BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1010|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1010
Author: Ruskin (D), et al
Amended: 8/23/06 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE ENERGY, UTIL . & COMMUNIC. COMMITTEE : 7-3, 6/27/06
AYES: Escutia, Alarcon, Bowen, Dunn, Kehoe, Murray,
Simitian
NOES: Cox, Battin, Dutton
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not relevant
SUBJECT : Telecommunications: mobile telephony services
SOURCE : Consumer Federation of California
DIGEST : This bill requires cellular telephone companies
to provide their customers with a 21-day right of
rescission exercisable if the customer finds the service
unsatisfactory.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/23/06 limit the scope of the
bill. They reduce from 30 days to 21 days, the right of
rescission and limit this right to rescind to new
customers.
ANALYSIS : Current law bars states from regulating the
entry of, and the rates charged by, cellular telephone
companies, but permits states to regulate the other terms
and conditions of service.
CONTINUED
AB 1010
Page
2
This bill requires cellular telephone companies to provide
their customers with a 21-day right of rescission
exercisable if the customer finds the service
unsatisfactory. This provision does not apply where
customers have month to month accounts or prepaid service,
and applies only to new customers.
Background
The fight over telephone consumer protection issues has
raged since the turn of this century. A five year effort
to establish and enforce strong consumer protection rules
at the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) succeeded and was
then rescinded a victim of an ideological battle over the
proper role of government.
There can be no doubting the popularity of cell phone
service. Over 200 million Americans have cell phone
service, 23 million of which are Californians. Along with
the popularity has come some consumer dissatisfaction. The
Federal Communications Commission has noted an increase in
consumer complaints. Poor cellular service is the second
largest complaint to the Better Business Bureau, trailing
only auto dealers. Forty-five million cell phone customers
switch every year, according to a recent report by a
respected market research firm. Even the industry admits
it has problems, an officer of one of the largest cell
phone companies recently admitted to the New York Times:
"It's no secret that the wireless industry doesn't have the
world's greatest reputation for customer service."
Comments
Unnecessary ? Opponents argue that this bill is unneeded,
and that there is little demand for a 30-day right of
rescission. Better, they argue, to let the market decide
what return policy is best. A cell phone company should be
able to choose whether to spend money on improving the
quality of its network rather than establishing a costly
30-day return policy.
Will the phone work where I want to use it ? Every cellular
telephone company provides coverage maps to show where
AB 1010
Page
3
their service is available. However, those maps are much
generalized and are not guarantees of coverage. A
customer's ability to complete or continue a call in a
given location can vary depending on the time of year, the
height of the buildings in a given area, call volumes,
radio interference, and phone quality. In the absence of
accurate maps, the only way for a customer to know if the
cellular phone meets their needs is to use it for a period
of time. If a customer is required to sign a long-term
contract to obtain service, that customer is potentially
stuck if he/she finds the service is less than was
advertised or promised. This bill guarantees customers a
reasonable way to get out of a long-term contract
commitment if the product they bought does not live up to
their expectations or to the promises made by the carrier.
Cell phones are almost indispensable, and the technology is
truly amazing and evolving. But when one of the major
cellular carriers advertises that its service is not as bad
as their competitors (e.g. fewest dropped calls), it helps
make the case for this bill.
State mandated warranties are the rule, not the exception .
Most products sold in California are covered by the
Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civil Code 1790 et.
seq.) that provides buyers with a 60-day implied warranty
of fitness. Because cell phone service is considered a
"service" and not a "product," those contracts aren't
covered by the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, though
it is a fair question as to whether Song-Beverly applies to
the cellular phone.
30 days is the norm . For a short time in late 2004, the
PUC instituted a rule requiring a 30-day cancellation
policy, though that rule was rescinded when two PUC
commissioners were replaced by the current Administration.
Most major cellular carriers still offer 30-day
cancellation policies.
Prior legislation . The Senate has passed similar bills
before in 2002 and 2003. This year, AB 2622 (Ruskin), was
moved to Interim Study in the Assembly Utilities and
Commerce Committee.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
AB 1010
Page
4
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 6/28/06) (Unable to reverify)
Asian Law Alliance
California Alliance for Retired Americans
California Community Technology Policy Group
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit
Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Labor Federation
California Public Interest Research Group
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Central American Resource Center
Communications Workers of America
Consumer Attorneys of California
Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles
Consumer Attorneys of California
Disability Rights Advocates
Eastside Neighborhood Center
Echo Park Community Coalition
El Concilio of San Mateo County
Engineers and Scientists of California
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County
Madera Coalition for Community Justice
Merced Lao Family Community, Inc.
Office of Attorney General
Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21
Strategic Committee of Public Employees, Laborers
International Union
of North America
The Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights
The Utility Reform Network
UFCW Local 428
UNITE HERE!
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Western States
Council
Utility Consumers' Action Network
OPPOSITION : (Verified 6/28/06) (Unable to reverify)
Cingular Wireless
AB 1010
Page
5
CTIA-The Wireless Association
Public Utilities Commission
Sprint Nextel
T-Mobile USA
Verizon Wireless
NC:do 8/24/06 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****