BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 843|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 843
          Author:   Nunez (D)
          Amended:  8/16/05 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SEN. BUS., PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMM.  :  4-2, 6/20/05
          AYES:  Figueroa, Florez, Murray, Simitian
          NOES:  Campbell, Aanestad
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Morrow

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 7/12/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Cedillo, Escutia, Figueroa, Kuehl
          NOES:  Morrow, Ackerman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  44-30, 5/19/05 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Tax preparers

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits a tax preparer who  
          advertises the availability of a refund anticipation loan  
          (RAL) from representing the loan as a clients actual tax  
          refund and from engaging in other activities regarding a  
          RAL, as specified, and requires a tax preparer that offers  
          to make or facilitate a RAL to clearly and conspicuously  
          disclose certain information in a specified manner  
          regarding a RAL.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          2


           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing Law (Tax Preparer Law)

           1.Defines "tax preparer" as a person who, for a fee or for  
             other consideration, assists with or prepares tax  
             returns for another person or who assumes final  
             responsibility for completed work on a return on which  
             preliminary work has been done by another person, or who  
             holds himself out as offering those services.

           2.Defines "tax preparer" as a corporation, partnership,  
             association, or other entity that has associated with it  
             persons who have as part of their responsibilities the  
             preparation of data and ultimate signatory authority of  
             tax returns or that holds itself out as offering those  
             services or having that authority.

           3.Specifies that a "tax preparer" does not include an  
             employee who, as part of the regular clerical duties of  
             employment, prepares his or her employer's income, sales  
             or payroll tax returns.

           4.Defines "tax return" as a return, declaration,  
             statement, refund claim, or other document required to  
             be made or filed in connection with state or federal  
             income taxes or state bank and corporation franchise  
             taxes.

           5.Establishes the California Tax Education Council (CTEC)  
             that is made up of various representatives of  
             professional associations that represent tax preparers,  
             enrolled agents, attorneys, or certified public  
             accountants, and representatives from each for-profit  
             tax preparation corporation with California.

           6.Establishes various requirements for tax preparers  
             including obligations to:

             A.    Register with the CTEC.

             B.    Obtain a "certificate of completion" based upon  
                completing a tax education curriculum, as specified.







                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          3


             C.    Maintain a surety bond of $5,000 payable to State  
                of California.  The bond shall be for the benefit of  
                any person or persons damaged by any fraud,  
                dishonesty, misstatement, misrepresentation, deceit,  
                or any unlawful acts or omissions by the tax  
                preparer.

           7.Requires that a tax preparer not disclose confidential  
             information regarding a client without the written  
             permission of the client, except in specific instances,  
             as provided.

           8.States that it is the intent of the Legislature to  
             encourage all persons who prepare state income tax  
             returns, including tax preparers, to inform their  
             clients in writing, prior to completion of any state  
             income tax returns, that they may make a contribution to  
             any voluntary contribution check-off on the state income  
             tax return if they so choose.

           9.Makes it a violation for tax preparers to fail to  
             register with CTEC, make fraudulent, untrue and  
             misleading statements to customers, fail to sign a  
             customer's tax return when payment for services rendered  
             has been made, fail to return a customer's records upon  
             his or her request, knowingly give false or misleading  
             information to the consumer, the surety company or CTEC,  
             or commit any other acts or omissions, as specified.

          10.Provides that the Franchise Tax Board, pursuant to an  
             agreement with CTEC, may cite and fine tax preparers for  
             any violations, as specified, or issue a cease and  
             desist offer.

          11.Provides that the Superior Court in the county where any  
             person acts as a tax preparer in violation of the tax  
             preparer law, may, upon petition by any person, issue an  
             injunction or other appropriate order restraining the  
             conduct.

          12.Provides that a person who violates the tax preparer law  
             is guilty of a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine  
             not exceeding $1,000 or by imprisonment in a county jail  







                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          4

             for not more than one year, or by both.

          13.Provides that any person may maintain an action or  
             enforcement of any duties specifically imposed upon the  
             tax preparer pursuant to the tax preparer law or to  
             recover a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000, or for  
             both enforcement and recovery, and provides the  
             prevailing plaintiff with attorney's fees and costs in  
             addition to the civil penalties.

          14.Exempts the following entities from compliance with the  
             tax preparer law:

             A.    Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) licensed by  
                the California Board of Accountancy.

             B.    Active members of the California State Bar and  
                their employees.

             C.    Trust company and trust business employees, as  
                defined.

             D.    Financial institutions regulated by the federal  
                government, as specified.

             E.    Persons enrolled to practice before the Internal  
                Revenue Service (IRS) pursuant to federal  
                regulations.

          Existing law (Civil Code) requires that any person in a  
          trade or business who negotiates primarily in Spanish,  
          Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, or Korean, orally or in  
          writing, in the course of entering into a contract, a loan  
          or extension of credit, a lease or rental agreement, shall  
          deliver to the other party a translation of the document(s)  
          used for those purposes prior to the execution of the  
          contract, loan, extension of credit, lease, or rental  
          agreement.

