BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1383
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1383 (Pavley)
          As Amended May 27, 2005
          Majority vote 

           HOUSING                  5-1                        UTILITIES &  
          COMMERCE   7-3      
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Mullin, Baca, Hancock,    |Ayes:|Levine, Baca, Jones, De   |
          |     |Salinas, Torrico          |     |La Torre, Jerome Horton,  |
          |     |                          |     |Montanez,                 |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas             |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Garcia                    |Nays:|Bogh, Keene, Wyland       |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS          13-5                                    
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Mullin,         |     |                          |
          |     |Karnette, Klehs, Leno,    |     |                          |
          |     |Nation, Oropeza,          |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Saldana,   |     |                          |
          |     |Yee                       |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |     |                          |
          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |     |                          |
          |     |Walters                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Allows THE California Energy Commission (CEC) to  
          increase the maximum allowable rebates for installation of solar  
          energy systems on affordable housing projects from 75% of the  
          installed costs to a level of up to 100% of the total installed  
          costs to stimulate increased participation in the current rebate  
          program from affordable housing.  
           
           EXISTING LAW  :   









                                                                  AB 1383
                                                                  Page  2


          1)Provides $135 million annually to the Renewable Resource Trust  
            Fund from investor-owned utility (IOU) customers' rates to  
            provide rebates and credits for renewable energy programs.

          2)Provides subsidies for photovoltaic (PV) solar energy systems  
            which total about $30 million annually, accounting for roughly  
            half of the installed cost of a system.  

          3)Establishes a separate program for the installation of PV  
            energy systems on affordable housing projects.  The subsidy  
            for these systems is capped at 75% of the installed cost.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Based on an average solar energy rebate amount  
          to date of about $11,300 (at 75%), increasing the rebate to 100%  
          would increase the average grant by about $3,800.  To maintain  
          current grant volume, total funding for affordable housing  
          rebates would have to increase by $620,000 per year or, at the  
          same level of funding, the number of grants would decline by  
          25%.

           COMMENTS  :  The author wishes to reduce the development costs of  
          affordable housing projects that utilize solar energy systems by  
          allowing state rebates to cover 100% of project costs.  CEC  
          administers programs to provide rebates to consumers who install  
          qualifying renewable energy systems, including solar systems, on  
          their homes.  Under this program, qualifying affordable housing  
          projects can obtain an additional rebate above the standard  
          rebate, but not to exceed 75% of the system cost.  

          Since March, 2003, CEC has approved 327 affordable housing  
          rebate requests representing 765 kW of potential electricity  
          production.  If all of the projects are completed CEC will pay  
          out approximately $3.7 million in rebates to affordable housing  
          projects.  The solar energy rebate program is heavily  
          oversubscribed, and in order to better meet demand, CEC has had  
          to transfer funds from other renewable programs.  

          According to the sponsor, Global Green, affordable housing  
          developers currently have a difficult time paying for the  
          installation of solar energy systems because they cannot afford  
          the added debt on the projects even when 75% of the solar energy  
          system is paid for through the existing rebate program.  

          Federal tax programs grant tax credits to affordable housing  








                                                                  AB 1383
                                                                  Page  3


          developers, but these credits can be reduced if the developers  
          receive grants since grants lower the total costs to the  
          developers.  The developer could maximize their federal tax  
          credits and the state could better maximize moneys set aside to  
          promote the installation of solar energy systems if the state  
          helps fund solar installations through loan programs, which do  
          not lower the total cost of the project for tax purposes and  
          consequently do not reduce the tax credits.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U.  & C.  / (916)  
          319-2083 



                                                                FN: 0010814