BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1222
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 25, 2005

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                                Jenny Oropeza, Chair
                 AB 1222 (Jones) - As Introduced:  February 22, 2005
           
          SUBJECT  :  Locomotive Air Pollution Control

           SUMMARY  :  Establishes a High-Polluting Locomotive Program.   
          Specifically,  this bill :  

          1)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding air  
            quality in California and the contribution of locomotives to  
            that problem.  

          2)Requires the Air Resources Board (ARB) to establish a program  
            to encourage voluntary testing, repair, maintenance, or  
            replacement of high-polluting locomotives by their owners or  
            operators.  

          3)Specifies that the program must include: remote sensing or  
            other techniques and technologies to identify high-polluting  
            locomotives; notification procedures to inform the locomotive  
            owner or operator and the public regarding the operation of a  
            locomotive determined to be high-polluting; and a public data  
            bank for the purpose of tracking the testing, repair,  
            maintenance, and replacement of high-polluting locomotives.  

          4)Defines a high polluting locomotive as one that emits air  
            contaminants at a rate determined by ARB to be:  

             a)   Inconsistent with best repair and maintenance practices;  
                

             b)   25% or more in excess of certification standards  
               applicable to the locomotive, or, if no certification  
               standard is applicable, at a rate 25% or more in excess of  
               average emission rates for similar, well-maintained  
               locomotives;  and, 

             c)   Likely to be within the top 20% of emissions rates of  
               locomotives operating in a nonattainment area, including,  
               but not limited to, locomotives of any age that are in line  
               haul or switcher service.  









                                                                  AB 1222
                                                                  Page  2

          5)Requires ARB to adopt regulations necessary to implement this  
            bill, including, but not limited to, requirements for the  
            owner or operator of a locomotive to provide ARB specified  
            information regarding the locomotive's history or operating  
            parameters.  

          6)Specifies that if any provision of this bill or its  
            application is held invalid, the Legislature intends that the  
            invalidity not affect other provisions or applications of the  
            bill, and that its provisions are severable.  

          7)Allows ARB, at a public hearing, to impose a fee on owners or  
            operators of locomotives operating within the state for the  
            purpose of recovering the costs of implementing this bill.  

          8)Allows ARB to contract with another state agency for the  
            collection of those fees.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  Makes ARB responsible for the control of  
          emissions from motor vehicles and the coordination, management,  
          and review of the efforts of all level of government as they  
          affect air quality.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The author reports that over the years, stringent  
          regulations in California have reduced emissions by over 90%,  
          from most significant stationary sources and from motor vehicles  
          and other mobile sources under the jurisdiction of state and  
          local authorities.  However, federal law preempts state and  
          local jurisdictions from establishing exhaust emission  
          requirements on locomotives.  As a result, these sources have  
          been controlled far less stringently and have not achieved what  
          the author and this bill's supporters deem to be the industry's  
          fair share of emission reductions needed to meet state and  
          federal clean air standards.  

          Railroad locomotives have been estimated to emit over 177 tons  
          of smog-forming nitrogen oxides of nitrogen (NOx) per day in the  
          state.  Their exhaust also includes diesel particulates, which  
          are designated toxic air contaminants based on carcinogenic  
          effects.  The author contends that due to the close proximity of  
          their operations to populated areas, and the toxic nature of  
          diesel exhaust, locomotives can pose a significant risk to  
          public health and safety if they are not well-maintained or if  








                                                                  AB 1222
                                                                  Page  3

          they are not repaired or replaced when necessary.  

          Additionally, supporters point out that rail traffic may triple  
          in Southern California by 2020, which will surely heighten  
          concern over locomotive emissions.  

          Finally, it should be noted that this bill does not mandate any  
          actions by the rail industry to repair or replace locomotives.   
          It simply creates a mechanism to identify those locomotives that  
          need attention.  

          The California Railroad Industry, representing Union Pacific,  
          BNSF Railway, and the California Shortline Railroad Association,  
          contends that "remote sensing technology does not exist that is  
          capable of measuring emissions from a locomotive as envisioned  
          in this bill.  It does not make sense to require the railroads  
          to pay for technology that has yet to be proven to work on  
          locomotives."  The Industry argues that its railroads have an  
          existing smoke monitoring program, performing over 10,000 smoke  
          inspections a year, to ensure that locomotives are meeting  
          opacity standards and running efficiently.  The opacity test  
          results are submitted monthly to the South Coast Air Quality  
          Management District.  The Industry also points to a memorandum  
          of understanding with ARB, under which new, cleaner locomotives  
          are being introduced into the South Coast basin, which will  
          reduce locomotive emissions by two-thirds in the next few years.  
           Thereafter, they contend, "the chances of identifying any high  
          emitters will be very slim.  The program will not be cost  
          effective."  

          Cal-Tax, writing in opposition, argues that this bill  
          constitutes "an end run around the Constitution" by imposing a  
          tax and calling it a fee, thereby attempting to avoid a  
          two-thirds vote requirement in the Legislature.  They also  
          contend that the fee will undercut the state's economic growth  
          and create a drag on the economy.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          American Lung Association
          City of Arcadia
          City of Banning
          City of Bell Gardens








                                                                  AB 1222
                                                                  Page  4

          City of Bradbury
          City of Calimesa
          City of Colton
          City of Commerce
          City of Covina
          City of Duarte
          City of El Monte
          City of Gardena
          City of Hawaiian Gardens
          City of Irvine
          City of LaVerne
          City of Lomita
          City of Maywood
          City of Monrovia
          City of Montebello
          City of Monterey Park
          City of Palm Desert
          City of Pico Rivera
          City of Rolling Hills Estates
          City of San Bernardino
          City of Santa Fe Springs
          City of South El Monte
          City of South Pasadena
          El Monte/South El Monte Chamber of Commerce
          Industrial Council - Chamber of Commerce
          League of California Cities, Los Angeles County Division
          South Bay Cities Council of Governments
          South Coast Air Quality Management District
          Western Riverside Council of Governments
          Letters from 106 individuals

           Opposition 
           
          California Railroad Industry
          Cal-Tax
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Howard Posner / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093