           Existing Federal Law

           1.Establishes various laws, rules and regulations that  
            govern the activities of attorneys, certified public  
            accountants, enrolled agents, and other persons  







                                                               AB 843
                                                                Page  
          5

            representing clients before the IRS.  Some of those laws  
            are the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Internal Revenue Code  
            and Regulations and the IRS Revenue Procedure 2000-31.

          2.Provides various law and regulations governing RALs.  The  
            key provisions of IRS Revenue procedure 2000-31 and the  
            Handbook for Authorized IRS e-file Providers of  
            Individual Income Tax Returns require:

             A.    Tax returns involving A RAL must be electronically  
                filed with the IRS, which requires the tax preparer  
                to be a federally-regulated Electronic Return  
                Originator (ERO).

             B.    A tax return prepare who is an ERO cannot also be  
                a lender.

             C.    All parties to RAL agreements must ensure that  
                taxpayers understand that RALs are interest bearing  
                loans and not substitutes for or a faster way of  
                receiving a tax refund.

             D.    Reference to funds advanced must clearly and in  
                readable print refer to a loan, not a refund.

             E.    Ads must clearly indicate the taxpayer is  
                borrowing against the anticipated refund and not  
                obtaining the refund itself from the financial  
                institution.

             F.    Fees charges by EROs must be the same for all  
                customers.

          This bill:

           1.Defines "client" as an individual for whom a taxpayer  
             performs or agrees to perform tax preparation services.

           2.Defines "refund anticipation loan" as a loan, whether  
             provided by the tax preparer or another entity, such as  
             a financial institution, in anticipation of, and whose  
             payment is secured by a client's federal or state income  
             tax refund or by both.








                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          6

          3. Defines "borrower" as a client who received the proceeds  
             of a RAL.

          4. Defines "refund anticipation loan fee schedule" as a  
             listing or table of refund anticipation loan fees that  
             includes three or more representative refund  
             anticipation loan amounts.  The schedule will not list  
             separately each fee or charge imposed, as well as a  
             total of all fees imposed, related to the making of  
             refund anticipation loans.  The schedule will also  
             include, for each representative amount, the estimated  
             annual percentage rate calculated under the guidelines  
             established by the Federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.  
             Section 1601, et seq.

           5.Prohibits tax preparers who advertise the availability  
             of a RAL from directly or indirectly representing the  
             loan as a client's actual refund.  Any advertisement  
             that mentions a RAL shall state conspicuously that it is  
             a loan and that a fee or interest will be charged by the  
             lending institution.  The advertisement shall also  
             disclose the name of the lending institution.

           6.Requires tax preparers who offer to make or facilitate  
             RALs to display a schedule showing the current fees  
             related to a RAL for the electronic filing of the tax  
             return, or setting up a refund account and any other  
             related activities necessary to receive a RAL, and  
             requires that the fee schedule also include a statement  
             indicating that the client may have the tax return filed  
             electronically without also obtaining a RAL.

          7. Requires that a tax preparer who facilitates a refund  
             application loan provide the borrower, prior to the  
             borrower's completion of the loan application, a clear,  
             written disclosure containing the following information:

             A.    The refund anticipation loan fee schedule.

             B.    That a refund anticipation loan is a loan, and is  
                not the borrower's actual income tax refund.

             C.    That the taxpayer can file an income tax return  
                electronically without applying for a refund  







                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          7

                anticipation loan.

             D.    The average times, according to the Internal  
                Revenue Service, within which a taxpayer who does not  
                obtain a refund anticipation loan can expect to  
                receive a refund if the taxpayer's return is (1)  
                filed electronically and the refund is directly  
                deposited to the taxpayer's bank account or mailed to  
                the taxpayer, and (2) mailed to the Internal Revenue  
                Service and the refund is directly deposited to the  
                taxpayer's bank account or mailed to the taxpayer.

             E.    That the Internal Revenue Service does not  
                guarantee that it wilil pay the full amount of the  
                anticipated refund and does not guarantee a specific  
                date that a refund will be deposited into the  
                taxpayer's financial institution account or mailed to  
                a taxpayer.

             F.    That the borrow is responsible for repayment of  
                the loan and related fees in the event that the tax  
                refund is not paid or not paid in full.

             G.    The estimated time within which the loan proceeds  
                will be paid to the borrower if the loan is approved.

             H.    The fee that will be charged, if any, if the  
                borrower's loan is not approved.

          8. Provides that a tax preparer who facilitates a refund  
             anticipation loan must provide the borrow, in either  
             written or electronic form, the following information,  
             prior to the borrower's consummation of the loan:

             A.    The estimated total fees for obtaining the refund  
                application loan.

             B.    The estimated annual percentage rate for the  
                borrower's refund anticipation loan, using the  
                guidelines established under the Federal Truth in  
                Lending Act.

