (PGC), which is a surcharge on all IOU  
          electric customers, and is budgeted at about $30 million  
          annually, though in 2004 the program spent $70 million on  
          PV.  The Public Utilities Commission administers a similar  
          program for commercial-sized customer-owned generation,  
          including PV systems.  This program, known as the  
          Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP), costs $125  
          million annually and is paid for out of electric rates.   
          The SGIP PV subsidy is $3.50/watt and is oversubscribed.

          In addition to these two subsidy programs there are  
          numerous other state and federal programs which  
          substantially reduce the after-tax cost of PV systems,  
          particularly for commercial customers.  These include a 10  
          percent federal tax credit, accelerated depreciation, a 7.5  
          percent state tax credit, accelerated depreciation for  
          state taxes, and favorable property tax treatment.  By  
          themselves these tax benefits for commercial customers are  
          worth more than the state subsidy, according to CEC  
          estimates.  Other state subsidies are net metering, which  
          reverses the electric meter as electricity is produced, and  
          an exemption from exit fees.

           Affordable Housing
           
          Of the 20,000 affordable housing units built annually in  
          California, about 5000 are financed through tax credits.   
          The tax credit financing, which is administered by the  
          California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, an arm of state  
          government whose voting members include the Governor,  







                                                               AB 1383
                                                                Page  
          4

          Treasurer, and Controller, uses the funds from the sales of  
          tax credits to investors.  The amount of tax credits  
          allocated to any affordable housing project is reduced by  
          any revenue received by the project, which includes rebates  
          for PV systems.  For this reason solar rebates do not  
          encourage the use of PV systems in affordable housing  
          projects that rely on tax credit financing.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                     2005-06     2006-07     
           2007-08          Fund  
          Transfers                     $2,500$5,000$5,000       
          Special*

          *The bill transfers funds from the Emergency Renewable  
          Resources Account and the fund identified (and unnamed) in  
          subdivision (a) of Chapter 329 (Statutes of 2000), or from  
          the funds appropriated in SB 1 (Murray and Campbell), the  
          Million Solar Roofs Initiative.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/18/05)

          Global Green (source)
          American Federation of State, County, and Municipal  
          Employees
          California Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies
          Clean Power Campaign
          Cooperative Community Energy
          First Community Housing
          Habitat for Humanity
          Housing California
          Kyocera Solar, Inc.
          PV Manufacturers Alliance
          Sierra Club California
          Southern California Association of Non-Profit Housing
          Union of Concerned Scientists
          Vote Solar
          Western Center on Law and Poverty







                                                               AB 1383
                                                                Page  
          5



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Arambula, Baca, Bass, Berg, Bermudez, Calderon,  
            Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cohn, Coto, De La Torre,  
            Dymally, Evans, Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome  
            Horton, Jones, Karnette, Klehs, Koretz, Laird, Leno,  
            Levine, Lieber, Liu, Matthews, Montanez, Mullin, Nation,  
            Nava, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Torrico, Umberg,  
            Vargas, Wolk, Yee, Nunez
          NOES:  Aghazarian, Benoit, Blakeslee, Bogh, Cogdill,  
            Daucher, DeVore, Emmerson, Garcia, Harman, Haynes,  
            Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Keene, La Malfa, La Suer,  
            Leslie, Maze, McCarthy, Mountjoy, Nakanishi, Niello,  
            Plescia, Richman, Sharon Runner, Spitzer, Strickland,  
            Tran, Villines, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gordon


          NC:nl  9/3/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****