             C.    A comparison of the various costs, fees, and  
                finance charges, if applicable, associated with  







                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          8

                receiving a refund by mail or by direct deposit  
                directly form the Internal Revenue Service, a refund  
                anticipation loan, a refund anticipation check or any  
                other refund settlement options facilitated by the  
                tax preparation service.

           Background

          How are RALs Made  ?  A RAL is a high interest, short-term  
          loan generally made by a bank, but offered through a tax  
          preparer.  When a consumer uses a tax preparer to calculate  
          his or her taxes and is eligible for a refund, the preparer  
          then offers the consumer a way to get the money in just a  
          few days with a RAL.  From the consumer's perspective, the  
          RAL may be attractive because the money is available in a  
          day or two rather than the two to three weeks it takes to  
          get an electronic refund or check from the IRS.  The loan  
          is repaid when the tax refund is deposited into a temporary  
          account controlled by the bank.  If the refund is less than  
          anticipated or is offset by other debts (such as child  
          support), the consumer still must repay the RAL.

           Who Gets RALs  ?  About one in 10 American tax preparers took  
          out RALs in 2002, over half of them low-wage workers who  
          receive a refundable credit provided through the tax system  
          and intended to boost low-wage workers out of poverty.  The  
          rates for these 10-day loans range from about 40 percent  
          (for a loan of $9,999) to over 700 percent (for a loan of  
          $200), or 70 percent to over 1,700 percent if  
          administrative or application fees are included.  According  
          to the National Consumer Law Center, "Consumers paid an  
          estimated $1 billion in RAL fees, plus an additional $389  
          million in administrative or application fees in 2003 to  
          get quick cash for their refunds; essentially borrowing  
          their own money at extremely high interest rates."

           Other States' Legislation on RALs  .  The following states  
          have introduced RAL legislation in 2005:  Connecticut (HB  
          5830 and SB 1070), Iowa (SF 145), New Jersey (AB 3881), New  
          Mexico (SB 876 and HJM 100), New York (AB 1366, AB 1971,  
          and SB 3198), Ohio (SB 59), Oregon (SB 968 and HB 2995),  
          Texas (SB 1020 and HB 398), Washington (HB 1251, SB 5692  
          and SB 5796).








                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          9

          Currently, the states of Connecticut, Illinois, Minnesota,  
          North Carolina and Wisconsin have imposed regulatory  
          restraints on RALs.

           Previous Similar Legislation  .  AB 2868 (Nunez), in the  
          2003-04 Session, would have enacted the Refund Anticipation  
          Loan Act for the purpose of protecting consumers who enter  
          into RALs, ensuring that those consumers are fully informed  
          of the costs and consequences of those loans.  The bill  
          would have required the registration with the Commission of  
          Corporations of persons and facilitators, as defined,  
          soliciting the execution, processing, receiving, or  
          accepting of an application or agreement for, a refund  
          anticipation loan; moreover, AB 2868 would have authorized  
          the Commissioner to revoke a registration upon making  
          specified findings and to effectuate the purposes of the  
          bill.  The bill passed out of both houses and was vetoed by  
          the Governor.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/23/05)

          CALPRIG
          Children's Defense Fund
          Jackson Hewitt Tax Service
          H & R Block
          HSBC
          Board of Accountancy

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          this bill will ensure that California consumers have the  
          necessary information to make informed decisions about  
          RALs.  A RAL offers taxpayers instant money from their tax  
          returns in just days, as opposed to waiting two to three  
          weeks to receive the actual refund from the IRS.  However,  
          the author's office argues that tax preparation businesses  
          may use questionable techniques when disclosing the terms  
          and agreements for RALs.  Moreover, the author's office  
          argues that tax preparers may target low-income individuals  
          who desperately need the money from their tax.  While their  
          tax preparer may make significant profits from the loan,  
          the consumer often loses significant portions of his or her  







                                                                AB 843
                                                                Page  
          10

          tax refund due to fees and interest.  By requiring tax  
          preparers to clearly and conspicuously display fees,  
          interest rates, and other tax return options, consumers  
          will be prepared to make an informed decision and prepare  
          for future tax refunds.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Arambula, Baca, Bass, Berg, Bermudez, Canciamilla,  
            Chan, Chu, Cohn, Coto, De La Torre, Dymally, Evans,  
            Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome Horton, Jones,  
            Karnette, Klehs, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber,  
            Matthews, Montanez, Mullin, Nation, Nava, Negrete McLeod,  
            Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Ridley-Thomas, Ruskin, Saldana,  
            Salinas, Torrico, Umberg, Vargas, Wolk, Yee, Nunez
          NOES:  Aghazarian, Blakeslee, Bogh, Cogdill, Daucher,  
            DeVore, Emmerson, Harman, Haynes, Shirley Horton,  
            Houston, Huff, Keene, La Malfa, La Suer, Leslie, Maze,  
            McCarthy, Mountjoy, Nakanishi, Niello, Plescia, Richman,  
            Sharon Runner, Spitzer, Strickland, Tran, Villines,  
            Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Benoit, Calderon, Chavez, Garcia,  
            Gordon, Liu


          JJA:cm  8/24/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****